Asia Time Online - Daily News
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese

    Southeast Asia
     Oct 20, 2011

Happy to be Chinese in Indonesia
By Muhammad Cohen

BALI - A leading expert on Indonesia's Chinese minority says their situation has improved dramatically since deadly riots in 1998, thanks to a reformasi wave that followed. But as outright anti-Chinese prejudice fades, author Jemma Purdey warns bias could find a home in Indonesia's Islamist movement.

A post-doctoral fellow at Melbourne's Monash University, Purdey wrote Anti-Chinese Violence in Indonesia, 1996-99, widely acknowledged as a key work on the 1998 attacks that targeted ethnic Chinese in Jakarta, Medan, Solo and other major Indonesian cities and contributed to the fall of then President Suharto's 32-year authoritarian regime.

"Anti-Chinese violence flares up from time to time. It's become

normalized [among Indonesian-Chinese] and is easy enough to deal with. It's a tradeoff for being here and enjoying prosperity," Purdey told Asia Times Online at Bali's Ubud Writers and Readers Festival earlier this month.

Less than 3% of Indonesia's 245 million-strong population, ethnic Chinese control a disproportionate amount of the nation's wealth. A 1995 survey found ethnic Chinese controlled 73% of the publicly listed companies on the Jakarta Stock Exchange and 68% of the top 300 conglomerates, leading to a mistaken belief that Chinese ran 70% of Indonesia's economy. Their economic influence endures today.

Since colonial times, Chinese have occupied a niche as traders, using family, international and local political connections to prosper. After independence in 1947, President Sukarno tried to limit their influence with preferential treatment for non-Chinese Indonesians. The aftermath of an abortive 1965 coup attempt on Sukarno featured massacres of alleged communists, including tens of thousands of Chinese. General Suharto crushed the alleged coup plotters before being installed as president of the so-called New Order in March 1967.

Authoritarian schizophrenia
The New Order regime took a schizophrenic approach toward the minority. On one hand, it banned displays of Chinese language and fostered suspicion of Chinese as potential communists. On the other, Suharto granted selected Chinese tycoons monopolies and other favorable business deals, believing that it was safer to give Chinese economic power because they couldn't challenge him politically and could be convenient targets for resentment.

Less cynically, Suharto likely believed that the Chinese minority held the superior business sense and connections to drive economic development. Sudono Salim's Salim group grew its flour milling concession into the world's largest producer of instant noodles, a position Indofood still occupies. It's also a major player in palm oil, logging and property development.

Sinar Mas Group, founded by Eka Tjipta Widjaja, controls Asia Pulp and Paper and major palm oil producer PT Smart. Both rank among the largest producers in the region and both are widely accused of rainforest destruction in Indonesia and beyond. Wal-Mart has recently faced boycott threats over stocking Sinar Mas Group's Paseo brand of paper products.

"Suharto's rule was good for a few families considered to be part of the ethnic group [labeled] Chinese-Indonesians, but generally the system was based on discrimination against ethnic Chinese," Christian Chua, author of Chinese Big Business in Indonesia that chronicles the tycoons' adaptation and continued success in the post-Suharto era , says: "Of course, it will take one or two generations to overcome ethnic prejudices, but the progress is tangible."

"It's not just race, class or religion that feeds anti-Chinese sentiments, it's a combination of all three," Purdey contends. "At the grassroots level, there was a normal level of tension, and violence under certain conditions." Attacks tended to be against property rather than people, which made them relatively more tolerable, she said.

Purdey's book begins in 1996, as Suharto began to lose his political touch after three decades of authoritarian rule. Anti-Chinese acts increased in number, especially after the regional economic crisis hit in the second half of 1997, but the nature of the attacks was unchanged. Then the Suharto regime made Indonesian-Chinese scapegoats for rising food prices.

Shattered pattern
"The riots in 1998 were not part of the normal pattern of violence against Chinese," Purdey recalls. "The systematic nature and scale of the violence were different. There were reports of military involvement. Chinese women were raped, which was not normal." Investigators found similar patterns of rape in East Timor and Aceh, where the Indonesian military fought against separatist movements with virtually no accountability.

"More needed to be asked of [former generals] Prabowo [Subianto] and Wiranto" about their involvement with those riots, according to Purdey. Many suspect that the military staged the riots as a pretext for either a coup against Suharto or a crackdown against dissidents to preserve the New Order. Prabowo, Suharto's former son-in-law and the army's special forces commander, became the "fall guy" for the riots but has "remade" himself as a presidential candidate for 2014 elections, Purdey notes. Prabowo and Wiranto both ran as losing vice-presidential candidates in 2009.

"Even though he mainly aimed at the farmer vote, he reached out to Chinese to say he had no responsibility for the riots," Purdey says, recalling his recent presidential campaign. "As a member of a rich family, he tries to assure Chinese that he understands their concerns," she adds with a measure of incredulity.

In the wake of the 1998 destruction that left more than 1,000 dead and an estimated US$300 million in property damage, some Chinese left Indonesia and many were traumatized. An estimated US$20 billion in capital fled overseas, much of it to Singapore, rich Indonesians' favored destination.

