Activist's death opens door to
impunity By David Fullbrook
BANGKOK - Unlike others who have gunned down
activists in Thailand over the last few years, the
killers of Charoen Wat-aksorn, the country's latest
victim, may not escape justice. Killing with impunity,
however, will likely remain a part of Thai society
alongside chilli and smiles until the government gets
serious about law enforcement and the public gets
serious about human rights.
Charoen, a humble,
popular 38-year-old man returned home to the breezy palm
trees and tranquil paddy fields of coastal Prachuap
Khiri Khan province on the night of June 22 after
telling senators in Bangkok how local officials were
colluding to transfer 53 rai (8.5 hectares) of public
land in Bo Nok to a local strongman. That night, for
investigating this attempted theft it is presumed,
assassins pulled triggers and Charoen fell dead.
Uproar followed, all the more surprising for a
public pre-occupied with cheering on European football
teams during Euro 2004. Such vigor says much about this
case. Charoen was fighting to save public land. Whereas
most protestors represent minority groups, all too often
branded troublemakers, protesting against government or
corporate development plans that will ruin their
environment or livelihood.
Prime Minister
Thaksin Shinawatra has since ordered police to apprehend
the killers without fear or favor, an unusual move for a
protestor's murder. Outrage demands action, but the
murder also hints that despite popular perception to the
contrary, Thaksin's power is not almighty. "This
seriously challenges the rule of law in Thailand. The
dynamics are very worrisome. It is nothing short of a
challenge to the government," says Dr Surachai Wangaew,
chairman of the Campaign for Popular Democracy.
Police, poorly paid, resourced and trained,
often find pay-offs and the whims of wealthy businessmen
or crime bosses hard to avoid. After all, fuel is not
free, school fees are not cheap, and everyone likes to
buy nice things occasionally. While corruption is never
justifiable, neither is expecting a difficult job to be
done well on the cheap. If people want clean, honest
police, then they must demand education and budget
reforms along with salaries required for a modern police
service.
Still, arrests in the Charoen murder do
seem likely given that regional, national and, rumor has
it, Justice Ministry investigators are on the case.
Heavy sentences will serve the government's reputation
well in what is essentially a private transaction
divorced from government policy.
There is little
succor for families and friends of the 15 protestors
killed since Thaksin entered the Government House in
January 2001, however. That their killers remain at
large is blamed on the apathy of the police, whose
battered reputation took another hit when five officers
were arrested in connection with the disappearance of
human rights lawyer Somchai Neelhaphaijit, missing since
March. So far they face theft charges only.
Figures for the number of activists killed
during the previous Chuan government's tenure are hard
to find, so it's difficult to determine if the death
toll has gone up. Observers, however, often point to
differences between Thaksin's and Chuan's governing
style. "The Democrats, when in power, did not encourage
extra-judicial killings, they did not have a war on
drugs," says Professor Giles Ungpakorn, a social
scientist at Chulalongkorn University researching social
movements.
More killings are feared. "I'm afraid
we are returning to an era like the 1970s, of killing of
people in conflict with the state, especially over
natural resources," says Senator Dr Nirun
Phitakwatchara, chairman of the Senate social
development and human security committee.
Police
brutally assaulted activists protesting against a
pipeline in southern Thailand in December 2002, drawing
the wrath of a respected police general serving in the
Senate. During 2003's war on drugs and in the ongoing
turmoil along the country's southern border provinces,
there have been thousands of killings and
disappearances. Gangsters, thugs and separatists are the
culprits, says the government. Many beg to differ. "It
is government policy to use violence against people,"
says Nirun.
Most cases remain unsolved,
gathering dust in manila files as police focus their
meager resources on areas of greater government and
public concern. Criticism locally and nationally, even
from the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights, has not
provoked a review. "I don't think there is the political
will. Extra-judicial killings are considered
acceptable," says Giles.
This government
disinterest encourages the settling of scores by bullets
rather than dialogue or through the courts. "It makes
people everywhere try to solve problems by violence,"
says Nirun.
Not that this is anything new.
Murder, in part because pay-offs often throw court
verdicts, has long been a feature of business life in
Thailand. But as Thailand develops and civil society
grows, awareness of rights and related killings rises,
leading to more protests and demands for justice. But it
seems there is still a long way to go.
"[Charoen's murder] happened because a culture
of impunity is still widespread in Thailand. Influential
people believe police will not enforce the law. The
mafia believe that they will not be brought to justice,"
says Somchai Homla-or, the Law Society of Thailand's
human rights committee chairman.
Thaksin's
government charged into power, promising to accelerate
development, spread wealth and eliminate poverty. Noble
aims that deserve applause. In some respects it is one
of the most proactive governments in Thailand's history.
"In many ways, Thaksin tackles the right issues such as
poverty, but he seems too often to choose the wrong
way," says Dr Sunai Pasuk, Senate foreign affairs
committee adviser.
Its economic focus, however,
leaves little room for the parallel development of civil
society and human rights, which are integral to
successful, stable, just democracies.
While
money may well have played a part in handing victory to
Thaksin's Thai Rak Thai party, voting played a crucial
role, reflecting people's concerns. Jobs, education and
health are more than enough for tens of millions of poor
Thais to grapple with.
There is little room for
fuzzier, harder to grasp concepts such as human rights
and minority rights, which do not figure largely into
daily life. "Human rights issues are not part of the
issues of concern to mainstream society. Hence it is not
a concern for the government," says Sunai.
Signs
exist that a just society in which the law is paramount
is emerging slowly. Thai civil society, not just groups
of people fighting to protect local resources from a
rapacious state, has blossomed over the last two
decades. Given another decade or two, education and
campaigning will change public minds and force
politicians to take such issues seriously.
(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All
rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for
information on our sales and syndication policies.)
Jun 26, 2004
No
material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written
permission.
Copyright
2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd,
Central, Hong Kong