WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Jul 16, 2008
Afghan attack resonates in Washington
By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - If nothing else, the deaths on Sunday of nine United States soldiers at a remote outpost in eastern Afghanistan close to the Pakistan border are likely to bring home to the US electorate what top national security officials have been saying for much of the past year - that the central front in Washington's "war on terror" has moved eastwards about 1,800 kilometers from Iraq.

That realization could have a major impact on the US presidential elections, despite the fact that the economy has replaced the Iraq War as the issue about which voters are most concerned.

While Republican Senator John McCain, like the White House itself, has insisted that victory in Iraq must be priority number one for US foreign policy, his presumptive Democratic rival, Senator Barack Obama, and his top advisers have repeatedly warned that

 

the situation in Afghanistan and the frontier regions of Pakistan required much more attention and resources than President George W Bush has been willing to give it.

Indeed, in a column coincidentally published by the New York Times on Monday, Obama called for a "new strategy" in Afghanistan, including the deployment there of "at least two additional combat brigades ... and more non-military assistance to accomplish the mission there". At a campaign appearance on Sunday, he called Afghanistan and the border areas "the real center for terrorist activity that we have to deal with and deal with aggressively".

The nine US soldiers died when about 200 Taliban insurgents, reportedly from Pakistan, as well as Afghanistan, penetrated a recently built outpost in Kunar province in a coordinated assault. Fifteen other US troops and four Afghan army soldiers were also wounded in the raid, which was eventually repelled after air support was called in. As many as 40 of the attackers were killed, according to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led (NATO) International Security Assistance Force in Kabul.

The US death toll was the largest since 16 troops were killed when a military helicopter was shot down by the Taliban in Kunar three years ago and, as noted by the Los Angeles Times, "accelerated what had already been a rapidly rising fatality count among coalition troops in Afghanistan".

In May and June alone, about 69 US and NATO soldiers were killed in Afghanistan, exceeding the death toll of US-led coalition troops killed in Iraq during the same period.

Sunday's attack coincided with the visit by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, to Pakistan - his fourth so far this year - to underline growing US unhappiness, and even exasperation, with Islamabad's alleged failure to prevent Taliban forces, both Afghan and Pakistani, from infiltrating into Afghanistan.

That failure is due primarily to the effective takeover during the past several years of much of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and parts of the North-West Frontier Province by Pakistan's own Taliban. It and its allies have, in turn, provided a safe haven for both Afghanistan's Taliban and al-Qaeda, which, according to the US intelligence community, has reconstituted much of its training and planning capabilities, including its capacity to mount a direct attack on the US "homeland".

Indeed, it was Mullen who warned in March, "If I were going to pick the next attack to hit the United States, it would come out of the FATA," a warning that was echoed the following month by a devastating critique by the US Congress' investigative arm, the Government Accountability Office, of what it said was the Bush administration's failure to develop a comprehensive strategy for dealing with the growing threat developing in the region.

Both Mullen and his boss, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, have made little secret of their impatience to send some 10,000 more US troops - the same number urged by Obama - to add to the 34,000 already deployed there. But, with the White House unwilling to risk the progress it has made in curbing the violence in Iraq and US ground forces already over-stretched, they say Afghanistan will have to wait until more troops are withdrawn from Iraq.

Ironically, their hopes appear to rest primarily with the current Iraq commander, General David Petraeus, who was confirmed by the senate last week as the new head of US Central Command (CENTCOM), giving him responsibility for Southwest Asia, as well as Iraq and the rest of the Middle East.

Petraeus, who has enjoyed extraordinary access to the White House and Bush himself, will take over CENTCOM at the beginning of September, after he completes a review of the situation in Iraq to determine whether he thinks it will be possible to reduce troop levels below the 140,000 that is to be reached by the end of this month.

Until recently, Petraeus had reportedly advised against any further withdrawals through the end of the year. But, with his broader CENTCOM responsibilities looming, and the continuing deterioration in Afghanistan and Pakistan, some insiders have suggested that he has become more flexible.

If so, McCain, whose chief advantage over Obama is the perception that he is stronger on national security and the "war on terror", may look as if he had underestimated the threat to the east.

Indeed, in a press release issued on Monday, the McCain campaign, citing statements by Petraeus in April and, ironically, by Osama bin Laden in 2004, reiterated that Iraq remains "the central front in the war on terrorism". Neither the release nor a teleconference by his foreign policy spokesmen mentioned Sunday's attack or the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan other than asserting that it was "an important front in the war on terror".

Obama, whose scheduled trip next week to both Iraq and Afghanistan will almost certainly dominate news coverage in the US and thus provide him with a golden opportunity to expound his views, may look prescient by September when Petraeus completes his assessment.

Jim Lobe's blog on US foreign policy, and particularly the neo-conservative influence in the Bush administration, can be read at http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/.

(Inter Press Service)


Five weddings and many funerals 
(Jul 15, '08)

Afghanistan's 'sons of the soil' rise up
(Jul 12, '08)


1. Forget those retirement plans

2. Midnight in the kindergarten
of good and evil


3. Syria basks in diplomatic breakthrough

4. Hong Kong's dirty little secret: Racism

5. With friends like these ...

6. And now, for Fannie and Freddie

7. China's veto just part of business

8. Bush outfoxed in the Iraqi sands

9. The G-8 ignores basics

10. Five weddings and many funerals

11. Just the facts

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET,Jul 14, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110