WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Jun 21, 2007
Page 1 of 2
Capitalizing the Thai-Myanmar border
By Clifford McCoy

MAE SOT, Thailand - The conflict-ridden Thai-Myanmar border has long been associated with drug smuggling, arms-dealing and human trafficking and other illicit trades. Now a new investment initiative aims to bring bilateral border trade above ground through the establishment of export-oriented special economic zones (SEZs) in the two countries' hinterlands.

The two sides agreed last month in Mandalay to finalize a long pending agreement, which in the first phases will open the way for



Thai agribusinesses to cultivate millions of acres of land tax-free in Myanmar's border areas. The ambitious plan to turn battlefields into marketplaces has the tacit backing of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), but at the same time has come under heavy criticism from rights organizations.

The initiative is the outgrowth of the multilateral Economic Cooperation Strategy (ECS), which was first launched in 2003 by former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra with the aim of increasing trade investment between Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos, and has been continued by Thailand's new ruling military junta.

Plans to construct a formal border trade zone at the Myanmar town of Myawaddy, directly across from the Thai town of Mae Sot, as well as two industrial zones, one at Pa'an in Karen state and another at Moulmein in Mon state, have been in the planning stages for several years and are now reportedly on course to begin groundbreaking this year.

The Myawaddy zone, which will be the first built, will become Myanmar's second-largest border trade zone, lagging only the Muse 105 Mile Border Trade Zone in northern Shan state across from the southern China town of Ruili. Thailand is expected to finance nearly all of the project's construction through grants and loans to Myanmar's government, consistent with Thailand's aim to use the ECS as a vehicle to establish itself as a regional donor country.

A feasibility study, conducted by the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand and Myanmar's Ministry of Industry-1, was completed last July on the proposed Myawaddy, Pa'an and Moulmein SEZs. The study claimed that there were positive responses from potential Thai and Chinese investors, although there were still outstanding concerns holding back large-scale investments, particularly concerning the lack of basic infrastructure.

Both governments have a strategic interest in developing the border areas. One chief aim of establishing SEZs will be to create local jobs and hence curb the massive influx of illegal migrant workers into Thailand. Estimates of the number of migrant Myanmar workers in Thailand run as high as 2 million, some who possess proper working papers, but many not. Thai manufacturers have long tapped cheap Myanmar labor to beat down costs, but the Thai government has simultaneously deemed the large number of undocumented workers as a potential security and public health threat.

With large parts of the border area across from Thailand's western Tak province now under the control of the ruling State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) or their proxy Democratic Karen Buddhist Army (DKBA), contract farming ventures have recently sprouted in border areas ahead of the new agreement. The DKBA is a breakaway faction of the still insurgent Karen National Union and has struck a separate peace with the military regime.

Those ventures at first seemed to be local initiatives brokered privately between Thai agribusinesses and ethnic Burmese businessmen or DKBA military commanders, but have since been formalized by the Thai and Myanmar governments involving huge tracts of land.

A memorandum of understanding (MoU) first signed between the two governments in December 2005 and made operational last month will pave the way for Thai contract farmers to manage and cultivate more than 7 million hectares of land in Myanmar for sugarcane, oil palm, cassava, beans and rubber.

Also under the agreement, four areas of Karen and Mon states are designated for contract farming. The most northerly area consists of 20,000 hectares across the border from Tha Song Yang in Thailand. A second area of 40,000 hectares is in the area of Ko Ko and Rai villages just north of Myawaddy. A third area, also along the border, is an area of 40,000 hectares around Waley village across from the Thai district of Pho Pra. Further west is the fourth area in a 200,000-hectare triangle formed by the towns of Kawkareik, Kya In and Kyaikdoe. The contract farms in these areas are all overseen by the state-run Thai National Economic and Social Development Board.

In addition to the current MoU, Thai officials were quoted in the Thai media as saying after the ECS meeting in May they were working to finalize yet another bilateral agreement on contract farming in other undisclosed border areas. Curiously, negotiations for another agreement come as some Thai investors under the original deal are already protesting about the original scheme's implementation and taxation.

Thai investors who invested in farms to grow maize, mung and castor beans on 6,475 hectares of Myanmar land across from Mae Sot, Mae Ramat and the Pho Pra district of Tak province were allowed under the original MoU agreement to export their products to Thailand duty-free. However, the Thai investors allege that tariffs have been levied by Myanmar officials and some have threatened to pull out of the project altogether if the taxes are not repealed.

Forcible evictions
More controversially, land targeted for Thai contract farms is often already under cultivation by small-scale subsistence farmers, many from ethnic minority groups that have long occupied the areas. A recent report by the Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG) detailed the methods the SPDC has used in the past to forcibly evict villagers from their land to clear the way for large-scale commercial farms.

KHRG and other rights groups claim that land is frequently confiscated, access roads are built with the use of forced labor and the farm projects are often subsidized with money extorted from local villagers. Villagers are often forced to work on the farms and plantations for minimal or no pay, the rights groups allege. Specifically, ethnic Shan farmers near Muse along the Chinese border have protested an increase in land seizures in 2006, including a 15,000-hectare area for a contract rubber plantation.

The soon-to-be-built SEZs and the contract farms are connected by a third even more controversial project: the Asia Highway. The highway is a part of a road system first envisioned by the United Nations Economics and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific in 1959 that once completed will crisscross all of Asia. The section of the highway that runs through Myanmar's Karen and Mon states is known as Asia Highway 1 and cuts across the 

Continued 1 2 


China paves way to Myanmar riches (Nov 1, '06)

Trans-Asian Highway gains traction (Apr 22, '06)



1. Gaza: Death of the two-state solution.

2. A clean sweep

3. Iran: Blowback, detainee-style

4. I told you so, essentially 

5.US losing ground through tribal allies

6. After Rumsfeld, a new dawn?

7. Levitate the Pentagon

8. US gives Russia short shrift 

9.Thailand's free-falling economy

10. Lessons from China's
slavery scandal


(24 hours to 11.59pm ET, June 19, 2007)

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110