Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
South Asia

BRIDGING THE SOUTH ASIAN DIVIDE
Grins and grimaces
By Syed Saleem Shahzad

KARACHI - Ever since Pakistan made an about-turn in its support of the Taliban in Afghanistan two years ago and threw in its lot with the United States, far from gaining strategic ground in the region as a result, Islamabad appears to be increasingly on the back foot.

The breakthrough announcement at the end of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) summit in Islamabad on Tuesday that India and Pakistan would hold talks next month on Kashmir - over which the countries have fought two wars - has been met in some Pakistani policy-making circles not with pleasure, but with extreme concern.

These elements believe that Pakistan is being steadily forced into a corner by the United States, with India directly benefiting as a result, and they warn that far from being euphoric over the latest developments, the world should not expect any settlement over Kashmir in the near or even distant future.

Amid all the confidence-building measures that have been announced between Pakistan and India over the past few months, including a ceasefire in Kashmir and resumption of travel and sporting links, the chief mover behind the scenes, the US, has assured Islamabad that it will gain from the initiatives. But many among the brains trust of President General Pervez Musharraf are convinced that Pakistan's honeymoon period as a partner in the "war on terror" is over, and it is now being dealt with as the "naughty boy" of the region.

The disgruntled point to US pressure to close military training camps in Pakistan-administered Kashmir - important springboards for cross-border militancy into India, disclosure of Pakistan's support of guerrillas in Afghanistan, and the recent evidence that firmly links Pakistan to Iran's nuclear development program.

All of these developments served to keep Pakistan on the defensive, severely rattling the administration in the process. It was in this environment, with Pakistan vulnerable, that India applied the screws.

Last week, shortly before the start of the SAARC summit, the Indian prime minister's national security advisor, Brajesh Mishra, visited Islamabad for meetings with Musharraf, Vice Chief of Army Staff General Mohammad Yusuf, and the director-general of the Inter-Services Intelligence, Lieutenant-General Ehsan ul-Haq. Mishra successfully pressed on the Pakistanis that during the summit and during the sideline meetings between the top leadership of the two countries, the Kashmir issue "would not go beyond the Line of Control". Meaning, Pakistan would not talk about the right of self-determination of Kashmiris, and the Line of Control, which divides the two disputed sections of Kashmir, would, until a lasting formula is agreed on, serve as the international border. It was also agreed that the two sides would only talk about confidence-building measures. Pakistan agreed, and this is how events panned out.

Agreements made under pressure, however, have a habit of being broken as the element of goodwill is absent, compounded, in this case, by Pakistan's perception that it is being pushed harder up against the wall.

Tale of two assassination attempts
Some months ago, a few weeks after the US issued a clear warning to Pakistan to back out of its support of the guerrillas in Afghanistan, the US presented Pakistani authorities with a list of 23 Pakistani scientists said to have assisted Iran in its nuclear program. The details were comprehensive, including names and travel records. The International Atomic Energy Agency revealed recently that Iran's sensitive uranium enrichment program had been facilitated with Pakistani connivance about 16 years ago.

As a result, several of Pakistan's retired and serving atomic scientists were investigated by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, including the father of Pakistan's atomic program, Dr Abd al-Qadir Khan.

This development once again rattled Pakistan's decision-makers, and it was at this time that they developed a plan to stage-manage an attempt on Musharraf's life (December 14) to disseminate the message that "extremist elements" were out of control because of the US presence and influence in the country and Musharraf's support for Washington. (See Assassination 'windfall' for Musharraf
of December 19)

In an ironic twist, though, another, and apparently real, attempt was made on Musharraf's life on December 26. A federal minister very close to the president told this correspondent on the condition of anonymity that the second attempt was totally unexpected, and highly sophisticated.

Investigations into this attack were conducted jointly by Pakistani civil and military agencies, and they concluded that a few Afghan and Pakistanis were involved. Further, they maintain that the conspiracy was planned by Afghan and Indian intelligence agencies using a renegade faction of the banned militant group Jaish-i-Mohammed as a front. According to the minister, the leader of the faction, Maulana Abdul Jabbar, was already under detention when the attempt on the life of Musharraf was made.

The minister adds that Pakistan avoided pointing a finger at India as the SAARC summit was imminent, but now that the event is over, reaction, and even retaliation, has not been ruled out.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Jan 8, 2004



South Asia: Looking beyond handshakes
(Jan 7, '04)

Pakistan's nuclear dilemma
(Jan 6, '04)

US sticks with Musharraf
(Jan 6, '04)

US draws a bead on Pakistan, Saudi Arabia
(Dec 25, '03)

Assassination 'windfall' for Musharraf 
(Dec 19, '03)

 

     
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong