WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Dec 9, 2010


Varanasi blast breaks terror lull
By Sudha Ramachandran

BANGALORE - The relative lull in terror attacks in India has been broken by a blast at Varanasi in northern India on Tuesday.

A two-year-old child was killed and five others were injured in the explosion, while about 20 people, including several foreigners, were injured in the stampede that it triggered.

The blast, caused by an improvised explosive device (IED) placed in a milk container, took place on the paved steps of the Sitala Ghat, adjacent to the more famous Dashashwamedh Ghat and near Varanasi's famous Kashi-Vishwanath temple. Another device

 
was reportedly found nearby. Indian Mujahideen, the local unit of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e Taiba, claimed responsibility.

The timing of the attack is significant. It occurred shortly after 6 pm on Tuesday during the aarti on the banks of the river Ganga. The Ganga aarti is a ritual where men holding lamps dance in unison to chanting of Hindu prayers. The patterns that the flickering flames weave and their reflections in the Ganga, India's holiest river, are spectacular and tens of thousands of Hindu worshippers and tourists alike assemble every evening to watch the performance. The Ganga aarti on Tuesday is a particularly huge draw.

The perpetrators of the attack timed it to cause maximum distress. Not only did the IED go off at that time of the day when the banks of the Ganga were most crowded, but also they struck on a Tuesday, a day particularly auspicious to worshippers of Hanuman. One of the most important temples in Varanasi, the Sankat Mochan temple, is dedicated to the Hindu deity.

The attack at Varanasi took place a day after the 18th anniversary of the demolition of the Babri Masjid at Ayodhya. A 16th century mosque that was built by the Moghul king Babar, the Babri Masjid was reportedly built after a temple that marked the place of birth of the Hindu deity, Ram, was razed. The site was therefore disputed. On December 6, 1992, Hindu extremists of various Sangh Parivar (a family of Hindu outfits) organizations demolished the mosque.

That Tuesday's blast was linked to the Babri Masjid demolition and to a recent court verdict on the disputed site is evident from an e-mail message that the Indian Mujahideen sent to media outlets on Tuesday.

On September 30, the high court in Allahabad divided the disputed site into three, awarding two-thirds to two Hindu plaintiffs representing Lord Ram and the Nimrohi Akhara, and a third to the Sunni Muslim Waqf Board. The court ruled that a Hindu temple had existed at the site since the 12th century and maintained that the portion under the central dome of the mosque was the birthplace of Lord Ram "as per faith and belief of the Hindus".

While the verdict was hailed by some as a compromise solution that gave something to both religious communities, it was criticized too for basing the decision in what was a property dispute not on evidence or facts but on the more nebulous "faith and belief of the Hindus".

"Allahabad High Court's verdict of 'Aastha [faith] over Facts' is exemplary of the bias[ed] judiciary although Ram is a mythical figure," the Indian Mujahideen said in its e-mail. Accusing the judiciary of bias, it said the "Supreme Court, the High Courts, the lower courts and all the Commissions have utterly failed to play an impartial role regarding Muslim issues." Muslim victims of "pre-planned riots, arson, rapes, losses of lives and properties are still awaiting justice." Cases filed by Muslims who suffered in the 2002 pogrom in Gujarat continue to drag in court, with many of the guilty still roaming free.

In the e-mail, the Indian Mujahideen warned Muslim scholars and organizations not to negotiate a compromise on the disputed site. "All India Muslim Personal Law Board nor the Babri Masjid Action Committee nor the Sunni Waqf Board nor any litigant has any right to alter or compromise on any of these aspects whatsoever regarding the Babri Masjid. All sorts of bartering and bargaining is totally unacceptable to Allah and thus to the Muslims", it said.

The e-mail warned that any attempt at building a temple where the mosque once stood would attract attacks.

The Indian Mujahideen has claimed responsibility for several attacks since its emergence in 2008. It was behind a string of serial blasts in various Indian cities including Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Delhi and Jaipur in 2008, and in Pune this year. As well as the Lashkar-e-Taiba, it is believed to have links with the Students Islamic Movement of India.

The temple town of Varanasi has been the site of previous attacks. On March 7, 2006, at least 26 people were killed and over a hundred injured when blasts occurred almost simultaneously at the Sankat Mochan temple and the Varanasi railway station. As in 2010, the 2006 blasts at Varanasi were at around 6.20 pm on a Tuesday.

Since the attacks in Mumbai in November 2008, terrorists have carried out only two major strikes in India - one at the German bakery in Pune in February this year and another in September when two Taiwanese tourists were injured in a shoot-out by assailants on a motorbike near Delhi's famous Jama Masjid. The attack in Varanasi was the first since the Ayodhya verdict.

By choosing Varanasi to protest the Ayodhya verdict, the Indian Mujahideen are sending out a clear message to Hindu right-wing extremists.

Varanasi is not just another temple town on the river Ganga. It is the most sacred town to Hindus. More importantly, it is the site of the Kashi Vishwanath temple, among the most sacred to Hindus. Next to the Kashi Vishwanath temple stands the Gyanvapi Masjid.

It is believed that the original site of the Kashi Vishwanath temple was the land on which the Gyanvapi mosque now stands. The original temple was destroyed in 1669 by Aurangzeb, Babar's great-great grandson and the rubble of that temple was used to build the mosque.

Along with another temple-mosque site in Mathura, believed to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Krishna, the disputed site in Varanasi has been described by the Sangh Parivar, the Hindu nationalists, as "future Ayodhyas". That is, these sites like the one at Ayodhya were once the location of temples that were destroyed and so the mosques that stand there now, can expect to face the same fate as the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya.

Within hours of the court issuing the controversial verdict on Ayodhya, Sangh Parivar activists were heard chanting: "Ayodhya ho gayee hamari, ab Kashi-Mathura ki bari," meaning "Ayodhya has become ours, now it is the turn of Kashi-Mathura". Kashi is another name for Varanasi. Parivar leaders have called on Muslims to hand over the disputed land in Varanasi and Mathura to the Hindus.

Tuesday's attack in Varanasi was the Indian Mujahideen's response to that call.

Sudha Ramachandran is an independent journalist/researcher based in Bangalore.

(Copyright 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Fires of Indian temple row stoked again
Oct 26, '10

Jihadis set to spill over into Kashmir
Jul 21, '10

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110