WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
              Click Here
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Nov 18, 2006
US-India nuclear deal closer to fruition
By Siddharth Srivastava

NEW DELHI - The Indo-US nuclear deal cleared a major hurdle when the US Senate approved the pact, with no crippling amendments, with an overwhelming 85-12 vote. It had already passed the House of Representatives. Assuming any differences are reconciled in a House-Senate conference, the deal will be much closer to fruition.

While a new Congress was elected last week, it won't take office until January. The nuclear deal was approved in a short-term



"lame duck" session, convened to address pressing issues until its term formally expires. It was in this small window in which New Delhi hoped the deal would get a final stamp of approval. Republicans enjoy a majority in both houses of the outgoing Congress.

Had the legislation failed, it would have had to be reintroduced in the new Congress, where the Democrats will hold a majority in both houses. Although the deal has bipartisan support, the added Democratic members increased the chances that amendments unpalatable to New Delhi might have been enacted.

But the deal still must receive critical approvals from the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency and the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). So it may take many more months before India is able to purchase, or US firms able to profit from sales of, US nuclear fuel, reactors and related technology.

President George W Bush, who was in Singapore at the time, lauded the Senate action within minutes of the passage. "The United States and India enjoy a strategic partnership based upon common values. Today, the Senate has acted to further strengthen this relationship by passing legislation that will deliver energy, non-proliferation and trade benefits to the citizens of two great democracies," Bush said.

A few hours before the vote, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh spoke briefly to Bush by telephone and conveyed that India hoped that the nuclear bill in its final form (without the "killer amendments") would be passed.

US Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Richard Lugar said, "This agreement is the most important strategic diplomatic initiative undertaken by President Bush. By concluding this pact and the far-reaching set of cooperative agreements that accompany it, the president has embraced a long-term outlook."

Republican and Democratic senators came together on a 73-26 vote to defeat decisively an amendment by Democrat Jeff Bingaman that would have required the president to determine that India committed to a cap on its fissile-material production before Washington could proceed with nuclear exports to India.

The Senate also defeated the amendments and "bargaining chips'' sought by Senator Russ Feingold. The changes sought to rein in considerably India's independent nuclear-weapons program, which is completely outside the purview of the agreement signed by Bush and Manmohan.

Though New Delhi has given a commitment that any nuclear technology obtained from abroad will only be used for civilian purposes and such nuclear reactors will be open to inspection by international agencies, it wants to refrain from opening its entire nuclear program to scrutiny. New Delhi has maintained that India's record as a responsible democratic nation should be enough for the international community to recognize it as a nuclear exception.

More than US$100 billion of nuclear commerce is expected to be generated worldwide.

One reason Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist did not succeed in introducing the bill earlier in the session was the large number of amendments to the original agreement that the Democrats wanted. Despite lobbying by India, especially after then-foreign secretary Shyam Saran's visit to Washington in September, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid cut the amendments only from 18 to 17.

Indian policymakers had feared that emboldened Democrats, perhaps to slow down a Republican policy initiative, would now be more insistent about the changes. This could well shred the stout defense of the pact as well as improved Indo-US ties of the incumbent Congress party-led government headed by Manmohan Singh.

In July, Manmohan assured parliament that his government would never compromise in a manner that was inconsistent with the July 18 Indo-US joint statement on civilian nuclear energy. "I have on more than one occasion shared our government's views in parliament that we will not compromise and that everything would be transparent,'' he said.

Indeed, there is reason that Manmohan called Bush before Thursday's vote. According to officials, New Delhi was not comfortable letting the volatile debate on the nuclear issue slide too close to Indian general elections scheduled for 2009. There is still a long road ahead beyond the US Congress and the NSG to get the nuclear exemptions in place.

Although there is a big constituency that support's Manmohan's pro-US agenda, the Congress party is averse to antagonizing chunks of the Indian population, including Muslims and poorer sections yet unaffected by liberal economic policies, who continue to be virulent in their anti-US views.

In such a situation, New Delhi is keen to seal the deal as one of its significant achievements without standing out as the signature feature of its tenure. It would thus ideally want the pact to be out of the limelight as soon as possible, so as to highlight other policy initiatives, including steps toward social equity.

If the recent polls in the large state of Uttar Pradesh are any indication, there seems to be a coalescing of upper-caste voters against the Congress party, which is being interpreted as a vote against reserving seats for lower-caste students in prestigious educational institutions. Competitive and populist electoral politics will begin to hold sway perhaps less than a year from now.

While the left-wing parties in the governing coalition have agreed not to derail the nuclear pact in parliament, New Delhi has promised that it will not be overly strict on Chinese firms investing in India. Such an arrangement will, however, unravel once the elections approach and the Congress and leftist parties have to fight it out on their own in the electoral battlefield.

What New Delhi was fretting about the most vis-a-vis the nuclear pact was the time factor. Those fears are considerably allayed now because of the favorable vote in the US Senate.

Siddharth Srivastava is a New Delhi-based journalist.

(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing .)


A lame-duck chance for Indo-US deal (Nov 10, '06)

Bad news for the Indo-US nuclear deal (Oct 3, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110