WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Jan 13, 2009
SPEAKING FREELY
Early fears for Afghanistan's elections
By Sharif Ghalib

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

Afghans are increasingly alarmed over the international community's half-hearted approach towards the historic elections that the nation is constitutionally bound to convene early this year.

The emerging alarm is broadly shared by the political parties, independent politicians and candidates known to be planning to

 

contest the ballot. It first surfaced last year, when the country's election body recommended that both presidential and parliamentary elections be held jointly to cut costs.

Parliament was quick to challenge the recommendation as unconstitutional, and this led to a decision by the government to hold separate presidential and parliamentary elections in 2009 and 2010 respectively, in conformity with the constitution.

Despite this, government officials have also continuously implied and still are that the elections - slated for the spring 2009 according to the constitution - may yet be delayed until autumn this year (security permitting), reiterating insecurity and fears of a low voter registration.

But lawmakers citing reports by the Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan (IEC) of possibly high turnouts across the country, and the smooth progress of the registration process, have passed a unanimous motion calling any delay in the poll a breach of the constitution.

The IEC is currently in the midst of a vast voter registration drive poised to enter its fourth and last phase covering four restive southern provinces, which is expected to end in early February.

All the same, to follow the indications the IEC has been making more frequently of late, it appears that there is no let up in sight in the mounting wrangle between the government and the legislature over the controversy.

But what seems more intriguing to political stakeholders and the general public at large, is the erratic silence by the international community over this crucial issue, which is arguably the underlying goal of its declared stabilization and democratization campaign in the country.

The 2009 election will be only the second direct vote for the presidency in Afghanistan's history, after the 2004 election when President Hamid Karzai won a five-year term.

The poll embodies unique historic significance for the people of Afghanistan, as does the international community's commitment to its implementation and safeguarding of its integrity.

The popular demand that the election to be held on the fixed date is widely considered to be part and parcel of that integrity, which makes it no lesser important than the election itself. Thus, a great many view the unwarranted delay as an infringement upon the constitution.

But why are elections so important for Afghans today? Perhaps the answer could be traced to the history of the country. Generations of Afghans both old and young, still carry recollections of how successive autocratic and oligarchic regimes perpetuated their rule by choosing the bullet over the ballot.

Luckily, however, now Afghanistan is destined for a new future. Seven years since the inception of the historic governance process started by the Bonn agreement, and despite all the inadequacies, shortcomings and at times wrongdoings, today the country has made great strides in alleviating the gruesome memories of the past by laying the foundation of a modern representative and inclusive democracy.

And it is precisely because of these in-depth and far-reaching changes, which have set out a new course for Afghanistan, that the government and especially the international community - by virtue of the sway it holds over the situation - must steadfastly follow through with this process. They both must do their utmost to bring about permissive conditions for timely, free and fair elections in strict adherence to Afghanistan's constitution.

Let's keep in mind that the consequences of not convening the presidential election this year would be dire, and excusing this over 'insecurity or budgetary strain' would be a tough sell. A failure to ensure security and to create conducive environment for the completion of the ongoing registration process and the subsequent ballot, would hardly justify the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's surging military presence in the country in the eyes of the Afghans. As would a lack of funding for the election.

Also, this would bring into question the continuity of the overall peace process, threatening the existing national and political cohesion. It will put at risk the legitimacy of the political setup beyond the election date, inflict serious damage on the faith of the people in the constitution, and affect their confidence in the sanctity of the government as an institution. Furthermore, it will set a dangerous precedent for the future governance of Afghanistan.

Last but not least, such a failure would put the legacy of Karzai, in his capacity as the first-ever democratically-elected head of state of Afghanistan, at stake. Having broken new ground in serving his nation with integrity until now, he is obliged to lead by example in upholding the nation's constitution and fulfilling his constitutional mandate to duly hold the presidential election.

Indeed, this will serve application of the rule of law as the principle of legitimate exercise of authority by future Afghan governments.

Sharif Ghalib served at the UN for 10 years, and was the first Afghan diplomat to negotiate the establishment of full bilateral diplomatic and consular relations between Afghanistan and Canada at resident-embassy level. He opened the Embassy of Afghanistan in Ottawa in late 2002 and served as the country's charge d'affaires and minister counselor until 2005. He is the honorary president of the Canadian Afghan Council (CAC). He can be reached via e-mail: sharif_sahmas@yahoo.ca

(Copyright 2009 Sharif Ghalib.)

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.


A high cost for more feet on the ground (Jan 7,'09)

Surging towards stalemate in Afghanistan 
(Jan 7,'09)

All roads lead out of Afghanistan
(Dec 19,'08)


1. Satyam fraud check switches to PwC

2. Panic could herald dollar rout

3. Washington loses a vital link

4. Obama, soccer and South Asian security

5. Suicide by Israel

6. Rocket strikes reveal new foe in Lebanon

7. Russian arms to Iran: A mistimed gambit?

8. China's reluctance to reform

9. Fed churns on

10. China's rich are too fast, too furious

(Jan 9-11, 2009)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110