Asia Time Online - Daily News
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese

    South Asia
     Feb 24, 2010
Strike reverberates beyond Afghanistan
By Charles Fromm

WASHINGTON - Amid growing European discontent over the war in Afghanistan, the head of United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) forces apologized on Monday for an air strike that killed at least 27 civilians in the central part of the country on Sunday.

"We are extremely saddened by the tragic loss of innocent lives," General Stanley McChrystal, commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), said in a statement. "I have made it clear to our forces that we are here to protect the Afghan people, and inadvertently killing or injuring civilians undermines their trust and confidence in our mission."

McChrystal continued: "We will re-double our efforts to regain that trust."

Sunday's attack consisted of a US helicopter firing on several


vehicles as they traveled towards Kandahar, the largest city in southern Afghanistan.

The political implications of the attack, which, according to some reports was carried out by helicopter-borne US Special Operations Forces (SOF), could be serious, not just in Afghanistan itself but also in Europe and Canada, were electorates have become increasingly opposed to their militaries' involvement in the war.

This is especially true in the Netherlands, whose government collapsed on Saturday amid negotiations on whether to keep troops in Afghanistan. The air strike took place in a district controlled by the Dutch army, whose role, if any, in the attack has yet to be clarified.

The attack was carried out on the apparently mistaken belief that a convoy of vehicles was transporting Taliban fighters toward eastern Helmand province, where US and allied forces have launched a major offensive. That it took place in an area where Dutch forces are concentrated is likely to strengthen those factions in the Netherlands opposing any extension in The Hague's participation in the war beyond August.

The Dutch troops have been central in the war effort, despite their low numbers. The New York Times reported last week that the Netherlands - whose troop contribution to the Afghanistan mission is one of the highest per capita - has been subject to a higher casualty rate than other coalition forces, including the US, because of its troop postings in the dangerous southern province of Oruzgan.

This is the most lethal incident in which civilians were killed by US-led forces since last September, when a German-ordered air strike on fuel tankers hijacked by the Taliban killed 140 people, the majority of whom were civilians. The strike at the weekend came despite the implementation of stricter rules of engagement regarding strikes ordered by McChrystal last summer when he took command of NATO/ISAF. ISAF officials insisted on Monday that the attack is being investigated to determine whether it violated those rules of engagement.

In a statement released on Monday, ISAF officials said, "Yesterday, a group of suspected insurgents, believed to be en route to attack a joint Afghan-ISAF unit, was engaged by an airborne weapons team resulting in a number of individuals killed and wounded. After the joint ground force arrived at the scene and found women and children, they transported the wounded to medical treatment facilities."

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has frequently condemned the killings of civilians by US and NATO forces but has found himself largely powerless in terms of effecting change.

"The repeated killing of civilians by NATO forces is unjustifiable, we strongly condemn it," Karzai's cabinet said in a statement issued in Kabul. It said 27 civilians, "including four women and one child", were killed in the attack.

In another effort to improve the perception of ISAF forces, McChrystal revised the rules of engagement last summer to counter the rising numbers of civilian deaths attributed to coalition troops, and the increasing resentment toward his occupying army and the corrupt Afghan government that accompanies it. The shift in policy restricted the use of air strikes to situations where coalition forces were in imminent danger.

Though McChrystal's policy is thought to be responsible for a downturn in the number of civilian casualties, it is not clear that this has translated into meaningful improvements for everyday Afghans. According to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), the number of civilian casualties caused by coalition forces dropped by a third last year. However, the number of people killed by the Taliban and other militants rose by about 40%. The result is that the number of civilian deaths has increased 15% since last year, according to UNAMA.

In another effort to mitigate popular backlash surrounding these deadly attacks, a compensation system for death, injury or damage resulting from coalition operations was devised. According to the Associated Press, the death of a child or adult is worth US$1,500 to $2,500, loss of limb and other injuries $600 to $1,500, a damaged or destroyed vehicle $500 to $2,500, and damage to a farmer's fields $50 to $250.

The protection of the population is central to the coalition forces' mission in Afghanistan, according to McChrystal's statement.

As long as violence persists, it becomes almost irrelevant who is causing it, says David Wood, a veteran US war correspondent. "The perception among most Afghans is that the United States is responsible when Afghans are killed," he wrote last week in Politics Daily.

"It may seem counterproductive for the Taliban to deliberately kill civilians, as their strategic goal is to win the support of the population against the government in Kabul and its foreign backers. But counter-insurgency experts say intimidation tactics are extremely effective - at least for a while."

UNAMA reported that 2009 was the deadliest year for civilians in Afghanistan since the toppling of the Taliban regime by US forces in 2001.

This latest incident comes during the largest offensive yet for US-led coalition and Afghan forces, which have been fighting to secure the former Taliban stronghold of Marjah in southern Helmand province.

(Inter Press Service)

Anger spreads on Marjah's front line
(Feb 23, '10)

Two cities and the Afghan insurgency
(Feb 19, '10)

1. American blitzkrieg

2. Death by trillions of dollars

3. Taliban's mood swings against talks

4. Anger spreads on Marjah's front line

5. The man behind Turkey's strategic depth

6. Japan beset by auto apathy

7. Brazilians feel squeeze amid China 'success'

8. The case for an Israeli
strike against Iran

9. The beginning of tightening?

10. India's red rebels pose 'biggest threat'

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Feb 22, 2010)


All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110