Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
South Asia

A damp squib for Indian textiles
By Indrajit Basu

KOLKATA - Raman Sethi saw it earlier than most of his peers. Three years back, when his exporter brethren were about to ramp up their businesses hoping to "grab a chunk of the global textiles markets" in the post-Multi-Fiber Arrangement (MFA) quota regime from January 1, 2005, Sethi, owner of PCL Exports, a Delhi-based garment exporter, dismayed his peers by suddenly diversifying into call-center operations. "Because when the quota regime for exporters ends, intense price wars would send earnings crashing," said Sethi, adding that "only big players would survive".

But now, Sethi is not alone. In fact the expiry of the MFA - established in 1975 to allocate quotas on the amount of clothing and textiles that developing nations with cheap labor can export to rich countries - has opened up an unexpected business opportunity for Parsec Technologies, a Gurgaon-based information-technology-enabled consultancy outfit. According to its sales head D J Dutta, over the past few months, 20 small and medium textile and garment exporters from hubs such as Delhi, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), Ludhiana and Chandigarh (both in Punjab) have already sought Parsec's help to diversify into IT-enabled services sectors. "Under the quota regime, exports from India have an assured buyer in the world. But post-2004, it will be free and fair wars between individual countries," says Dutta. "These exporters are clearly worried and are looking at other lines of business."

Indeed, for Indian textile exporters, smaller ones in particular, the initial euphoria about textile and garment exports gaining automatically (since India has a very small quota - less than 5% - compared with other competing textiles exporting countries), is slowly giving way to the realization that in the post-quota regime, perhaps "India is poised to actually miss the bus rather than getting on it".

"This sector is likely to face a very challenging time with the phasing out of quotas," says Arvind Singhal. "Anyone who believes that a quota phase-out will automatically translate into an immediate volume and value increase for the business might find the going tougher than under the quota regime."

Singhal's fears are worth noting. Besides being an acknowledged industry expert, Singhal is also the chairman of KSA Technopak, the Indian subsidiary of Kurt Salmon Associates, a 65-year-old multinational management-consulting firm for consumer products, retail and health-care industries.

According to Singhal, the main reason for India's compromised competitive situation post-MFA is government policies in the past


Some of the government policies hindering growth in the Indian textile/garment sector:

  • Differential rate of taxation for organized and unorganized sector, making the organized sector un-competitive.
  • Labor laws that did not allow the hire and fire of labor, while allowing for unionization, thereby promoting a culture of low accountability and productivity.
  • Limitation of investments in the apparel manufacturing sector to restrict it to an SSI (small scale industry), thereby not promoting "scale".
  • two decades, which have "systematically destroyed the core of this industry" and have resulted in the peculiar structure of the Indian textile and clothing industry. A Technopak study says that in fiscal 2002-03, the organized textile makers produced just about 3.6 percent of all fabric production in India (and about 5.5 percent in terms of value) while the remaining came from the unorganized manufacturing sector that mostly use backdated power-operated weaving machines (called powerlooms) or just manually operated ones (handlooms).

    On the revenue side too, the industry structure is highly skewed. Excluding the output of leading producers (such as Reliance Ind, Indorama and Grasim), the total revenues of the top 20 textiles and clothing companies in India do not exceed US$2 billion. There are no more than 15 apparel exporters in the country that have revenues in excess of $22 million; another 30 between $1 million and $22 million; while none of the numerous rest even touch the million-dollar mark.

    "It is difficult to find such a large-scale industry in the country (or anywhere in the world, for that matter) that is so disorganized as the Indian textile industry," says Singhal.

    Technopak also feels that because of the lopsided government policies of yesteryear, investment in new capacity, crucial for the country's textile sector to take advantage of the post-quota regime, has almost come to a halt in the past five years. According to Technopak, total new investment in the Indian textile and clothing sector, including some modernization in the past five years, has been about $2 billion: puny for an industry that, according to the country's Planning Commission as well as Technopak's estimates, requires more than $21 billion over the next three to five years to be competitive and on an industry-matching global scale.

    Moreover, the sector has received practically no foreign direct investment and there are no signs of this trend reversing any time in the near future.

    Which is why, even as many estimates and studies have projected the outstanding potential of the Indian textile industry in the wake of the phase-out of quotas, experts such as Singhal foresee that, amid a world of rapid consolidation of brands and retailers, which require larger suppliers, India's exports potential remains a suspect since the strength of even the biggest of Indian companies (barring a few) to scale up to global size is untested.

    But that's not all. India's export-product basket for garments caters to just three categories in a list of the top 10. In fabrics, for instance, India's exports were largely "gray" (unfinished) fabrics, "but with buyers seeking packages, fabrics have to be processed and converted into garments", says Singhal. And on fibers, the country's strength so far is largely confined to cotton, which has only a seasonal demand in spring/summer.

    Moreover, according to Atul Kohli of Delhi-based Akriti International, who has been supplying ethnic wear to retail chains such as Newlook and Pilot in the United Kingdom and La Torres in Spain: "Once the free-trade regime sets in and all country quotas are abolished, we will be outgunned by the cheaper stuff from Malaysia, Bangladesh and China."

    "And obviously," says Raghav Gupta, associate director of Technopak, "the maximum threat to the industry is from China.

    "Hence," adds Gupta, "while most of the major organized players will perhaps benefit from the quota phase-out, their overall numbers and contribution to the total Indian textile and clothing industry [about $28 billion in revenues including local and exports in 2003] may add up to an incremental increase of not more than $900 million in 2005 at current prices, or just about 5-6 percent of total export value in 2003-04."

    But even that 5-6 percent growth is optimistic. Gupta also says that because of the likelihood of a steep decline in export prices in the post quota phase-out, the real possibility of stagnation or even an actual decline in India's textile and clothing exports in value terms immediately after January 2005 looms large.

    The tantalizing question therefore is, how can many estimates and studies - including that of the United States International Trade Commission and DHL-McKinsey Apparel and Textile Trade report - conclude that the post-quota regime can give India a winning edge in the world? The DHL-McKinsey study, for instance, has projected a splendid potential of as much as $30 billion in apparel exports by 2009, compared with just close to $5.5 billion in 2004.

    Making projections is easy, feels Singhal. "On the potential front, we can take almost any sector in India - for example, agriculture, tourism, health care or pharmaceuticals - and come up with multibillion-dollar export opportunities for the country," he says, adding, however, that they don't guarantee success.

    Yet there's a silver lining. "Most significant foreign buyers have announced plans to increase sourcing and are following up words with actions," says Gupta. UK retail giant Marks and Spencer is in fact setting up its sourcing office in Bangalore in the near future and "based on interaction with companies like Gap, Wal-Mart, Ikea, J C Penney, Li & Fung, H&M, etc, most are planning to increase their sourcing" from India. Besides, a number of large apparel outsourcing companies in Hong Kong, Sri Lanka, and other Asian countries are being asked by their buyers to set up manufacturing factories in India, reports suggest.

    "We believe more and more buyers will start treating South Asia as one supply base and will base their sourcing offices in India," says Gupta.

    And that could come as a sort of consolation for the jittery nerves of smaller Indian textiles exporters.

    (Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


    Jun 8, 2004



    Singh's economic balancing act
    (May 21, '04)

    India to flood the world with textiles (May 12, '04)

     

         
             
    No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
    Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong