WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Nov 14, 2007
Page 1 of 2
India stands by Myanmar status quo
By Bertil Lintner

CHIANG MAI - Myanmar's principal foreign ally China has shown in the wake of the military junta's recent armed crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators that Beijing is more interested in maintaining stability than pushing for democratic regime change. So then could India, Myanmar's other key regional ally, be persuaded to use its influence to facilitate political change?

The United States, the European Union and even Myanmar exiles in New Delhi, who have recently demonstrated outside the Indian



Parliament, have all appealed to what Indian politicians proudly proclaim is the world's largest democracy to live up to those ideals and push for change in Myanmar.

India and Myanmar share a complicated and delicate history, one marked as much by mistrust as amity. In recent years India has shifted its diplomatic support from Myanmar's hamstrung pro-democracy movement towards the ruling military junta, driven by realpolitik imperatives including greater access to Myanmar's untapped energy resources and its support in putting down ethnic insurgent groups active in remote border territories.

India's still delicate rapprochement with Myanmar means that New Delhi will no time soon answer the West's call to take a more assertive policy position with regard to the military junta. Indeed, India's foreign policy has never been guided by promoting democracy in other countries.

On the contrary, "democratic" India was the Soviet Union's main ally in Asia during the Cold War, because it suited the regional security interests of both countries. India has not even pushed for democracy in one of its closest neighbors and allies, the Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan, one of the world's last remaining absolute monarchies.

India's relations with Myanmar are even more troubled and delicate than China's. During the British colonial era, Myanmar, then known as Burma, was made into a province of British India, which it remained until 1937 when it became a separate colony. During that time, large numbers of Indians migrated or were brought in by the British as laborers. The railways, post and telegraph, the police and the civil service were also staffed with people of Indian origin.

Just before World War II, the Indians numbered over 1 million of a total population of about 16 million at the time and 45% of the former capital Yangon's population was of South Asian origin - Hindu, Muslim and Sikh. Their numbers were reduced when the Japanese invaded in 1941 and many of them fled to India. But many also remained until the war was over, and even after independence in 1948.

The role Indians played as intermediaries between the colonial British and the native population gave rise to sometimes fierce anti-Indian sentiments. Throughout the 1930s and 1940s, the Myanmar nationalist movement had strong undertones of communal tension. Even today, people of South Asian origin are often looked down on in Myanmar, popularly referred to as kala a Burmese language pejorative meaning "foreigner" or "Indian". Curiously, Caucasians are still called kala pyu, which translates from the Burmese to "white Indians".

Still, Myanmar's relations with India were in the main cordial after independence. Myanmar's first prime minister, U Nu, was known to be a close friend to his Indian counterpart Jawaharlal Nehru and both leaders were prominent figures in the Cold War-inspired Non-Aligned Movement. Indeed, India helped Myanmar survive its first difficult years as an independent state, including crucially when various political and ethnic insurgent groups threatened to break the new country apart. Without India's massive military and economic aid, U Nu's government would most probably have collapsed.

Xenophobic backlash
However, Indo-Myanmar relations chilled after General Ne Win's military coup and seizure of power in March 1962. After a few years in power, his revolutionary council moved to nationalize privately owned businesses and factories, of which an estimated 60% were owned by people of Indian origin. Thousands lost their property and livelihood and during the four-year period spanning 1964-68 some 150,000 Indo-Burmese left the country.

Many leaders of the formerly democratic Myanmar also fled, among them U Nu, who went into exile in India. The Indian government put him up in a stately residence in Bhopal, where he remained for well over a decade before returning to Myanmar under a general amnesty in 1980. Bilateral relations between India and Myanmar remained more or less stagnant until Myanmar's 1988 uprising for democracy, which was brutally crushed by the military.

In an official statement issued in the wake of the violence, India expressed its support for the "undaunted resolve of the Burmese [Myanmar] people to achieve their democracy". The Burmese language service of the state-sponsored radio station All-India Radio (AIR) became even more outspoken in its criticism of Myanmar's military government, which made it immensely popular with the population at large.

In response, Myanmar's state-run Working People's Daily newspaper began publishing outright racist articles and cartoons against AIR and ethnic Indians in general, attempting to revive the anti-kala xenophobia of the 1930s. But even then it was clear that India's hard diplomatic stand was not driven by illusions of serving as a regional guardian or promoter of democracy.

India shares a 1,371-kilometer frontier with Myanmar and ethnic insurgents fighting against New Delhi have long used under-administered territories in Myanmar as sanctuaries to conduct cross-border raids into India's sensitive northeastern areas. Myanmar's only reaction to this situation had been to mount half-hearted and essentially futile military operations against the insurgents, mainly ethnic Nagas.

It was widely believed in New Delhi in the late 1980s and early 1990s that a new democratic government in Myanmar would likely take a more tactful approach. India's sympathy for Myanmar's pro-democracy movement was further strengthened by the fact that until December 1989 its prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi, was a personal friend of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Their acquaintance dated to the early 1960s, when her mother, Daw Khin Kyi, served as Myanmar's ambassador to India. Suu Kyi's father, national independence hero Aung San, had also known Rajiv's grandfather, Nehru personally. But at the time it was also clear that India's support for Myanmar's pro-democracy forces was also guided by an Indian desire to counter its main regional rival China's growing influence with Myanmar's internationally isolated generals.

About 1993 India began to re-evaluate its strategy due to concerns that its policies had achieved little except to push 

Continued 1 2 


China no sure bet on Myanmar (Nov 8, '07)

India bends over for Myanmar's generals (Nov 6, '07)


1. Why Iran is dying for a fight

2.  Death by the light of a silverly moon

3. Iraq: Call an air strike

4.US loses wattage to China in Iraq

5. The illusion of American 'smart power'

6. Opposition steals a march in Malaysia

7. Spooks refuse to toe Cheney's line on Iran

8. Saudi monarch woos Turkey's Islamists 

9. Widgets and wrecks

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Nov 12, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110