WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Aug 8, 2008
India's reforms look forlorn
By Paranjoy Guha Thakurta

NEW DELHI - Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's coalition government is no longer dependent on communist parties to complete its term in office but it may yet fail to push through market-friendly, neo-liberal economic policies - for lack of time and political consensus.

Since he took charge in May 2004, Manmohan's United Progressive Alliance (UPA), which is led by the Congress party, had been crucially dependent on the outside support of the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) and three smaller left parties for its survival.

After the left withdrew support for Manmohan last month after his

 

government went ahead with a nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States, the ruling coalition won a confidence vote in parliament amid allegations that opposition members of parliament had been "purchased" and "persuaded" by questionable means. The UPA managed to garner a majority thanks to the support of a regional political party, the Samajwadi Party, and other small political formations and independent lawmakers.

Manmohan and his finance minister, Harvard-educated lawyer Palaniappan Chidambaram, are ardent votaries of neo-liberal economic policies. But their hands were tied because the communist parties effectively held veto power over the government. Some important economic policy initiatives opposed by the left parties are:
  • Raising the cap on foreign direct investment (FDI) in insurance companies from 26% at present to 49%.
  • Creating a new regulator for pension funds to break the monopoly of the government-owned Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) and allowing pension funds to be invested in stock markets.
  • Allowing the central government's equity holding in public sector banks to come down below 50%.
  • Capping voting rights of foreign investors in Indian banks to 10% irrespective of the size of their shareholding.
  • Allowing FDI in multi-brand retail outlets.
  • Changing labor laws, in particular, the Industrial Disputes Act.
  • Increasing the involvement of the private sector in mining, including coal mining.
  • Sale of equity shares in major public sector undertakings.

    On July 31, speaking at a book release function, Chidambaram said: "I have no doubt in my mind that the leadership of parties will assert itself. And, we will take the legislative agenda forward in areas where we agree."

    However, analysts believe that many of the policy changes that require legislative approval may not come through.

    Although the principal opposition party, the right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), is ideologically inclined towards economic reforms, it is at present reluctant to support the government. Party spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad has gone on record saying: "We have serious reservations about the legitimacy of this government."

    On July 29, after the EPFO board of trustees HSBC, ICICI (formerly Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India), Prudential and Reliance Capital as asset managers to break the monopoly of the government-owned State Bank of India, parties on both the left (CPI-M) and the right (BJP) cried foul.

    The BJP and the CPI-M alleged that Reliance Capital had been included at a "late stage" to "favor" its head, Anil Ambani, according to Forbes magazine the world's sixth-richest man, who is close to Amar Singh, general secretary of the Samjawadi Party - which bailed the government out after the left withdrew its support. The government denied the allegation.

    The impetus behind any reform movement has also been questioned.

    "Even if one could expect some forward movement in policy changes for the insurance sector reforms, other policy initiatives such as higher foreign investment limits have less to do with what is perceived to be economic reforms and more to do with pressures exerted by lobbies within India and abroad," said Laveesh Bhandari, director of Indicus Analytics, an economic research firm based in New Delhi.

    Bhandari also argued that the left wing within the Congress can be expected to oppose policy changes that are seen to be a consequence of American influence. "The government is already under attack for the nuclear deal with the US and may not do anything that will be seen as an outcome of lobbying by pressure groups such as American insurance companies."

    A K Bhattacharya, group managing editor of the Business Standard newspaper said another important reason why many economic policy changes may not come through is simply lack of time. "The next general elections have to be held by April but could take place earlier," he said. "The policy priorities of the government will be focused on containing inflation and little else since it is in election mode".

    Amending labor laws and increasing the cap on foreign direct investment for insurers require a consensus across ideological lines that is lacking in India's charged and fractious political atmosphere.

    Other economic factor are also negative. Bhattacharya said the government is unlikely to sell shares of public sector companies at this juncture when stock market indices are low and volatile. "The government would be foolish to sell shares now and be accused by its political opponents of selling family silver at a cheap rate," he said.

    Even so, if there is no consensus across political parties in India and within them on the benefits of liberalization, privatization and globalization, there is a huge area of agreement on many economic issues, notably the need to improve both the country's physical infrastructure (to ensure availability of electricity, water and improved roads) as well as its social infrastructure (basic health-care and elementary education).

    In the run-up to the elections, supporters of the government will emphasis its "populist" programs such as a farm-loan waiver scheme and an employment-guarantee scheme in rural areas. where the incumbent regime is fighting to retain support among poor voters whose real incomes have rapidly shrunk in recent months because of high food prices.

    (Inter Press Service)

  • Delhi risks a stumble at the finish line (Aug 5, '08)

    Reluctant gambler hits Indian jackpot
    (Jul 24, '08)


    1. Nowhere to hide

    2. India as a US hedge against China

    3. Olympics mark China's second coming

    4. Syria exploits US loopholes

    5. Pakistan's problems spill into India

    6. Maestro won't face the music

    7. Bernanke wins a bit of time

    8. Israeli pre-emption better than cure

    9. The collapse of consumer spending

    10. False signs of the end

    11. China wary of a 'normal' Japan

    12. Henry Paulson has lost control

    (24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Aug 6, 2008)

     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
    Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110