Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Southeast Asia

A Hero on the road to Manila
By Marco Garrido

MANILA - With the Philippine presidential election less than two months away, the six candidates have come to sound only the single notes that distinguish them from one another. Should one meet such motley companions on the road to Manila, a la Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, they might introduce themselves as the types they have labored to portray throughout the election season.

Former police chief Ping Lacson would be the Constable. Former education secretary Raul Roco would be the Reformer. Brother Eddie Villanueva, pastor of the charismatic Jesus is Lord sect, would be - why, yes - the Preacher. Recently disqualified nuisance candidate Eddie Gil, running on a promise personally to pay off the government's massive foreign debt (while being unable to pay his own hotel bills), would be the Clown. As for front-runners incumbent president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and movie star Fernando Poe Jr, the former would be the Politician and the latter the Hero.

Such typecasting might be more accurate than one imagines. Take the issue of corruption. While a banner issue for all candidates, each candidate emphasizes a distinct approach. Roco advocates tackling corruption by reforming the bureaucracy. Lacson vows to prosecute grafters "without fear or favor". Brother Eddie calls for moral leadership. Arroyo refers to her record. And Poe, when he does proffer an opinion, is characteristically vague, full of "one-liners and motherhood statements", in the words of senate president Franklin Drilon.

The reticent candidate
Poe's reticence is fully in keeping with his popular image. Heroes are not expected to be voluble. More so a hero like FPJ, as he is known, whose celluloid personae are just as tight with words. Political analyst Joel Rocamora explains: "Demigods do not have platforms. They come from heaven with tablets of stone." Poe's is, of course, a necessary reserve. Not only do heroes become suspect if they talk too much - suspected, that is, of mere mortality - but in Poe's particular case, disaster seems to strike as often as he opens his mouth.

A sampling. When asked to comment on reports blaming the peso plunge on his lack of an economic platform, he responded, "That's new. That happens because we don't have an economic program? That's new." When asked what the government should do to stabilize the peso: "I really don't know. Do you?" Then more confidently: "Work, just work." When asked how he would spur economic growth: "Well, you see, about our growth rate, it will rise when our funding rises." And about how he would deal with Muslim insurgency: "We need to let them know that what they're doing is bad, especially the kidnapping of innocent civilians." That these excerpts have been translated from the Filipino indicate another misgiving about Poe: that he can't speak English fluently. He reportedly told a group of students in Zamboanga: "I will not fail you down!"

Poe is perhaps only outdimmed by Eddie Gil. When asked what a normal day was like for him, Gil replied: "Saturday." When interviewed about his plan to replace the peso with the US dollar, he said: "Korea has the Korean dollar. China has the Chinese dollar." When the interviewer protested that Korea had the won and China the yuan, he replied: "Those are still dollars." Another time Gil refused to divulge his father's first name because it was "too sentimental" and he might forget what he was thinking. He did admit, however, that his father would appear to him in dreams with instructions - and that sometimes his father even wrote these instructions on the blackboard.

Nevertheless, even had he not been disqualified, a Gil presidency was about as likely as his ability to pay off the national debt. Because he couldn't win, he was laughed at and considered comic relief. Because Poe could very well win, his blunders are harder to laugh at.

Poe's handlers realize that his image must be carefully managed. Too much exposure can reveal him to be more than merely fallible, actually incompetent. Hence Poe's campaign persona has largely been kept to a reprise of his celluloid personae. Poe begged off joining in a presidential debate not because he was afraid of embarrassing himself but because debates are "a waste of time", and as a man of action, he had no time to waste on words. Of course, this strategy furthers suspicions that he is simply trying to hide his incompetence, but better suspicions than their confirmation.

Few opinions and fewer details
Even the release of Poe's platform last week - finally - does little to clear the murkiness of his campaign. The platform hardly dares venture beyond platitudes on trust and vaguely benevolent policy statements. It lacks the specificity of Arroyo's and Roco's platforms or the zeal of Brother Eddie's and Lacson's.

It is a platform that clearly puts Poe's persona at its center. "He is the message," said Poe's campaign manager, Senator Tito Sotto. "His platform is his character." The platform mainly reiterates the Poe campaign's chief claim: that he is the only one who can unite the nation and restore people's trust in government.

