WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Feb 28, 2007
Should India gamble on microchips?
By Indrajit Basu

KOLKATA - Even as the wait ended last week with India announcing its semiconductor policy, global information-technology (IT) analysts have already started wondering whether India should just stick to designing chips rather than devote resources to an industry where the money flow is drying up.

After succumbing to year-long lobbying from the semiconductor industry, India announced the broad contours of the package of incentives that the country is planning for semiconductor fabrication and other micro- and nano-technology manufacturing



industries, which it hopes will put the country on the global chip-manufacturing map.

"India lacks a full-fledged 'fab' [silicon-chip fabrication plant]. Since we did not have a clear-cut policy so far, we lost several companies to Vietnam and Israel," said the country's IT and telecommunications minister, Dayanidhi Maran. "This could draw foreign direct investment of [US]$10 billion coming into the country for semiconductor and allied manufacturing."

But it's not yet clear whether this policy could actually spur global semiconductor giants to set up fab units in India. Some global IT analysts say India has already missed the fab bus and it's too late to bother.

"India is considering new chip-making facilities just as the fund flow to foundries is dying down in Asia," said Bhavin Shah, a Hong Kong-based analyst for investment-banking firm JPMorgan. "We think it is too late for India to devote resources to chip manufacturing. India should not repeat the mistake of some countries that have tried to build a home-grown foundry/back-end industry. We expect no real returns from any government financial support for Indian semiconductor manufacturing."

Indeed, going by the successes achieved by some countries that have set up fabrication facilities for semiconductor devices and the "prestige" such countries command, India's temptation to support this industry is understandable. But as they say, all mountains look beautiful from a distance.

"The big question is," said Ganesh Ramamurthy, analyst at the global technology research firm Gartner, "should India be in the semiconductor fab space at all? As per our [Gartner] study, there will be an overcapacity situation in fab by 2009.

"Assuming that India starts building fab construction this year, India would start production at a time when the world would face overcapacity. It is not going to be easy for Indian producers to attract customers in that situation where cost would be a very critical factor."

Admittedly, fab is an expensive proposition by any standard. A full-fledged fab requires an investment of $3 billion or $4 billion or more. But cost is not the only barrier. According to a JPMorgan study, there are other even bigger barriers, such as access to technology, finding workers who are familiar with the foundry process, and persuading customers to devote a large amount of resources to an unknown player.

While capital has been easily attainable from governments, the barriers to achieving profitability are enormous. "A full-blown semiconductor logic foundry is one of the most complex job shops on this planet," said the report. "Producing a wide range of chip wafers in different quantities and technologies is a very difficult undertaking. and research and development costs are becoming the biggest challenge for industry laggards."

Then there is the issue of competitiveness. "In a world of free trade and WTO [World Trade Organization], we see no need for any country, let alone India, to fund new initiatives in this space," said Shah.

Taiwan dominates the foundry industry and has already captured 65% of worldwide foundry revenues, which makes it very difficult for countries such as China and India to compete with the scale, ecosystem and customer relationships that Taiwan has built up over the past two decades. Moreover, India needs to compete with Ireland, Israel and Malaysia for tax breaks to semiconductor makers.

For that matter, even China, which has provided huge support to kick off semiconductor manufacturing, has seen no real success story so far, said Shah, at least not from a return on investment standpoint. He said Chinese foundries have been unprofitable "despite a bucketful of incentives" and tax breaks.

Still, why then are India and a few entrants gung-ho about setting up fab facilities in the country? For instance, last year, SemIndia, a consortium of overseas Indians, announced plans for a $3 billion chip-making facility in Hyderabad in partnership with Advanced Micro Devices Inc and Flextronics Software Systems Ltd and financed by a host of private-equity funds. Recently two more companies, Nano-Tech Silicon India and NeST, said they too want to set up a fab.

The arguments in favor of fabs in India are many. For one, says the Indian Semiconductor Association (ISA), semiconductor-manufacturing facilities will create a semiconductor "ecosystem", which in turn will help Indian companies move up the global value chain.

According to the global consultancy firm ISA/Frost & Sullivan, India is the fastest-growing market for electronic products in the world, with electronic-goods consumption (from mobile telephones, flat-screen televisions and set-top boxes to smart washing machines) expected to grow from $28 billion in 2005 to $363 billion by 2015, representing a compound annual growth rate of 30%. Of this, the market for the semiconductor industry is expected to be about $36.3 billion.

More important, even if fab is not the need of the moment for India, it is certainly "an issue of pride", said Bryan Lewis, chief analyst at Gartner. After all, semiconductors are among the ultimate in high-tech pursuits and give a country considerable bragging rights. Some also argue that a semiconductor industry is strategically important for any country that hopes to be a true global power.

Many experts feel that even if India is determined to set up its own fab industry, no plant should be established for at least five years.

"India should not think of setting up a fab in the next five years, after which the global overcapacity situation is expected to ease off quite bit," said Ganesh Ramamurthy of Gartner, and "instead the country should concentrate purely on chip design and intellectual-property development", such as developing the software or instructions that go in an integrated chip.

The broad opinion is that in chip design India has certain advantages over many countries, including Taiwan and mainland China, which include superior technical education, a high number of English speakers, copyright laws and, most important, a sense of self-belief boosted by the successful Indian software sector.

"The fact that India has no chip foundries should not matter, because India is already one of the most preferred destinations for chip design," said Shah of JPMorgan, "and revenues of this segment of the semiconductor industry have been growing much faster than the total semiconductor industry over the last 10 years."

Moreover, according to iSuppli - a tech research firm - India already has a mature design-services sector, which has seen its revenues grow from $511 million in 2004 to $623 million in 2005.

"India has about 125 companies doing design, including multinationals, domestic companies such as Wipro and Sasken, and a handful of Silicon Valley startups with Indian research and development centers," iSuppli says. "In 2005, giant multinationals like Texas Instruments, Intel, Cypress, Infineon, and ST Microelectronics comprised about 70% of the total semiconductor-design industry in India and about 30% was produced by home-grown companies."

What the policy offers
  • A subsidy of 20% of capital expenditure during the first 10 years if the unit is inside a special economic zone (SEZ).
  • A subsidy of 25% of capital expenditure during the first 10 years if the unit is outside an SEZ.
  • Minimum investment in fab plants is $555 million.
  • Minimum investment in ancillary plants is $220 million.
  • Government participation is limited to 26% of the project's equity.
  • Incentives are not extended to older plants with second-hand equipment.

    Indrajit Basu is a Kolkata-based journalist.

    (Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

  • Sculptors of Silicon India (Jun 20, '02)

     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
    Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110