Asia Time Online - Daily News
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese

    South Asia
     Feb 22, 2008
'Dr Kidney' arrest exposes Indian organ traffic
By Sandhya Srinivasan

MUMBAI - The arrest of "Doctor Kidney" Amit Kumar for running a sizeable racket in live kidneys has highlighted the role that South Asia plays as the hub of an international trade in human organs.

A sophisticated but unregulated healthcare industry, a "donor pool" of desperately poor people ready to sell a kidney, and a corrupt monitoring system have combined to create a special brand of "medical tourism" in the region, especially in India and neighboring Pakistan.

While India's 1994 Transplantation of Human Organs Act (THOA) is observed mostly in the breach, the impact of Pakistan's Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Ordinance passed in 2007 is yet to be gauged. Until last year, the organ trade was

legal and flourished openly in that country.

Top transplant surgeons are collaborating with criminal organ trafficking networks to target the desperate, noted Nancy Scheper-Hughes, founding director of Organs Watch, an academic research project at the University of California, Berkeley, while speaking at the Vienna Forum to Fight Human Trafficking this month.

"The latest arrests reveal a global network larger in scale than any other one," said Dr Samiran Nundy, gastroenterological surgeon at the prestigious Sir Gangaram Hospital in New Delhi. Nundy was one of the architects of India's transplantation laws that should have put an end to paid transplants in this country. The THOA was the result of activism by a small group of conscientious medical professionals appalled by the trade.

Kumar is accused of luring poor laborers to his "hospital" in the New Delhi suburb of Gurgaon with promises of job offers or large sums of money. Typically, they were promised 300,000 rupees (US$7,500) but paid only 30,000 ($750) after the surgery, police said.

He is alleged to have conducted more than 500 transplants over an unspecified period, charging up to $50,000 dollars for each operation. Investigators say his patients came from Britain, the United States, Turkey, Nepal, Dubai, Syria and Saudi Arabia.

The racket first came to light on January 24 when police raided Kumar's hospital following a complaint by a "donor" who had been paid less than the amount promised. At his hospital police found recipients recovering from surgery and arrested a number of doctors, nurses and support staff.

"Under the THOA, the powers to investigate and take action lie with the authorization committee," says Chennai-based surgeon Dr George Thomas, editor of the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, who has campaigned against the kidney trade. "However, this usually consists of government doctors without the infrastructure to investigate infringements. Many hospitals where these transplants take place are linked to politicians. And members of the authorization committee never complain to the police."

A series of investigations by the newsmagazine Frontline has documented the extent of kidney trade in various states of India, with "donors" drawn from the poorest parts of the country. State authorization committees have approved almost all the hundreds of applications for donations by non-relatives for "reasons of affection", despite clear evidence that money had changed hands.

"But Amit Kumar did not even use the legal loophole of pretending that the donors were donating out of affection for the patient," says Thomas. "He did not even bother to seek permission from the authorization committee to perform these unrelated transplants as required by THOA."

The kidney trade requires the collusion of highly trained surgeons. Kumar was the organizer of the enterprise and seems to have either hired or partnered with surgeons and other medical personnel. He had contacts all over the world who directed patients needing transplants to him, and a network of brokers all over India who ensnared poor people into parting with a kidney with promises of large rewards.

THOA was meant to stop kidney trading, and is "one of the most important pieces of medical legislation in India", said Nundy. But "to a certain extent it has been a failure though trading is much less than it was before the law".

Pakistan's law, passed last year, has been criticized as inadequate. "The ordinance came about after a struggle by professionals, civil society and the media for almost two decades against a strong pro-organ trade lobby," Dr Farhat Moazam, professor and chairperson of the Center of Biomedical Ethics and Culture at the Sind Institute for Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, told IPS by telephone.

Moazam was part of the campaign to get the law passed against what she prefers to call organ "trafficking" rather than the more neutral "trade".

"I believe it is a step in the right direction. But it needs to be strengthened in some areas and also implemented honestly and transparently if it is to work." She notes that the Indian law was a moral victory, an important statement by [Indian] society, and it has given the teeth to go after those involved in this racket. Of course, no law completely eliminates the practice.

In 2003, SIUT estimated that around 2,000 kidney transplants were done in Pakistan every year, said Moazam. Eighty percent were from unrelated donors, and, of these, almost two-thirds were done on patients from outside Pakistan.

The 2007 ordinance makes it mandatory for institutions doing transplants to register and be monitored, prohibits and provides punishments for commercial dealings in human organs as well as donation by Pakistani citizens to "citizens of other countries".

However, "donation" by non-related individuals is permitted if it is "voluntary", a term Moazam views as "vague" and prone to abuse. She also notes that since spouses may donate, "sham marriages are inevitable in an androcentric society". Finally, the same problems of corruption in giving permission for non-related "donations" exist as in the Indian law.

Although India's THOA permitted the transplant of organs from cadavers by recognizing brain death, doctors estimated that fewer than 600 organ transplants between 1994 and 2003 were cadaver-based. On average, 2,000 transplants are recorded in India annually.

One reason that the cadaver transplant program has not developed in India is that the lucrative trade in live "donations" has not been checked. Other reasons are a lack of infrastructure and public awareness. "We need the infrastructure and regulations to harvest organs from smaller hospitals, we need more publicity about cadaver donation, people don't know what brain death is, and that organs can be harvested from the brain dead," says Nundy.

"There is a poor understanding of brain death even among medical professionals," says Thomas. "We also need a system to seek and obtain consent from relatives of brain dead people. What is needed is a social movement for organ donation."

One option to increase the number of cadaver organs is the "presumed consent" policy followed by Spain, which has 31.5 donors per million population (compared to 21.2 in the US, 16.9 in France and 16.7 in Portugal). Every citizen is considered a donor unless he or she specifically opts out. "I would prefer the 'opt in' policy in India at present because the poor and less literate will not know that they can opt out," says Thomas.

"Development of deceased donor programs at least in some of the major institutions to supplement living organ donation is absolutely essential to address the needs in Pakistan," said Moazam. "But this will require raising public and professional awareness, and education."

In Pakistan, only the SIUT has carried out deceased kidney transplants, and of the 20 such transplants only six were from deceased people.

In 2007 the World Health Organization estimated that 10% of all transplants involved patients from developed countries travelling to poor countries to buy organs. They depended on local agents who "sourced" kidneys and arranged the transplant. At least 15,000 kidneys are believed to be trafficked in this way each year. While there is evidence of people being forcibly deprived of a kidney, clearly most "donors" are people in desperate need for money.

"In my opinion, organ trafficking involves societal and global issues that must be discussed within the broader paradigm of global injustices," said Moazam. "It must be a debate about communities of one kind of people being systematically exploited by communities of other kinds, both internationally and intranationally."

"This is exploitation of the worst kind, where you want to remove a body part of the poor to help a rich man survive," said Nundy.

(Inter Press Service)


1. Slouching towards Petroeurostan

2. Disinformation flies as US raises Iran bar

Wealth destruction gathers pace

4. China puppet-play a plus for Koreas

5. How never to withdraw from Iraq

6. Inflation targeting
7. Pakistan sifts through election aftermath

Blessed are the pre-emptors

9. Smart sanctions tighten on Myanmar tycoon

US military severely strained, officers say

The breakdown of Wall Street alchemy

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Feb 20, 2008)


All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110