The platform is framed along six promises: that a Poe administration will (1)Restore people's trust in government, (2) Provide for people's basic needs, (3) Ensure that the government lives within its means, (4) Protect vulnerable sectors, (5) Provide equal opportunities for all, and (6) Balance conflicting interests.

The first item is more the premise on which the subsequent promises rest. For example, the platform identifies poverty as the Philippines' gravest ill - not surprisingly considering that the backbone of Poe's support comes from the poorest quarters - and posits the restoration of people's faith in government as the first step toward redressing poverty. Other steps that follow (the platform lists increased spending on social services, transparent investment regulations to attract foreign capital, and a nationwide employment program) are subordinate to this first step.

The platform reflects the campaign's assumption that trust is something only Poe can deliver. It goes on to presume that everything will follow from trust; that once Poe restores people's trust, he will be able to muster enough political will to implement whatever development agenda he pleases. The specifics matter less than the man. As Poe himself put it, "Without this [pointing to his heart - although, of course, he could just be indicating himself], the rest doesn't matter." Indeed, the rest of the platform cleaves to this kind of thinking. Its considerable vacuity can be excused by recalling that, after all, Poe is the message and his platform is his character. This is the mantra to exorcise all reasonable skepticism.
Following is Poe's position on six issues of particularly international consequence.

Globalization. Poe believes the Philippines should actively participate in international trade. He also believes that the Philippines should achieve food security. To do so, he advocates greater spending on infrastructure and research-and-development projects as well as reforming agricultural trade policies for fairness. This might prove to be an untenable position. The pro-poor groups behind Poe's candidacy want higher tariff barriers. All of Poe's economic advisers, however, have consistently advocated the dismantling of tariff barriers.

Foreign debt. A Poe administration "would look into the possibility of restructuring our sovereign debt in the domestic and international financial markets". These words, innocuous as they might seem, sent shivers down the financial market's spine. Not that debt restructuring is anything new - the Philippines has been doing it since the 1980s - but such a big word on Poe's lips made creditors wonder if he knew what he was talking about; if he didn't, perhaps, mean debt repudiation. That Poe's spokesman had to clarify that his boss did indeed use the word correctly says a lot about how the financial community sees Poe - and, of course, how they would react in the event of a Poe presidency.

Foreign policy. Poe promises to promote a more "visionary" foreign policy. He also says, perhaps by way of explaining what he means by "visionary", that the Philippines should "intensify" cooperation with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Japan, China, the European Union, and the United States. That's about as much explanation as he gives.

Insurgency. Poe advocates the formulation of a national peace policy in order to frame the government's negotiations with insurgent groups. He doesn't elaborate on the contents of said policy.

Terrorism. Poe advocates the formulation of a national security framework to deal with terrorism. Again, he doesn't elaborate. (One is left wondering about such groups as the New People's Army that are classified as both insurgent and terrorist. Under which framework would they fall?)

Charter change (to shift from a presidential to parliamentary form of government). Where the other candidates (including Gil) have taken a stand, Poe hedges. He will "conduct an in-depth review of the possibility".

A presidency of courtiers
Without question, FPJ the Hero can get elected simply on the basis of what he represents. But what happens once he becomes president? He cannot count on insurgents to be cowed by his tough-guy film roles. He cannot bank on his experience as the owner of a movie production company to inspire investor confidence. On the contrary, his lack of experience and his projected dullness will dissuade new investments. Investors will view him differently, as FPJ the Dunce.

A Poe administration would be a presidency run by courtiers - by politicians whose own images have become too laden, too tarnished, to excite the masses. "Let's say it like it is," says Rocamora. "An FPJ presidency will restore to power the people behind both [Ferdinand] Marcos and [Joseph] Estrada." The politicians behind the two most vile and corrupt administrations in Philippine history, the two that had to be removed by popular uprisings, may once again have the president's ear.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Mar 23, 2004





'Fairness' law stymies Philippine media
(Mar 17, '04)

Whither People Power? (Mar 2, '04)

The mad, mad world of Philippine politics (Janr 22, '04)

 

         
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong