Indonesia
rethinks tourism, terrorism
By Gary LaMoshi
DENPASAR, Bali - Muslim extremists have been convicted of the bombings that
left 202 dead in Bali last October and which devastated Indonesia's tourism
industry. Now, they're making another assault that's legal but potentially more
damaging.
Justice and Human Rights Minister Yusril Izha Mahendra, who advocates turning
Indonesia into an Islamic state, is spearheading a campaign that would further
depress tourism by slashing eligibility for free visas upon arrival. At
present, passport holders from 48 countries and territories can get a 60-day
visa without a fee when they enter the country. Current visa eligibles include
Indonesia's leading tourist sources - Japan, Australia, the United States and
European Union countries, plus up-and-coming Taiwan.
Under a Presidential Decree originally slated to take effect on March 31,
passports from only 11 countries would entitle holders to free visas on
arrival. That list includes Indonesia's comrades in the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Thailand, Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, the
Philippines and Vietnam, plus Hong Kong, Macau, Chile, Peru and Morocco - a
list that represents a tiny fraction of Indonesia's current tourist arrivals.
Rules for the new policy haven't been issued yet, but Mahendra has declared a
December 1 deadline for implementation. The latest reports - which change more
often than the weather forecast - say nationals of 23 countries will be able to
obtain 30-day visas upon arrival, with a 15-day extension available.
Entry fee
Those visas would carry a price tag, though, variously reported as US$20, $30
and $50. The fees would be payable in cash at ports of entry, meaning these
charges couldn't be hidden in airline tickets under the term "taxes and fees".
Immigration officials at Bali's Ngurah Rai International Airport are busy
constructing new booths for fee collection; Mercedes-Benz dealers (and
smugglers) are likely drooling.
Tourism-industry leaders criticize the new visa policy for hitting them when
they're down (see Bali:
Help me get my feet back on the ground, July 9). Bomb-blasted Bali,
which still drives the $5 billion industry and relies on visitors for up to 80
percent of its jobs and incomes, is leading the charge with demonstrations,
coalition-building with industry stakeholders in other regions and lobbying in
Jakarta.
Industry figures show that international arrivals fell nearly 40 percent in the
first eight months of this year compared with 2002. "We are in trouble," John M
Daniels, head of Bali Discovery Tours, told an industry forum on Saturday. "We
are in a depression." Daniels recalled trying to sell Bali to a convention
group of 3,000 people and facing the visa issue: "How do I explain that extra
$150,000 they need to budget?"
Or membolehkan makan kue
Mahendra's answer: hotels should give visitors free rooms, restaurants free
meals, tour operators free trips. Now you know how to say "let them eat cake"
in Bahasa Indonesia.
So what is the point of the new visa proposal? The official reasons of visa
abuse by tourists - isolated cases, which fees won't stop - and reciprocity
don't make sense. One rumor making the rounds is that during a visit to
Australia last year, airport security screeners forced Mahendra to remove his
shoes. As a result, he vowed revenge for this show of disrespect, or so the
story goes. While the proposed changes would inconvenience and annoy some
Australian and other tourists, the real victims would be Indonesians in the
tourist industry.
More specifically, the victims would be predominantly based in Bali. The Bali
bombings didn't just depress tourism, they further complicated its political
distress, which hinges on tension between predominantly Hindu Bali and
overwhelmingly Muslim Java and the rest of Indonesia. Initially, sympathy for
Bali's tragedy was great, and it prompted a rush from leaders to distance
themselves from Muslim radicals (see Indonesia
doth protest too little, March 29). Nearly a year later - and just a
year ahead of presidential elections - some of that sympathy has given way to
resentments old and new.
A policy that targets Westerners and hurts Bali could be an irresistible
populist two-fer for Mahendra and his Crescent Star Party (PBB by its
Indonesian acronym), which advocates turning Indonesia into an Islamic state.
Western visitors (the diversions they bring and those that cater to them) plus
Bali's 3.5 million Hindus represent obstacles standing between PBB and its
goal.
Fringe festival
Events over the past two years, but especially during 2003, have increased
Indonesian Muslims' sense of grievance and victimization (see
Unhappy anniversary for US-Indonesia ties, September 11).
politicians as well as Islamic leaders continuously assert that the
overwhelming majority of Indonesian Muslims are moderates, yet they are
increasingly unwilling to denounce those few extremists spewing hate. They may
have learned that from US primary election candidates who play to their
parties' fringes, since they are the ones most likely to turn out and persuade
like-minded people to go to the polls.
Politicians across the spectrum understand the strategy and now play both sides
of the terrorism issue. Along with browbeating police for security lapses, a
parliamentary hearing this week grilled National Police Chief Da'i Bachtiar
over the arrests of 13 alleged terror plotters. The legislators' complaints
echoed those publicized by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and Abu Bakar
Ba'asyir’s Indonesian Mudjahidin Council (parading the detainees' covered,
cowering wives before cameras). MUI, recognized as a mainstream
organization, previously denounced the four-year sentence against Ba'asyir
handed down this month. An emerging revisionist myth is that recent terror
attacks are the fault of Westerners, not the Indonesians doing the bombing.
President Megawati Sukarnoputri, who enjoyed overwhelming support in Bali in
1999, has opted to skip next month's Bali bomb anniversary ceremony. Whispers
are that she wants to snub Australian Prime Minister John Howard, who plans to
attend the memorial service. The real thinking may be that there aren't many
votes to be won from standing with Bali or Western terror victims and a great
many Muslim votes that might be lost. By the way, it was Megawati who signed
the Presidential Decree on the new visa rules, but no one expects her to
explain her actions.
Whatever the intentions of Mahendra and Megawati, the new visa rules will hurt
the whole Indonesian economy, not just Bali's Hindus. The delay in implementing
the new rule suggests that someone high up understands that. If pandering to
extremists sets the stage for yet another deadly terror strike, the impact will
be even more devastating. There are few signs that any Indonesian leader
understands that, and such figures are less likely to emerge as election days
draws closer.
(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact
content@atimes.com for information on our
sales and syndication policies.)
|