WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Aug 1, 2006
The enemy within India's army
By Sudha Ramachandran

BANGALORE - Three Indian soldiers are reported have admitted to links with a banned terrorist outfit, the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT). The news has triggered some alarm, for this is the first time in the 16 years since the insurgency erupted in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) that evidence has emerged of militants having infiltrated the Indian army.

The three - identified as Abdul Haq, Mohammad Sharief and Mohammad Shakeel - belong to the Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry and come from Gursai village of Mendhar in the Poonch district, which borders Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Infiltration of terrorists across the Line of Control is very high in Poonch.

Haq, Sharief and Shakeel are reported to have admitted to helping the Lashkar. A jihadist group with close ties to Pakistan's


 
intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence, Lashkar has carried out several attacks, including suicide operations in Jammu and other parts of India. It is believed to have masterminded the recent serial blasts in Mumbai as well.

The three soldiers are said to have admitted to links with the Lashkar's divisional commander in the Mendhar area, Abu Osama. They have said they provided the terrorist group with mobile-phone SIM (subscriber identity module) cards on fake names as well as batteries and pencil cells for use in detonating explosives. They are also said to have provided shelter to terrorists in their homes.

Their links with the LeT came to light during the interrogation of Tipu, a Lashkar operative who was arrested a few days after the July 11 grenade blasts in Srinagar. Tipu's interrogation also revealed links between the Lashkar and two police constables, Sikander and Kabir.

The links between the Jammu police and militants have not created much of a flutter, as the nexus between the two has existed from the start of the insurgency. While some police officers provided militants with information, others facilitated the looting of police weaponry. Some even carried out attacks.

In 1992, a police driver was found to have planted a bomb in the office of the then director general of police J N Saxena, badly injuring him. More recently seven cops, including a sub-inspector, were arrested for links with militants who assassinated a former minister, Mushtaq Ahmed Lone, at a public rally. There have been instances too of members of the Special Operations Group (SOG), the Jammu police counter-insurgency unit, being arrested for their links with terrorist outfits.

But this was not the case with the country's armed forces. The recent arrests are the first time that links between soldiers and militants have come to light.

However, concern over possible infiltration of the armed forces by terrorists appears to have been on the minds of India's policymakers and intelligence agencies. National Security Adviser M K Narayanan had written to state chief secretaries last August warning them about possible terrorist infiltration into the armed forces. In November, Narayanan had apparently also alerted the Indian Air Force (IAF) regarding possible infiltration by Lashkar militants.

The possibility of terrorist infiltration of the armed forces surfaced in the media last week when a report hinted that the IAF had been infiltrated. While admitting that the IAF had indeed received an alert regarding Lashkar infiltration, a spokesman clarified that the air force had "scanned the system and hadn't found any" infiltration.

Then came the report on the links of the three soldiers with LeT.

Already under criticism from the opposition parties for its soft handling of terrorism, the government quickly played down the threat posed by the reported links of the three arrested soldiers. Officials denied that infiltration had occurred, describing the links as "some administrative support".

An army officer based in Jammu told Asia Times Online that the three soldiers "were too junior to have access to sensitive information".

Interrogation of the three soldiers has revealed that they were coerced to provide help. They feared that members of their family, who lived in the terrorism-stricken district, would be killed by LeT terrorists if they did not obey their orders.

For years, ordinary Kashmiris have complained that they have had no option but to obey the militants' diktats, as they would demand food, shelter or money at the point of the gun. Fear prompted many of them, even those who were opposed to the militancy, to accommodate the militants. But the armed forces would subsequently harass these people for having "supported" the militants. "The armed forces don't understand our dilemma" was a constant refrain that one heard in Kashmir.

If the army's response to the reported infiltration of its ranks is any indication, it seems that it is not so insensitive to the pressures that Kashmiris confront. The army has come out in defense of its soldiers. A statement issued by the army says: "Their families in Gursai village are vulnerable to violence by militants; so they provided some administrative support such as food, shelter, batteries and clothes. We do not believe there are links or a nexus with any [terrorist] outfit. Initial inquiries have brought out that the jawans [soldiers] acted under coercion or fear of threat to their families."

Explaining the complexity of the issue, the army officer in Jammu pointed out, "For many Indians living away from the conflict zone, Haq's, Sharief's and Shakeel's support for the Lashkar-e-Toiba merits their being labeled as threats to India's national security. But for those on the ground in this violence-hit region, these three men were also victims of terror."

Indeed, recruiting locals is a gamble for the armed forces, but it is a risk they need to take to address the alienation of Kashmiris from India. For years Kashmiris, especially Kashmiri Muslims, avoided the Indian army. The perception of the army as an occupation force in Kashmir and fear of the militants had kept them from joining the armed forces.

This has changed in recent years, with Kashmiris slowly trickling into the security forces. Early this year, thousands of Kashmiri youth showed up during recruitment drives, despite warnings issued by militant outfits such as the Hizbul Mujahideen. "Whosoever joins the Indian forces will be treated as a 'traitor' and dealt with severely," the Hizbul Mujahideen warned in advertisements carried in local newspapers.

While army sources admit that the enthusiastic local response to recruitment drives is grounded in rampant unemployment, they say that the "act of defiance" of these youths must be acknowledged. "More than the recruits, it is their families that are more vulnerable to terrorist reprisals," said the army officer.

The Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry to which the three LeT-linked soldiers belong is drawn from the local population. Unlike soldiers from other parts of India whose families are far away from the conflict zone, the local recruits in the Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry have to live with the constant fear that terrorists will harm their families.

Gursai village to which Haq, Sharief and Shakeel belong has repeatedly suffered horrific violence because many boys from this village joined the security forces. When a constable refused to give Lashkar-e-Toiba shelter in his home, his son was beheaded. Another Gursai resident refused to obey Lashkar orders; his house was burned down by the terrorists. Scores of such incidents have been reported from Gursai.

But this is not the experience of Gursai alone. There are scores of villages across Jammu and Kashmir that have similar stories to tell. This could mean that there are many more like Haq, Sharief and Shakeel - victims of terrorism perhaps, but threats to national security as well.

To deal with the problem of terrorism, India's armed forces will have to continue to keep their eyes trained on infiltration across the Line of Control. But they might need to keep looking over their shoulders as well. There is a looming threat from within their ranks.

Sudha Ramachandran is an independent journalist/researcher based in Bangalore.

(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing .)


India playing politics with terrorism (Jul 22, '06)

India's soft response to the Mumbai bombings (Jul 19, '06)

Mumbai attacks: A new spiral of violence (Jul 13, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110