WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     May 30, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Bad blood spreads to Afghanistan's north
By M K Bhadrakumar

unsettled. The violence in the Amu Darya region was the most horrendous, even by the tragic standards of those times, as the Taliban nonchalantly swung northward after capturing Kabul in 1996.

The first ever attack on German troops by a suicide bomber in Kunduz town on the Afghanistan-Tajikistan border on May 19 would also have alerted leaders such as Dostum. Kunduz is an



extremely sensitive area, with a sizable (possibly, majority) presence of Pashtun settlements. Besides the Pashtuns, Uzbek and Tajik communities live in the area. Former Northern Alliance leader Ahmed Shah Massoud (assassinated in 2001) tried in vain to reclaim the strategic town from the Taliban. As a stronghold of the Taliban, Kunduz posed a major challenge during the US invasion in 2001.

The Taliban are evidently adopting a new strategy. After registering their presence in a vast swath of land in the south almost up to the approaches to Kabul city, they are beginning to commit attacks in the north. From all accounts, the suicide bomber who attacked the German troops was a Taliban activist. The attack took place in the busy market center of Kunduz. Three German troops were killed; five were wounded seriously and were airlifted to Cologne for medical treatment, apart from seven Afghan civilians who were killed and 13 wounded.

Germany reassessing
Veterans like Dostum will be apprehensive how long the few hundred young German male and female conscripts (Germany doesn't have professional soldiers) scattered on a difficult terrain from Kunduz in the east almost up to the sand dunes of Faryab in the west, stretched along the Afghanistan-Uzbekistan border, will be able to hold if the Taliban make a determined comeback.

The Germans have been shell-shocked by the Kunduz attack. A furious debate has begun in Germany about the Afghan mission, which has never been popular in public opinion. Will Germany stay the course? The Bundestag (parliament) will debate whether to extend the separate military mandates in Afghanistan: Germany's participation in the International Security Assistance Force, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led forces mandated by the United Nations Security Council, the deployment of six German Tornado reconnaissance aircraft, and the involvement of up to 100 German special forces in the US-led Operation Enduring Freedom.

Der Spiegel assessed that Berlin is mulling its role, and might well decide to withdraw from Operation Enduring Freedom. The point is, there is no possibility in sight for increasing Germany's troop levels if the situation were to deteriorate on the ground in northern Afghanistan.

The tensions in the northern region are building at a time when relations between Uzbekistan and Western powers remain frozen. The Amu Darya region has traditionally been within the sphere of influence of Uzbekistan. Tashkent has a major role to play if the security of northern Afghanistan reaches a flashpoint.

Beyond this factor lies the geopolitics of the "new cold war". Certainly, Russian policies in the Central Asian region have shifted gear in recent months in response to the US decision regarding missile-defense deployments in Russia's neighboring regions. (Chinese criticism of the US missile-defense deployments has also become frequent and focused.)

There are renewed calls in Kyrgyzstan for the vacation of the US airbase in Manas. Kyrgyzstan is hosting the annual summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in August. An SCO counter-terrorism exercise is under way in Kyrgyzstan.

Growing Russian involvement
More important, the summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) is scheduled for next month. Russia visualizes the CSTO as the primary vehicle of its strategy toward Central Asia's security. The deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan is certain to figure on the agenda of the CSTO summit.

NATO activities in Afghanistan are under close Russian scrutiny. Moscow has openly begun voicing criticism of the US-led NATO policies toward Central Asia. CSTO secretary general Nikolai Bordyuzha said while on a visit to Bishkek last week that NATO has been pursuing a "policy of projecting and consolidating its military-political presence in the Caucasus and in Central Asia". He spoke of "external challenges and risks that undermine stability in the post-Soviet space", which are emanating out of the "growing activities of extra-regional structures, primarily NATO, the European Union and third countries".

Bordyuzha singled out Washington's "Greater Central Asia" policy, which envisages Afghanistan as the hub of the US strategy toward Central Asia. He criticized this as an attempt to drive a geopolitical wedge between regional states on the one hand and Russia and the CSTO on the other. Bordyuzha said, "This is an attempt to reorient the Central Asian states towards cooperation with the United States in a new format, encompassing, besides the Central Asian states, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and in the future, India."

Russian Foreign Minister Segei Lavrov has voiced similar apprehensions. "NATO is continuing to follow its expansionist policy and is moving its military infrastructure closer to our territory," Lavrov said in an interview recently with German television.

Without doubt, Moscow had the worrisome security situation in northern Afghanistan in mind when a delegation of the CSTO visited Kabul in March. The visit caused great annoyance in Washington. The US doesn't want Russia to come anywhere near Kabul. Washington continues to ignore Russia's three-year-old proposal to have formal CSTO-NATO coordination on Afghanistan. But Moscow is lately asserting its regional role.

The Russian Foreign Ministry's major foreign-policy document approved recently by President Vladimir Putin made a pointed reference to the imperative of "de-monopolization of the political settlement" in Afghanistan. It underlined the importance of the "enlistment of all of Afghanistan's neighbors without exception" in the Afghan settlement. Clearly, the reference was to the exclusive Washington-London axis that determines the contours of the Afghan "settlement".

In the run-up to the CSTO delegation's visit to Kabul, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman stated in Moscow on March 5, "In the light of increasing Taliban and al-Qaeda activities, President Karzai and the Afghan government have asked Russia to resume supplies of military equipment."

Russia and the Central Asian states traditionally depended on northern Afghanistan's experienced leaders such as Dostum and Massoud to ensure peace in the Amu Darya region. Moscow's understanding with Massoud dated to the early 1980s. That was also the time when Dostum underwent training in a Soviet military academy.

M K Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service for more than 29 years, with postings including ambassador to Uzbekistan (1995-98) and to Turkey (1998-2001).

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110