WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Aug 4, 2011


New capital ambitions in Indonesia
By Jacob Zenn

JAKARTA - Fast economic growth and rural-to-urban migration are straining Indonesia's congested capital, reviving official talk that the country's administrative center would be better placed in a peripheral location. President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has voiced his support for such a move, giving the periodically revisited idea fresh impetus while the country surges ahead economically.

Coastal Jakarta is more populated than ever, with more than 13 million people. That's up from a population of 10 million in 1998 and less than one million before the country gained independence from colonial rule in 1945. Tortuous traffic jams, creaky infrastructure and ever rising levels of pollution in Jakarta are restraining significantly the country's trade and investment potential.

New motor vehicle registrations are up recently around 10% per

 
year while urban planners are paving new roads at a lagging 1%-2% per annum. Poor public transport systems, meanwhile, are forcing the country's fast growing middle class to purchase automobiles more out of necessity rather than prestige. Bottlenecks in Jakarta cost the country as much as 5.7 trillion rupiah (US$670 million) per year in wasted fuel costs alone. Pollution-related public health bills push that cost higher.

According to Indonesia 2033 Vision Team, a group of experts from the University of Indonesia researching different scenarios for moving the capital, locations on Kalimantan island have the best prospects. The expert group contends that a Kalimantan-situated capital would allow for more sustainable economic development, create a strategic epicenter for the archipelago nation and help to stop the overwhelming migration from underdeveloped regions to Jakarta.

The working group estimates a move to Kalimantan that was commenced relatively soon and completed over a five-year period would cost the country around 50 trillion rupiah. Such a move would entail building up basic infrastructure, including electricity, ports and government offices, as well as constructing homes for an estimated 400,000 civil servants, according to the group's projection.

If instead the move's time-line was extended over a 10-year horizon the cost would rise to around 100 trillion rupiah, a sum the expert group considers financially feasible considering that the annual national budget is currently allocated at around 1 quadrillion rupiah. The group's experts predict the move would simultaneously boost revenues and the national economy through increased travel to the new city.

Yudhoyono, twice popularly elected, has by some analyst estimates enough political capital at his disposal to push through such a high cost move. He has outlined his vision for Indonesia to become a ''BRIC'' economy by 2020, a plan many foreign analysts view as achievable. A new capital, the analysts say, would showcase nicely the country's higher economic status and cement Yudhoyono's legacy as an economic reformer.

Designs to move the capital, a legacy of short-sighted urban planning during Dutch colonial rule, were first mooted as far back as the 1950s. Then president and independence hero Sukarno proposed the capital be moved to Palangkaraya, now the capital of Central Kalimantan province. Sukarno's plan aimed to unite the country's diverse ethnic groups, lessen the country's economic dependence on Java island and concentrate political power at the country's natural geographic center.

His unifying ambition stalled due to a lack of resources and the burdens of building for the Asian Games and Games of New Emerging Forces, a short-lived counter to the Olympic Games for socialist states, which were both held in Jakarta in 1962.

President Suharto later revived the idea in the 1990s when he proposed to move the capital to Jonggol, an area 50 kilometers south of Jakarta. His ambition was upended by the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis, which depleted the national coffers and sent the economy into a downward tailspin, and the subsequent reformasi protests that drove him from power after 32 years of strongman rule.

With the national finances now largely restored, Sukarno's and Suharto's proposed cities, Palangkaraya and Jonggol, are still candidates for the move. So are two cities in Kalimantan, namely the westerly Pontianak, which is strategically located near shipping and financial hub Singapore, and the southerly Banjarmasin, which is well-served by maritime traffic in the Java Sea.

Policymakers are reportedly looking towards other country examples for guidance. Uprooting the capital from Jakarta to Kalimantan would follow in Brazil's radical footsteps when it moved government offices in Rio de Janeiro to the newly created Brasilia in 1960. The move allowed Brazil to populate and develop a previously impoverished region and design a city from scratch to achieve fluid traffic flows.

Relocating the capital to nearby Jonggol, on the other hand, would be more akin to Malaysia's first phase move from Kuala Lumpur to Putrajaya in 1999. The Malaysian government aimed to build an ''intelligent city'' where 40% of the land is reserved for greenery. A high-speed rail connects downtown Kuala Lumpur to Putrajaya, which is less crowded and more eco-friendly than the old capital.

From a construction and cost standpoint, massive improvements to Jakarta's failing infrastructure would be the easiest but potentially least effective option. Current plans won't be enough to bridge the gap: a monorail system scheduled to open in Jakarta in 2016 will only serve the city center and consist of a mere one-kilometer of track. Designated express lanes for buses and other high-occupancy vehicles have been impossible to enforce and had little impact on the city's legendary traffic jams.

Suharto's vision of a capital at Jonggol appears to balance the need for a new city with the practical and financial limitations of relocating the entire government to a distant new location. However, Jonggol land has recently been swallowed up by speculators, causing prices to skyrocket and raising new questions about the plan's economic viability. Powerful parliamentary factions are known to have divergent interests in which geography is chosen, meaning there is a political chance a new Indonesian capital is built for the wrong and potentially corrupt reasons.

Jacob Zenn graduated from Georgetown Law in 2011 and is currently based in East Java, Indonesia.

(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


Indonesia's uncertain dance
(Oct 6, '10)

In a haze, Indonesia slows deforestation (Sep 26, '09)


1.
The collapse of America's middle class

2. Military hawks upset with US debt deal

3. Taiwan lowers its military sights

4. New-generation war in Myanmar

5. All aboard North Korea's refugee railroad

6. China's sea dragon and humankind undersea

7. US grows a tree of tension with Iran

8. Syria's body count rises

9. China's state-run NGOs in graft spotlight

10. Debt posturing

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Aug 2, 2011)

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110