WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Dec 13, 2007
Eurocopter braces for Indian rematch
By Sudha Ramachandran

BANGALORE - Eurocopter Group, which last week had its dreams of landing a multi-million dollar project to supply helicopters to the Indian Army abruptly shattered amidst reports of irregularities in the bidding and evaluation process, is bracing for a refight that will serve as a prelude to a US$10 billion dollar battle for control of the skies over the sub-continent.

The Eurocopter Group, a subsidiary of the European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co (EADS), almost had the US$600 million



197-helicopter deal in the bag. Technical trials had been completed and price negotiations were in progress with Indian defense ministry officials. The European company was to supply 60 helicopters made in France and Germany over the next three years, with the balance of 137 helicopters to be manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) at its Bangalore facility under a transfer of technology agreement.

Last Thursday, EADS issued a statement that an agreement with India was likely to be signed ''in a few weeks''. Then a few hours later came a statement from the Indian government. The deal had been shot down.

''The government has decided to cancel the request for proposals for 197 helicopters for the Indian Army,'' Defense Ministry spokesman Sitanshu Kar announced. The deal had been scrapped for deviation from approved parameters, he said. While declining to divulge details, he went on to say that newspaper reports about the bidding process were ''more or less correct''.

Reports in the Indian media over the past month pointed to the possible scrapping of the chopper deal with EADS due to the involvement of middlemen - who are banned from Indian defense deals - and complaints relating to the bidding process.

It appears that the machine Eurocopter fielded at the trials was not the AS 550 C3 Fennec military version of the chopper it offered in its proposal but an AS350 B3 Ecureil, a civilian variant. Defence ministry officials said the procedure for securing approval for such a `"deviation'', involving the defense minister and the Defense Procurement Board, had not been followed.

It also appeared that the chairman and managing director of Eurocopter’s distributor in India, Global Vectra Helicorp and Vectra Aviation Pvt Ltd, who acted as the go-between in the deal, is the brother of a defense officer who was among those who evaluated Eurocopter and its rivals in the bid in the year-long field trials. Eurocopter might have enjoyed an undue advantage then over its rivals, media reports pointed out.

The defence ministry forwarded a report into the allegations to the corruption watchdog, the Central Vigilance Commission, which concluded that there were ''sufficient grounds'' for scrapping the deal, leading to the government announcement last week.

Eurocopter, while confirming that it fielded for trials the AS350 B3 civilian version of the helicopter, maintains that it was exactly the same as the company's AS 550C3 military version in terms of airframe, systems, main gear box, rotor head and blades.

''We presented the civilian version of the Eurocopter in full knowledge of the army as well as Defense Ministry officials,'' Eurocopter said in a statement, drawing attention to the fact that ''in the same manner, Bell presented its civil version the B407 for trials in India".

When the tender for the deal was first put out in 2001, Eurocopter faced other contenders - Bell (a subsidiary of US-based Textron Inc), Agusta (Italy) and Kamov and Kazan (Russia). The contest then narrowed down to the Eurocopter’s AS 550 C3 Fennec versus Bell Helicopter’s Bell-407. After trials in hot, humid and high-altitude conditions, Eurocopter was chosen over Bell earlier this year.

The scrapping of the chopper deal is a big blow for EADS beyond the immediate financial value of the contract. It damages Eurocopter’s dream of also supplying helicopters to replace the ageing fleets of the Indian Air Force and Navy. It was hoping to fulfill an order pipeline estimated at around $2 billion and was eyeing the broader Indian helicopter market said to be worth around $4 billion in the next few years.

India's plans to modernize its defense will also suffer from last week's decision. as it will delay by at least another three to four years the planned replacement of the country's 1970s-vintage Chetak and Cheetah helicopters that the Eurocopter deal was intended to carry out.

While the Europeans are crestfallen and the Indian Army is worried, the Americans are probably celebrating. The buzz in the aircraft industry and in European diplomatic circles is that American pressure led to India axing the Eurocopter deal. Now the US may be back in the game.

Bell Helicopters had reportedly put up a high-powered campaign to clinch the deal. In May, Bell and American government officials met with Indian Ambassador to the US Ronan Sen to express their misgivings over the deal with Eurocopter. According to a report in Indian Express, the US government ''lodged at least two complaints with India after Bell was disqualified on what the US called 'flimsy grounds'.''

Bell was apparently disqualified in the field trials when the chopper it fielded did not meet two requirements specified in India’s request for proposals. It could not perform a three axis vector, which enables the helicopter to perform certain maneuvers to navigate in adverse weather conditions at high altitudes, and it did not have the capability to hoist a specified payload in rescue and evacuation missions.

When these shortcomings were pointed out to Bell officials, they offered to either show a video of the helicopter performing similar maneuvers in Canada or to fly out Indian officials to witness it there. This apparently was not acceptable.

Bell claims the trial process and evaluation was skewed in Eurocopter’s favor and it was these issues that it highlighted to the Indian government.

European diplomats counter that pressure that the US government put on India was not so much over the selection process but was the result of the new warming in relations between Washington and New Delhi. With the fate of a nuclear pact between India and the US still hanging in the balance, the Americans turned the screws and India succumbed to the pressure.

Meanwhile, the Europeans are now turning on the heat on India. France and Germany are said to have registered their protests with the Indian government. The French were hoping that the agreement would be signed during President Nicolas Sarkozy's visit to India next month, when he will be chief guest of the Republic Day parade.

The cancellation of the deal with Eurocopter does not mean that the contract will automatically go to Bell. The US company was officially rejected by the Indian Army and cannot be handed the deal when it failed to qualify at the trials, say defense ministry officials. India will therefore call for fresh bids in a few weeks. Bell and Eurocopter are expected to re-enter the fray - with the next round expected to be even fiercer.

For EADS, the Eurocopter-Bell battle is only part of its contest to secure contracts in India. Another arm of the aviation conglomerate builds the Eurofighter Typhoon, which is among the contenders to sell India 126 multi-role combat aircraft. The deal has been pegged at roughly $10 billion. In that race, EADS will be pitted against the United States' Lockheed Martin (F-16) and Boeing (F/A-18 Super Hornet), among others.

If the Eurocopter-Bell battle for the helicopter deal is any indication of what lies ahead for EADS, the dogfight for control of India’s skies is about to get dirtier.

Sudha Ramachandran is an independent journalist/researcher based in Bangalore.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


US exercising India's military muscles (Sep 8, '07)

Americanization of the Indian military (Jun 5, '07)


1. Iran: The wrong options on the table

2. Iran prepares to further its US 'interests'

3. Weak dollar induces a dream world 

4. Stop getting mad, America. Get smart   

5. Fighting talk from Turkey's generals 

6. Two countries, one survey 

7. The perfect storm of campaign 2008


8. Bernanke's bad-choice moment

9. Hope Now: Sorry, wrong number

10. The neo-cons strike back

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Dec 11, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110