WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Jan 10, 2007
Page 1 of 2
Another blot on Myanmar's rights record
By Clifford McCoy

MAE SOT, Thailand - Myanmar's army is using the threat of starvation to force thousands of civilians out of the country's eastern hills, where the government is pitched in a protracted battle against ethnic insurgent groups. As the ruling State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) continues its almost year-long offensive, new reports are surfacing of troops targeting the civilian population by destroying fields and rice stores and even shooting on sight villagers tending to their crops.

The controversial military strategy, characterized by the military as the "Four Cuts", targets civilians to undermine support for



ethnic insurgents by severing them from sources of intelligence, funds, recruits and even food. The broad strategy dates back to the 1960s and was largely instrumental in forcing insurgent groups out of the country's central regions and into border areas.

The current campaign is designed to force the civilians out of the hills of Pegu division and northern Karen state, thus eliminating the last large area of territory the insurgent Karen claim. Significantly, the area is also the site of two proposed large hydropower dams that the military regime plans to build along the Salween River and contains large untapped swaths of forests and mineral and gold deposits.

In the field, the Four Cuts strategy has been implemented through forced relocations, the burning of villages and random killing of civilians. Yet from a military perspective, the most effective component of the strategy has been targeting village food supplies, and the latest indications are that government troops are intensifying such operations. Although the right to food is not expressly guaranteed under international law, numerous international agreements, including the Geneva Conventions, contain provisions that civilian populations should have access to adequate food.

The growing attacks against civilian food supplies have recently been well documented in reports released by independent organizations such as the Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG), a grassroots advocacy group, and the Free Burma Rangers (FBR), a relief organization that brings medical and food supplies to displaced villagers inside Myanmar. Human Rights Watch, a US rights group, in late November expressed its "grave concern for the food security of the local population if the army attempts to disrupt the harvest in order to take over food stocks for its troops".

Human-rights reports from the area of the current offensive have largely been based on the testimonies of displaced villagers still living in hiding in the area or refugees who have arrived on the Myanmar-Thailand border. Relief workers and human-rights monitors working in the area have corroborated the villagers' stories with photographs of burning villages and rice stores, landmines and destroyed fields. The reporting has covered such a large area that the growing attacks on food supplies indicate a centralized military strategy rather than the work of renegade military units.

That strategy is currently being employed against the Karen in northern Karen state and eastern Pegu division, which according to a November press release by Human Rights Watch has resulted in the displacement of about 27,000 civilians. More than 5,000 of these displaced civilians have made their way to Thailand to join the estimated 145,000 refugees now seeking shelter in camps there. The number of refugees seeking shelter in Thailand has surged in recent years as the Myanmar military has intensified its attacks against civilians.

US criticism, UN scrutiny
Myanmar's military regime is under growing international pressure related to its poor human-rights record. The United States successfully lobbied to have Myanmar placed under the scrutiny of the United Nations Security Council and is seeking a Security Council resolution on Myanmar calling for it, among other things, to stop attacks on the civilian population. The US has significantly cited Myanmar's threat to regional security as its rationale for heightened UN attention to the deteriorating situation.

The continued arbitrary killing of civilians, burning of homes and destruction of food supplies as a part of the military's counterinsurgency strategy against the armed opposition will no doubt add more fuel to the diplomatic fire. The ruling junta has so far shown little regard for international opinion, continuing with its controversial offensive despite the risk of coming under UN sanctions and already threatened by the International Labor Organization with legal action at the International Court for its continued use of forced labor. The ruling SPDC is also under pressure for well-documented reports detailing the military's widespread use of rape in conflict areas and its alleged involvement in the narcotics trade - charges the regime strongly denies.

The reports also come at a time when China, India and other regional countries are increasingly engaging Myanmar's generals to secure new energy deals, some in contested ethnic territories. While these deals have helped to shore up the junta's coffers substantially and clearly provide financial incentive for brokering ceasefires with rebel groups, reports from Karen state and other ethnic areas show that they have not led to a concomitant change 

Continued 1 2 


The case for royalty in Myanmar (Jan 5, '07)

Debating carrots and sticks for Myanmar (Nov 14, '06)

Myanmar shakes Western noose (Nov 3, '06)

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110