WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Oct 6, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Ram-ming the Indian economy
By Chan Akya

differences, due to their need to manage coalition partners pulling in many different directions.

Differences between the Congress and the BJP appear mainly cosmetic and personality-driven, with the former positioning itself as the "party of Nehru and Gandhi" and the latter as a "Hindu mainstream" grouping.

Regional parties are more malleable in general. For example, an



Indian journalist friend pointed out that the BJP had been in an electoral alliance with the DMK (the chief of which made the derogatory remarks on Lord Ram) less than five years ago. The friend also pointed out that the DMK needed Congress support to further the business interests of its key leaders, including those of the chief minister who made the remarks.

The point of bringing in Ram, interestingly enough, came from a project to deepen the coastal waters between India and Sri Lanka that necessitated the destruction of a submerged land bridge between the two countries. (Opponents of the plan claim the project would interfere with the sub-sea structure of a bridge to Sri Lanka constructed in ancient times under Ram's instructions by an army of monkeys - See Hindus say don't mess with Rama's Bridge, Asia Times Online, September 25, 2007.)

Other critics of the project have pointed to significant environmental hazards associated with the idea of bringing oil-bearing tankers and other large ships to a rocky coast that hosts unique ecological systems, including a marine bird sanctuary.

Businessmen have meanwhile pointed out that the channel between the two countries is still too narrow and water flows too fast to make any realistic difference to transit times. Last, security experts warn that the new channel will just make it easier for Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam rebels in Sri Lanka to flee to Indian waters when pursued by the Sri Lankan navy.

Anecdotal imagery
As an aside, it is difficult to see why the DMK's recent comments on Lord Ram have provoked so much anger. Many prominent politicians, starting with the first prime minister of independent India, Jawaharlal Nehru, have criticized Hinduism extensively and compared Sanskrit epics like the Ramayana and Mahabharata to Greek poems like the Iliad rather than to the Bible or the Koran.

This is perhaps understandable in the context of the Hindu-Buddhist use of anecdotal imagery to convey profound philosophical observations. In turn it makes such epics assume literal rather than religious importance to atheists and agnostics who reject or fail to understand the philosophy being espoused.

That long history of criticism, though, benefited from being outside the public eye, without a 24-hour media presence to scrutinize every move. In much the same way that recent television images of queues outside a British bank [6] made global headlines that helped cast the country in the same light as "banana republics", the public criticism of Lord Ram by a coalition leader that was carried almost verbatim by television and radio stations instantly helped to inflame passions much more than if they had been reported simply in regional publications.

Another characteristic of politicians criticizing religion in India appears to be that while attacks on Hindu culture, rituals and traditions are perfectly acceptable to left-wing leaders on the grounds of furthering rationality and countering superstitions, the same is not true when minority religions such as Islam and Christianity are concerned. According to the aforementioned journalist, making light of the Prophet Mohammad or Jesus would earn a quick dismissal from government jobs, along with lawsuits and threats to life.

Beyond politics
Hindu parties, sidelined by the electorate for a few years, seized this opportunity to take center stage, but in doing so may have played straight into the hands of the Congress that wanted the communists to come running back into its fold. The government has also expanded some politically valuable economic programs - such as guaranteed employment for the rural poor, a scheme so awful that it boggles any rational person's mind.

The government proposes to simply pay rural poor for work that is not done nor needs to be performed - in other words, the ultimate pork barrel giveaway. The scheme, costing over US$5 billion, will prove inflationary in the medium term, but that is obviously not a big consideration for a government seeking to remain in power.

Away from ill-thought economic programs that belie any reform credentials of either the prime minister or Finance Minister P Chidambaram, the government has also failed to take any decisive stance on foreign-policy issues. There is no official criticism of Myanmar, for example, for fear of offending the communist parties who have obviously much in common with anyone who beats Buddhist monks to death and tosses their bodies into rivers.

The ultimate cost of the present period of chaos in Indian politics, though, may be felt by the economy. Increased budget deficits and government intervention in the economy, which are hallmarks of communist-led governments, will help to push down economic growth in the coming years. Lacking any energetic leaders, it is unlikely that the BJP can actually ramp back into power at the next husting, even if that may turn out to be the best thing for the economy in the coming decades.

Notes
1. Government of India statistics – www.indiastat.com
2. www.cmie.com –subscription required by CMIE - Center for Monitoring Indian Economy Pvt. Ltd.
3. The jihadi ate my homework Asia Times Online, February 24, 2007.
4. Much of my political analysis is based on a perusal of Indian media, both on the Internet and in hard copy, over the past two weeks. Any errors are my own. 5. Caste-away Asia Times Online, June 15, 2007.
6. Rocking the land of Poppins Asia Times Online September 22, 2007.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110