WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Apr 28, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Rogues of the world unite
By Clifford McCoy

interested in the North Korean Hwasong SRBM, a Scud-type missile with a range of up to 500 kilometers and a 770-kilogram conventional warhead.

It is unlikely that China would provide such advanced missile technology to Myanmar, which would likely rile the US and regional countries. North Korea, however, is unconcerned about



piquing Washington and has already sold an estimated 300-350 ballistic missiles to foreign countries and readily makes parts and missile technology available on underground global markets.

The presence of ballistic missiles in Myanmar would likely elicit particularly strong reactions from Thailand and India. A recent report by Jane's Defence Weekly that Thailand recently launched a new missile- and rocket-production program would appear to be a defensive reaction to Myanmar's move to acquire North Korean missile technology.

Nuclear ambitions?
There has also been diplomatic speculation that North Korea is involved in the building of a nuclear test reactor in central Myanmar. The reactor was initially to be built with Russian assistance, but Moscow reportedly pulled out because of Myanmar's inability to pay for the construction. Moreover, it remains unclear why aircraft from North Korea's Air Koryu airline landed at military airfields in central Myanmar in 2003, or what North Korean technicians were doing at Myothit near Natmauk, upper Myanmar, around the same time.

Some diplomats are concerned that the SPDC may be interested in acquiring some sort of nuclear weapon, or at least obtaining enough nuclear material to make a so-called "dirty bomb". The SPDC claims it wants a nuclear reactor for peaceful medical research and maybe to generate power and strongly maintains that it has no interest in making a nuclear bomb.

Some believe that the junta sees the potential upside to North Korea's recent nuclear brinksmanship against the United States. Representatives of North Korea's Daesong Economic Group were in Myanmar in 2003 and the company has a record of secretly proliferating nuclear and missile technology, including to Pakistan. Opposition media sources based in Thailand have also reported that the SPDC has been sending officers to North Korea for nuclear-related training, including 80 officers in November 2003.

These reports may be jumping the gun, as all the officers were members of the air defense and artillery divisions of the army and could have been sent to gain expertise in new artillery or surface-to-air missiles. Moreover, there has been some speculation by diplomats and intelligence officials that Myanmar may be paying for the arms and technology transfers with drugs. This connection has not been substantiated with hard proof, but there is plenty of circumstantial evidence.

A February 16 US Congressional Research Service report, "North Korea Crime-for-Profit Activities", accused Pyongyang of involvement in heroin and methamphetamine smuggling and the production of counterfeit currency and cigarettes. North Korean heroin shipments have been interdicted in the past, but it remains unclear whether Pyongyang was the owner or merely the shipping agent of the narcotics.

There is at least some connection to Myanmar, though not necessarily to the SPDC. Heroin seized in Taiwan in 2002 and in Australia in 2003 was labeled with the Double-UO-Globe brand. This brand of opium is produced by the United Wa State Army, which operates in northern Myanmar. Although North Korea is believed to produce its own heroin and methamphetamines, it could be supplementing its own production with that from Myanmar.

A 2003 article in the Far Eastern Economic Review quoted US intelligence officials as saying North Korean agents had been seen in the Golden Triangle. While it is unlikely that the SPDC would directly hand drugs to North Korea, it has become clear in recent years that despite rhetoric to the contrary, the regime is involved in the production and trafficking of drugs within Myanmar and to neighboring countries. Army units have been accused of taxing the trade, providing protection to production laboratories, and allowing drug barons to invest money in legitimate businesses.

One advantage for North Korea in normalizing bilateral relations with Myanmar would be to establish a formal diplomatic channel to pressure the junta to crack down on North Korean refugees escaping across the Chinese border, traveling through Myanmar and across to Thailand, from where they are repatriated to South Korea. Growing refugee flows have become a point of embarrassment for Pyongyang and it undoubtedly would like to see the route through Myanmar severed. Myanmar security forces would also likely have knowledge of the movement of North Korean refugees through their contacts with ethnic insurgent ceasefire groups along the Chinese border and hence would be in a position to interdict the refugees if ordered to do so.

Yet there are also risks to normalizing ties. South Korea has become one of Myanmar's leading trade partners and a major investor, and establishing formal diplomatic relations with North Korea could risk antagonizing the budding commercial relationship. The decision will likely also be unpopular with the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, particularly with member countries Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia. Myanmar is a member of the grouping.

Myanmar's apparent desire to acquire power-projection capabilities makes Thailand in particular nervous, considering the two traditional adversaries share long stretches of contested border areas and Bangkok has quietly provided sanctuary and support to armed ethnic insurgent groups. Myanmar's army and Thai security forces have occasionally clashed in recent years.

Meanwhile, both Malaysia and Singapore would likely view any sort of North Korean military presence in the region as a destabilizing influence. Myanmar's attempts to acquire SRBMs, submarines and nuclear capability from Pyongyang could spark a new arms race, one that few regional governments could afford.

The SPDC may be hoping that the re-establishment of diplomatic relations with North Korea will give it an ally against Western pressure, especially from the US. It may turn out, however, that the opposite is true. Both regimes have well-documented histories of human-rights abuses, narcotics trafficking, money-laundering, human trafficking and forced labor, and establishing formal bilateral relations and strategic linkages will likely make the US and the European Union take greater notice of their interactions.

The US already views Myanmar as a rogue state and some US politicians called for adding Yangon to President George W Bush's "axis of evil" after the SPDC's violent attack in May 2003 on democratic opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi's motorcade. Until now, Myanmar has not been a strategic concern to the US, but a substantial improvement in Myanmar's military capabilities and closer ties with a proliferating North Korea could quickly change that calculus.

Clifford McCoy is a Chiang Mai-based journalist.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 Back

 

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110