|
|
|
|
SPEAKING
FREELY
Terror comes home to Bangladesh
By Aruni Mukherjee
Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have
their say.
Please click here if you are interested in
contributing.
Terror returned to Bangladesh with 459 coordinated bomb blasts within a space
of 30 minutes that rocked 63 of the country's 64 districts at midday on August
17. Prime Minister Khaleda Zia described it as a "heinous, cowardly,
conspirational and well-planned act of terrorism", and the government launched
a "massive manhunt" for the perpetrators. So far 90 people have been arrested
for questioning in relation to the attacks that left two people dead and nearly
125 injured. Yet the attack should not come as a surprise for the
administration.
Immediately after the blasts, Bangladesh's most powerful neighbor - India -
expressed "grave concern". Delhi had long insisted that Dhaka take action
against the seething Islamic fundamentalism that was brewing there, and had
long been ignored. Now the people in one of the world's poorest countries are
paying for such negligence on the part of their leaders.
According to many analysts, the attacks bore the hallmark of an al-Qaeda
operation. That has not been established yet, but leaflets in the bombed areas
were found, issuing a call for jihad until an Islamic state with Sharia law is
established in Bangladesh. The banned organization Jamaet-ul-Mujahideen was
blamed for the acts of terror; it promptly denied having anything to do with
them.
Perhaps tellingly, just a day before the attacks rocked Bangladesh, Ananda
Bazaar Patrika, a Bengali newspaper published from Kolkata in India, reported
on a leaflet written in Urdu that was being distributed in Muslim-inhabited
blocks of the city asking civilians to raise money for a company titled
"Al-Qaeda International Limited". The police have arrested two Bangladeshi
nationals in the city in connection with this. The headquarters of this
supposed company was Dhaka.
India has long accused Bangladesh of negligence in stopping Islamic terrorist
organizations from going into its border regions. It suspects that a lot of
Indian separatist organizations receive funding and ammunition from
Bangladesh-based outfits. The Jamaet-ul-Mujahideen and another group - Jagrata
Muslim Janata Bangladesh - were banned in February. The ban on the former came
nearly two years after the Dinajpur blasts in northern Bangladesh in 2003, in
which it was also suspected to be involved.
The recent attacks have proven that the earlier ones were merely the tip of an
iceberg. In any case, simply banning a group is easy, implementing the ban in
far-flung rural districts is difficult, especially for Bangladesh, the world's
most corrupt country, according to the latest Transparency International
report.
Moreover, many observers accuse Jamait-e-Islami, a mainstream political party
that is a member of the ruling coalition government, of actively supporting
such groups. Investors, especially foreign, already think twice before putting
their money in the country, and such direct political involvement in mass acts
of terror would surely scare them away. Aftabul Islam, president of the
American Chamber of Commerce in Bangladesh, said, "So far we have been saying
there are no ... Islamist extremists [in Bangladesh], but now we cannot hide
the reality."
Bangladesh has been unstable for a while. As Chinese leader Mao Zedong remarked
once, "It only takes a spark to start a prairie fire." Worse yet, this
instability has spillover effects across the border in India. As a Ministry for
External Affairs spokesman in Delhi said, "A stable, prosperous, secular and
democratic Bangladesh is ... in the ... interest of ... India."
First, reservations about security conditions in Bangladesh have dogged the
proposed $4 billion gas pipeline between India and Myanmar. According to latest
estimates, nearly 30% of Bangladesh's youth are unemployed. At least some would
get employment in construction projects for this pipeline, not to mention the
benefits to the economy of the transit fees India would pay to Dhaka for
shipping nearly $40 billion worth of gas from Myanmar.
Second, a massive narcotic contraband nexus has reportedly been formed to
finance many of the terrorist activities in eastern and northeastern India, not
to mention within Bangladesh itself. Many security analysts argue that vested
interests within the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) - the border guards - have also
developed to profit out of this network. Lobbying from these groups might go a
long distance to explain Dhaka's vocal opposition towards India's move to fence
the border between the two countries. It also explains the often-violent
skirmishes between India's Border Security Force and the BDR, which leads to
diplomatic spats with Delhi.
Third, India has maintained that ever since 1971, the birth of Bangladesh, a
continuous tide of illegal migrants has flocked to India from Bangladesh, and
lately it has accused border officials of facilitating this people-trafficking.
However, the right-wing backlash to the Bangladeshi influx is equally worrying.
Recently, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidharthi Parishad (All India Students' Union),
an organization affiliated to the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, was
involved in an anti-migrants campaign in Assam where it alleged that illegal
aliens were determining the outcome of elections in 46 out of 126
constituencies in the state. It has been lobbying the central government in
Delhi to repeal the Illegal Migrants Act, which will put the onus on the
alleged immigrants to prove their nationality, and ease the deportation
process.
Bangladesh is officially secular. However, over 90% of its population is
Muslim. In such a scenario, a newly invigorated Islamist movement can pose a
threat of the highest degree to the prevalent social order. To counter this
dangerous trend, the first step is self-reflection. Dhaka must accept that the
country is awash with jihadis, and must take India up on its offer of "any kind
of assistance". Ironically, when the bombers struck, Prime Minister Khaleda Zia
was signing a six-point treaty with Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao in
Beijing that would facilitate cooperation in business and provide Chinese help
in building civilian nuclear plants in Bangladesh. That is pure bad press for a
nation that has seen over three decades of infighting, uncertainty and
disruption.
Aruni Mukherjee is based at the University of Warwick, UK and takes a
deep interest in the political economy of the Indian sub-continent. He is
originally from Kolkata, India.
(Copyright 2005 Aruni Mukherjee)
Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have
their say.
Please click here if you are interested in
contributing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
All material on this
website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written
permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times
Online Ltd.
|
|
Head
Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong
Kong
Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
|
|
|
|
