HONG KONG - At the ministerial preparatory
meeting held this week in Putrayjaya, Kuala Lumpur, the
Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) tried to appear
upbeat despite the many problems confronting the Islamic
world.
It sought to show unity by calling for
the eviction of United States forces from Iraq. However,
Turkey's decision to provide troops to Iraq, which is
represented in the conference by the US-sanctioned
interim Iraqi Governing Council, triggered divisions
within the organization.
Seeking to divert
divisions, outgoing Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir
Mohamad, who was chairing the conference, spoke about
the need for Muslim countries to increase their trade
with each other.
Mahathir, whose combative
rhetoric has often put him at loggerheads with the West,
has been deemed the future secretary general of the OIC.
Although Mahathir has himself quietly turned down the
offer, word has it that he has secretly nominated
another Malaysian, one with the necessary foreign policy
expertise, to take over.
Aware that the OIC's
problems were beyond the resolution of anyone, Syed
Hamid Albar, the foreign minister of Malaysia, has
affirmed that the OIC needs to come up with "practical
measures of cooperation" first. To which he also added
that he has begun to harbor fears that there would be a
lot of expectations on Malaysia's chairmanship of the
OIC.
"We hope OIC members will make decisions on
the basis of common will, rather than look at their
vested bilateral interests. Malaysia alone cannot change
the OIC," he pointed out.
Although the OIC
serves to represent the ummah (the Islamic
community), James Piscatori, a professor in
international relations at Oxford University, has long
argued that the Islamic world rallies more to causes
that resonate with national interests than pan-Islamic
ones. Events dating back to 1969, the year when OIC was
first conceived, has shown his insights to be prescient.
In his book Islam and the Nation-State,
he showed that the foreign policy of some of the most
Islamic countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and
Iran, were each driven by their parochial national
interest rather than Islamic ones.
Thus, while
the OIC's aspirational goals include promoting the
collective welfare of the Islamic world, caught as it is
by the hegemony of the United States, the OIC's
decisions cannot be aversed to member states' national
prerogative too. In fact, the latter always dominate.
Hence, the track record of the OIC has always been
filled with inconsistency.
Although the OIC has
risen up to the challenge to speak of the plight of
Muslims, as marked by its effort in highlighting ethnic
cleansing in Bosnia in 1992, its performance has always
been uneven. During the Bosnian conflict, while the OIC
tried to be actively involved, its role was marginal at
best. Clamped by the US and the European Union (EU), the
OIC found itself immobilized in Bosnia on many fronts.
The arms embargo on Bosnia was not lifted during
the first two years of the conflict, resulting in
Bosnians' wide-scale massacre at the hands of the
marauding Serbian forces. In the end, members of the OIC
had to illegally ship a cache of arms into Bosnia, in
defiance of a UN resolution barring such arms transfer.
In March, the OIC held an extraordinary summit
in Qatar in which it "totally rejected" the
then-anticipated US-led invasion of Iraq. But OIC
members such as Kuwait and Qatar allowed the use of
their territory by US troops in the buildup to the war.
Only a handful of Islamic heads of state or government
turned up at that one-day meeting too.
Lately,
even the admissions standards of the OIC have become
unclear. In the current meeting, Russia, a predominantly
Christian country with 20 million Muslims, has been
accepted as an observer of the impending OIC summit on
Thursday and Friday.
While Syed Hamid Akbar, the
foreign minister of Malaysia, claimed that this is
"procedurally correct" in that President Vladimir Putin
was making an official visit to Malaysia anyway, hence
making him the official guest of the country, Russia's
future inclusion in the OIC has not been ruled out.
Talks have been rife that if Gabon, a non-Muslim
country, can be accepted as an OIC member, granted that
it did not satisfy the rule of having one-quarter of its
population as Muslims, then Russia could enjoy the same
membership treatment.
Aside from Putin,
Philippine President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo will also
be present as an observer. Both are there because of
their governments' respective struggles with Muslim
insurgency movements in Chechnya and Mindanao.
Due to the OIC's dismal record, some have
severely criticized its inept performance, alluding to
the OIC as an irrelevant multilateral Islamic
organization whose deliberations, some insiders
confided, often include very colorful exchanges, with
one Arab minister calling another leader by expletives
and names.
Nor has the OIC taken a clear stance
against terrorism. When the attacks of September 11,
2001, occurred, it took the OIC two months to protest
the actions perpetrated by the radical Muslims. Nor has
the OIC, to the chagrin of many, opposed "suicide
attacks" yet, a military tactic clearly banned in Islam.
In its April 2002 meeting, again in Kuala
Lumpur, the OIC's 13-member ministerial committee did
not agree on the definition of "terrorism". Instead, the
committee sought to convene a UN conference to consider
the issue. But OIC delegates admitted privately that
they doubted the US and other permanent members of the
UN Security Council would support the idea of such a
conference.
This is because such a debate would
invariably be enlarged to criticize the iron-fist
tactics of Israel, an ally of the US, one of the
contributing causes of the suicidal attacks. In the
latest meeting in Putrajaya, suicide terrorism was once
again not on the agenda of the OIC.
(Copyright
2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please contact content@atimes.com for
information on our sales and syndication policies.)
Oct 16, 2003
No
material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written
permission.
Copyright
2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd,
Central, Hong Kong