Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
South Asia

India through the Rice prism
By Siddharth Srivastava

NEW DELHI - India has reason to be happy over the appointment of the two people who will ostensibly command US foreign and strategic relations with the rest of the world in the second administration of President George W Bush. The next secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, as well as the next national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, have played key roles in a paradigm shift in US policy toward India, incorporating long-standing demands as well as removing India's grouses in US policy toward India.

Rice, whose nomination follows Colin Powell's announcement on Monday of his resignation, is considered the original architect of an expanded relationship with India and in giving it high priority and a fresh focus in the Bush administration. The Indian Foreign Ministry was never comfortable working with Powell, who despite being the lone moderate voice and other achievements, was not a Bush confidant and did not share the president's larger vision of India. On the other hand, unlike with his boss in the US, Powell enjoyed a personal rapport with Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf, referred to here as "general-to-general speak", that India was never comfortable with. Rice had to face several roadblocks by State Department mandarins (under Powell) who tried to dilute the agreements as well as expand the benchmarks for further cooperation. She will be their boss now.

A September 2000 interview with The International Economy sums up Rice's views on foreign policy vis-a-vis India. She said: "We need to encourage new centers of stability, new centers of prosperity. Let me give you an example: India. This is a country that we have generally treated as if it is simply a nuclear problem and a problem concerning Kashmir, and that's all we ever talk about with India. But this is an emerging knowledge economy that has a real place in the new international economy."

As the main foreign-policy adviser to candidate Bush in the presidential campaign of 2000, Rice argued in an article published in Foreign Affairs that the United States "should pay closer attention to India's role in the regional balance". She went on: "There is a strong tendency conceptually [in the US] to connect India with Pakistan and to think only of Kashmir or the nuclear competition between the two states. But India is an element in China's calculation, and it should be in America's, too. India is not a great power yet, but it has the potential to emerge as one."

In fact Rice, Robert Blackwill (US ambassador to India during 2001-03) and Hadley have been considered as the three-person team working to implement Bush's India policy, often meeting resistance from Powell, who relied a bit too closely on State Department bureaucracy. Hadley and Blackwill were co-authors of the new India policy requested by Bush in 1999. It was Hadley who flew into New Delhi in September 2003 and who was kept well shrouded from the media to present the framework of what is now known as the Next Steps in Strategic Partnership (NSSP) that defines a future course of action between the two countries.

Rice and Hadley continued with the process of Bush's commitment to end the nuclear dispute with India that had led to the US imposing sanctions on the supply of dual-use technologies for peaceful purposes. This was despite US frustration with India's refusal to send troops to Iraq in the first half of 2003. Through the NSSP, Rice and Hadley have helped renew civilian nuclear and space cooperation with India and liberalize high-technology transfers.

Rice and Hadley have also lent a sympathetic ear to India's concerns on terrorism in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and kept up the pressure on Pakistan to stop cross-border infiltration, the one barometer that India uses to judge its neighbor's commitment to take on terror networks. Together with Blackwill, they made the US declare for the first time that the elections in Indian Jammu and Kashmir in 2002 were free and fair. India, on the other hand, has always been skeptical about Powell's fondness for Musharraf, and though Rice has interacted with the general it is unlikely that he is going to be a recipient of similar mollycoddling.

According to foreign-policy expert C Raja Mohan: "It is Rice's recognition of India's prospect as a global power and her determination to discard the South Asian prism [that brackets India and Pakistan] that helped shape the paradigm shift in US policy towards India under the Bush administration. Rice's unconventional view of India prevailed despite the fact that the US needed Pakistan to pursue its objectives in Afghanistan after September 11, 2001. She took a sustained interest in ending the nuclear differences with India that had hobbled bilateral relations for decades. In the controversial National Security Strategy document unveiled by the Bush administration in September 2002, the White House for the first time put India in the section of global powers rather than in the traditional chapters reviewing US regional policy."

Apart from her views, Rice has also over the years assiduously developed direct contacts with her Indian counterparts - Brajesh Mishra, who commanded India's foreign policy under previous prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and now J N Dixit, the national security adviser under new Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Whenever Rice could not fulfill a promise to visit India, she sent her deputy Hadley. This enabled the bureaucracies of the two countries, steeped in Cold War rhetoric, to iron out differences as well as get a real feel of each other. This link was first promoted by Blackwill and sustained when he moved to the White House.

In an interview, Sumit Ganguly, head of India studies at the University of Indiana, Bloomington, lauded Rice's appointment. "Whatever my disagreements with the Bush administration, one has to grant that they have given a certain importance to India. Most definitely her coming to [the State Department] would make a difference. I suspect even more attention would have been paid to India were it not for [September 11], which once again raised the status of Pakistan. I am not so sure that the Pakistani front will be the same. I think she will be fairly clear-eyed and somewhat more tough-minded with Musharraf, unlike Powell, who was quite taken in by the starched uniform and clipped accent of the general."

An Indian delegation led by Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran was to leave for Washington on Wednesday night. While the agenda will be high-technology talks, Saran and his team will meet with Hadley and other senior officials to get a first-hand appreciation of the prospects for Indo-US relations over the next four years, under the new dispensation. They should be smiling all the way.

Siddharth Srivastava is a New Delhi-based journalist.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Nov 18, 2004
Asia Times Online Community



The good soldier abandons the field
(Nov 17, '04)

India digests Bush's second coming
(Nov 6, '04)

India and the US game
(Nov 5, '04)
 

 

     
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong