Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
South Asia

On the road, halfway to Srinagar

MUZZAFARABAD, Pakistan-administered Kashmir - In this lush region, where rivers and mountains define the landscape, runs Chakoti Road, which connects the capital of the Pakistani territory to its counterpart, Srinagar, in Indian-administered Kashmir.

In many places the road runs alongside the Jhelum River, and passes the Kashmiri refugee camp of Manakpayan, which could be called "halfway to Srinagar", which is only 150 kilometers away.

This would be an ideal spot to build a bus stop, in the event that a bus service is resumed between the two capitals of disputed Kashmir. Currently, the Line of Control (LoC) [1] that separates the two regions of Kashmir is closed.

Were the LoC open, refugees in the Manakpayan camp would be the first to visit their homes in Indian-administered Kashmir. Such a possibility has been touted as a first step in confidence-building measures aimed at resolving the Kashmiri dispute, or as Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf has said, "meeting halfway".

However, the refugees in Manakpayan camp are not too impressed. Over the past 10 years or so, since militancy in Kashmir intensified [2] many temporary huts have turned into permanent refugee homes as the dispute between Pakistan and India has dragged on. There are 2,720 refugees in Manakpayan camp, 1,508 in Ambore camp (see below) and altogether 23,056 in the whole of Azad Kashmir.

As soon as people in the Manakpayan camp heard of the arrival of a newsman they rushed to their homes to call their relatives and friends. They gathered in a school run by the non-governmental organization (NGO) READ Foundation. The picture that emerged was one of a whole generation of youths fully politically and ideologically committed to the Kashmiri cause, which for most means accession to Pakistan.

Most of the youths in the camp were science graduates, and most keep informed through the BBC's Hindi and Urdu radio service.

Twenty-nine-year-old Mohammed Rafiq's family migrated to the camp in 1994 from the Kopwara Karnah district of Indian-administered Kashmir. Rafiq knows that should a bus service start, it would pass near his home. But he doubts that he will take a ride.

"Whether by bus or by air, we are not ready to go to Srinagar. This is not the ultimate end of our struggle. The start of a bus service would mean that we accepted the present Line of Control as an international border. I tell you this bus service is not for Kashmiris. No Kashmiri will use that bus service. It is only for a handful of pro-Congress Indian Kashmiris who would come," said Rafiq, referring to the Congress Party in India that heads the coalition government in Delhi.

"When we left our homes, farms, cattle and property behind on the Indian side of the divide and migrated to this side of Kashmir, we were forced to do so. Every day t he Indian army made siege and search operations, they destroyed our private lives. It was compulsory for every man between seven and 70 years to visit a nearby army checkpost three times a day, and have their daily activities registered. They [Indian soldiers] often surrounded our areas and pushed all men, women and children into nearby fields. Then they carried out identification parades, which continued for as long as three days and all folks continued to sit in the open fields surrounded and harassed by Indian army guns.

"The situation is still the same. With over 700,000 [Indian] army present in the Valley, rapes, humiliation and arrests of innocent Kashmiris continue. What value have a bus service and confidence-building measures then," Rafiq questioned.

Mehboobur Rehman, 80, cited almost the same reason for his migration, but he was not as politically and ideologically motivated. Indeed, he remained nostalgic about his past in Indian Kashmir, where he was a rich man in Kopwarah, with farms and three houses. He asked the people sitting nearby to confirm to this correspondent how rich he was, and everybody nodded in his support.

"Why not, why not, for sure I will take a ride on the Srinagar-Muzzafarabad bus and see my native village," said Rehman. His "politically incorrect" remarks outraged the youths sitting around, and they started to taunt him.

"The old man has already lost everything, now he will go to his village to get his bones and flesh buried by the Indian army," said one youth in the crowd.

"Yes! It is true that I lost everything when I migrated to Pakistan. The day after I migrated, Indian forces set ablaze all my houses and farms like they do with everybody who migrates to Pakistan, and distributed the land to other people. Yet there are good old memories and I still look forward to when the Kashmir dispute will be resolved and the Indian Gorkha, Jat and Madras regiments will not come to kill us and I will be able to see my land again," Rehman said.

Where two rivers meet
Conflict always brings with it devastation and degradation in the quality of life, no matter how much people are compensated.

Ambor refugee camp is situated near Domail (where the Jhelum and Neelam rivers meet). The hut-like houses are built on a mountain near the road that follows the Jhelum river. Very much like the Manakpayan camp, the Ambor refugee camp mushroomed in the 1990s after the 1989 uprising in Indian-administered Kashmir. The government of Azad Kashmir (Free - Pakistan - Kashmir) pays Rs750 (US$12.50) per person in a family per month and provides housing. They are allowed to seek employment.

Shaheen Ahmed is 30 years old and says that when he migrated to Pakistani Kashmir he passed intermediate exams, but he could not continue his education.

"For the past 14 years we have been in a permanent state of uncertainty. The day we migrated we thought it was a temporary shift and soon we would be back to home. In this kind of uncertainty, like many other immigrants, I also could not make any career plans. Whatever I have done in the past 10 years is just for survival, " said Ahmed.

Shaheen has no permanent employment or profession. For some time he was employed as a primary teacher in a local NGO school. Now he depends on earnings through private tutoring to local Pakistani Kashmiri children to raise his own four children.

However, in spite of his tough life, Shaheen is firm in his political opinions. "I do not believe that any bus service will start. It is all drama. Even the dialogue is fraud. India is not serious. One thing I tell you, they are all talking on division formulas [for Kashmiri territory]. Let them do it. Kashmiris would not accept any formula which suggests a division of Kashmir. Not even the separation of Jammu from Kashmir, as in every inch of Kashmir people have taken part in the liberation struggle and made the utmost sacrifice. A full new generation has matured during the uprising and all are fully motivated for their right of self-determination," Shaheen said harshly, but in a soft voice.

Notes
[1] The LoC is a demarcation line established in January 1949 as a ceasefire line after the end of the first Kashmir war. In July 1972, after a second conflict, the LoC was re-established under the terms of the Simla Agreement, with minor variations on the earlier boundary. The LoC passes through a mountainous region about 5,000 meters high. North of the LoC, the rival forces have been entrenched on the Siachen Glacier (more than 6,000m high) since 1984 - the highest battlefield in the world. The LoC divides Kashmir on an almost two-to-one basis: Indian-administered Kashmir to the east and south (population about 9 million), which falls into the Indian-controlled state of Jammu and Kashmir; and Pakistani-administered Kashmir to the north and west (population about 3 million), which is labelled by Pakistan as "Azad" (Free) Kashmir. China also controls a small portion of Kashmir.

[2] The territory of Kashmir was bitterly contested even before India and Pakistan won their independence from Britain in August 1947. Under the partition plan provided by the Indian Independence Act of 1947, Kashmir was free to accede to India or Pakistan. The Maharaja, Hari Singh, wanted to stay independent, but eventually decided to accede to India, signing over key powers to the Indian government - in return for military aid and a promised referendum.

Since then, the territory has been the flashpoint for two of the three India-Pakistan wars: the first in 1947-48, the second in 1965. In 1999, India fought a brief but bitter conflict with Pakistani-backed forces who had infiltrated Indian-controlled territory in the Kargil area.

In addition to the rival claims of Delhi and Islamabad to the territory, there has been a growing and often violent separatist movement against Indian rule in Kashmir since 1989.

Islamabad says that Kashmir should have become part of Pakistan in 1947, because Muslims are in the majority in the region. Pakistan also argues that Kashmiris should be allowed to vote in a referendum on their future, after numerous United Nations resolutions on the issue.

Delhi, however, does not want international debate on the issue, arguing that the Simla Agreement of 1972 provided for a resolution through bilateral talks. India points to the Instrument of Accession signed in October 1947 by the Maharaja, Hari Singh.

Both India and Pakistan reject the option of Kashmir becoming an independent state.

Syed Saleem Shahzadis Bureau Chief, Pakistan, Asia Times Online. He can be reached at saleem_shahzad2002@yahoo.com.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us for information on sales, syndication and republishing.)


Dec 2, 2004
Asia Times Online Community



Resolving Kashmir with a Musharraf model
(Oct 29, '04)

On Kashmir, hot air and trial balloons
(Sep 23, '04)

A story in black and white
(Jun 24, '04)
 

 

     
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong