Asia Time Online - Daily News
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese

    South Asia
     May 5, 2011

How Bush gave Osama a free pass
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON - When George W Bush rejected a Taliban offer to have Osama bin Laden tried by a moderate group of Islamic states in mid-October 2001, he gave up the only opportunity the United States would have to end Bin Laden's terrorist career for the next nine years.

The al-Qaeda leader was able to escape into Pakistan a few weeks later because the Bush administration had no military plan to capture him.

The last Taliban foreign minister, Wakil Ahmed Muttawakil, offered at a secret meeting in Islamabad on October 15, 2001, to put Bin Laden in the custody of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to be tried for the 9/11 terror attacks on the

United States, Muttawakil told Inter Press Service (IPS) in an interview in Kabul last year.

The OIC is a moderate, Saudi-based organization representing all Islamic countries. A trial of Bin Laden by judges from OIC member countries might have dealt a more serious blow to al-Qaeda's Islamic credentials than anything the United States would have done with him.

Muttawakil also dropped a condition that the United States provide evidence of Bin Laden's guilt in the 9/11 attacks, which had been raised in late September and reiterated by Taliban ambassador to Pakistan Abdul Salam Zaeef on October 5 - two days before the US bombing of Taliban targets began.

There had been sketchy press reports at the time that the Taliban foreign minister had made a new offer in Islamabad to have Bin Laden tried by one or more foreign countries. No Taliban or former Taliban official, however, had provided details of what had actually been proposed until Muttawakil's revelation.

Muttawakil, who was detained at Bagram airbase for 18 months after the ouster of the Taliban regime and now lives in Kabul with the approval of the Hamid Karzai government, told IPS he had also offered a second alternative - a "special court" to try Bin Laden that Afghanistan and two other Islamic governments would establish.

Muttawakil was believed by US officials to have had the trust of Taliban leader Mullah Omar. A December 1998 cable from the US Embassy in Islamabad said he was "considered Omar's closest adviser on political issues" and that he had become Omar's "point man" on foreign affairs in 1997.

The new Taliban negotiating offer came almost immediately after the US began bombing Taliban targets on October 7, 2001. The fear of the bombing - and what was likely to follow - evidently spurred the Taliban leadership to be more forthcoming on Bin Laden.

But Bush brusquely rejected any talks on the Taliban proposal, declaring, "They must have not heard. There's no negotiations."

Bush rejected the Taliban offer despite the fact that US intelligence had picked up reports in the previous months of deep divisions within the Taliban regime over Bin Laden. It was because of those reports that Bush had authorized secret meetings by a CIA officer with a high-ranking Taliban official in late September.

Former CIA director George Tenet recalled in his memoirs that the CIA station chief in Pakistan, Robert Grenier, met with Mullah Osmani, the second ranking Taliban official, in Balochistan province of Pakistan.

But Grenier was only authorized to offer Osmani three options: turning Bin Laden over to the United States; letting the Americans find him on their own; or a third option, as Tenet described it, to "administer justice themselves, in a way that clearly took him off the table".

Osmani rejected those three options, as well as a subsequent proposal by Grenier on October 2 that he oust Mullah Omar from power and publicly announce on the radio that Bin Laden would be handed over to the United States immediately.

On October 3, Bush publicly ruled out negotiations with the Taliban. They had to "turn over the al-Qaeda organization living in Afghanistan and must destroy the terrorist camps", he said, adding "There are no negotiations."

Milton Bearden, the former CIA station chief in Pakistan during the Mujahideen war against the Soviets, observed to the Washington Post two weeks after Bush had rejected Muttawakil's new offer that the Taliban needed a face-saving way of resolving the issue consistent with its Islamic values.

"We never heard what they were trying to say," Bearden said.

The Bush refusal to negotiate with the Taliban was in effect a free pass for Bin Laden and his lieutenants because the Bush administration had no plan of its own for apprehending him in Afghanistan. It did not even know what level of military effort would have been required for the United States to be able to block Bin Laden's exit routes from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

The absence of any military planning to catch Bin Laden was a function of Bush's national security team, led by vice president Dick Cheney and secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld, which had firmly opposed any military operation in Afghanistan that would have had any possibility of catching Bin Laden and his lieutenants.

Rumsfeld and the second-ranking official at the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, had dismissed CIA warnings of an al-Qaeda terrorist attack against the United States in the summer of 2001, and even after 9/11 had continued to question the CIA's conclusion that Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were behind the attacks.

Cheney and Rumsfeld were determined not to allow a focus on Bin Laden to interfere with their plan for a US invasion of Iraq to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime.

Even after Bush decided in favor of an Afghan campaign, Tommy Franks, commander of the US Central Command and responsible for the war in Afghanistan, was not directed to have a plan for Bin Laden's capture or to block his escape to Pakistan.

When the CIA received intelligence on November 12, 2001, that Bin Laden had left Kandahar and was headed for a cave complex in the Tora Bora Mountains close to the Pakistani border, Franks had no assets in place to do anything about it. He asked Lieutenant General Paul T Mikolashek, commander of Army Central Command (ARCENT), if he could provide a blocking force between al-Qaeda and the Pakistani border, according to Colonel David W Lamm, who was then commander of ARCENT Kuwait.

But that was impossible, because ARCENT had neither the troops nor the strategic lift in Kuwait required to put such a force in place.

Franks then had to ask for Pakistani military help in blocking Bin Laden's exit into Pakistan, as Rumsfeld told a National Security Council meeting, according to the meeting transcript in Bob Woodward's book Bush at War.

But Rumsfeld and other key advisers knew it would a charade, because Bin Laden was a long-time ally of the Pakistani intelligence service, the ISI, and the Pakistani military was not about to help capture him.

Franks asked Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf to deploy troops along the Afghan-Pakistan border near Tora Bora, and Musharraf agreed to redeploy 60,000 troops to the area from the border with India, according to US ambassador Wendy Chamberlin, who was present at the meeting.

But the Musharraf said his army would need airlift assistance from the United States to carry out the redeployment. That would have required an entire aviation brigade, including hundreds of helicopters, and hundreds of support troops to deliver that many combat troops to the border region, according to Lamm.

Those were assets the US military did not have in the theater.

Osama bin Laden had been effectively guaranteed an exit to Pakistan by a Bush policy that had rejected either diplomatic or military means to do anything about him.

In an implicit acknowledgement that the administration had not been seriously concerned with apprehending Bin Laden, Bush declared in a March 13, 2002, press conference that Bin Laden was "a person who's now been marginalized", and added, "You know, I just don't spend that much time on him."

Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specializing in US national security policy. The paperback edition of his latest book, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, was published in 2006.

(Inter Press Service)

Pakistan has a price to pay
(May 3, '11)

Deathly figures wait in the wings
(May 3, '11)

1. Bin Laden a casualty of the Arab revolt

2. Pakistan has a price to pay

3. Obama/Osama rock the casbah

4. Osama's al-Qaeda ready for a fight

5. Summer war in the Middle East?

6. Bali bomber may have been vital link

7. Deathly figures wait in the wings

8. Dying for TEPCO

9. Rand's revolution

10. Egypt shakes up Middle Eastern order

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, May 3, 2011)


All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110