Government officials in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong called on Indonesia to protect ethnic Chinese, sentiments tempered by awareness that embracing Indonesia's Chinese too tightly could further stigmatize them as more Chinese than Indonesian and provoke further difficulties.

As horrific as the May riots were, the impact wasn't as great as the massacres of 1965-66, Purdey believes. "In 1998, there was a measure of solidarity between Chinese and other victims of the New Order," she says. Although the attacks were characterized as anti-Chinese, Purdey notes that more non-Chinese died, mainly looters trapped in burning shopping centers. Non-Chinese were also targeted for rape.

Hope and progress
The wave of reform that followed the fall of Suharto has turned the years since 1998 into "a time of real hope and progress" for Chinese, Purdey says. President Abdurrahman Wahid, popularly known as Gus Dur, scrapped anti-Chinese laws, including the ban on Chinese language instruction and Chinese signs. Chinese New Year, known locally as Imlek, became a national holiday under Wahid's watch.

"Many ethnic Chinese took advantage of the new democratic space to establish political parties, non-governmental organizations and action groups to fight for the abolition of discriminatory laws, defend their rights and promote solidarity among ethnic groups in Indonesia," Singapore Management University Assistant Professor of Asian Studies Chang-Yau Hoon says.

"They utilized the reformasi atmosphere to promote pluralism and multiculturalism, and to liberate their long-suppressed identity and cultural heritage." Chinese political parties proved a non-starter due to the group's small numbers, but political and civic involvement reversed the predominant patterns under Suharto.

"Some people claimed that with the end of Suharto and the election of Gus Dur, the Chinese could treat [the 1998 riots] as an anomaly," says Purdey, who was in Ubud discussing her latest book, From Vienna to Yogyakarta (UNSW Press, 2011), a biography of Australia's pioneering Indonesian scholar Herb Feith. "Incidents of anti-Chinese occurred after 1998, during one of the most violent periods of Indonesian history. But the violence had returned to the normal scale."

Ironically, for Indonesian Chinese immigrants hoping for asylum in Australia, that's not good news. "In truth, they don't have a well-founded fear of persecution," the standard for granting asylum, Purdey asserts.

Keeping score
As Indonesia's economy has recently boomed, ethnic Chinese have again been big winners. "They're overwhelmingly middle class or above, so they are benefiting disproportionately," Purdey says. "If there is an economic crisis, that could be the next test," she adds.

"Resentment was mostly due to monopoly" and preferential treat of Chinese tycoons, says Aristides Katoppo, chairman of the Sinar Harapan newspaper that was shut down by Suharto and returned after 15 years in 2001. "The benefits now are sufficiently shared" to make a violent reaction less likely.

"I have argued in my book, Chinese Identity in Post-Suharto Indonesia [2008, Sussex Academic Press], that the May 1998 violence was a turning point for the ethnic Chinese in Indonesia," Hoon says. "For the first time in several decades, Chinese culture became visible."

"Younger Chinese now celebrate their Chinese-ness," Purdey notes. "A lot of Chinese Indonesians are studying in China, either language or university degrees." In Indonesia's Chinese communities, traditions such as the lion dance have enjoyed revivals. Across ethnicities, pop culture products from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan enjoy rising popularity.

"However, the increase in consumption of Chinese cultural products by local communities should not be naively read as an acceptance of the ethnic Chinese, just as one can enjoy the food at McDonald's but still disapprove of the United States," Hoon says.

"There is always a risk that the ceremonial celebration of Chinese culture in Indonesia may lead to an uncritical assumption by the Indonesian public that a process of re-sinicization is underway," Hoon, born in Malaysia, raised in Brunei and educated in Australia, continues. "The influence of the New Order assimilationist rhetoric on the public discourse of identity is still very strong. This assimilationist ideology conceptualized and expounded identity as an either-or proposition: that is, the more Chinese a person is, the less Indonesian a person becomes, and vice versa."

Purdey believes that as outright anti-Chinese discrimination becomes less acceptable, it may find a home in the broader movement against pluralism that's rooted in Islamic extremism. She also sees the growing controversy over building churches, and to some extent even attacks on them, as having anti-Chinese overtones.

"The general way politics is going involves pandering to extremists. Other religious groups talk about pluralism. That's where Chinese have to be; they have to be engaged in that conversation," Purdey says. "The ultimate that Chinese hope for is to be viewed like Bugis or Betawi, just another ethnic group in the 'unity in diversity' [Indonesia's national motto] ideal."

Purdey and other observers agree Indonesia's Chinese are much closer to that ideal now than they were in 1998.

Former broadcast news producer Muhammad Cohen told America's story to the world as a US diplomat and is author of Hong Kong On Air, a novel set during the 1997 handover about television news, love, betrayal, financial crisis, and cheap lingerie. Follow Muhammad Cohen's blog for more on the media and Asia, his adopted home.

(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Religious powder keg sizzles in Indonesia
(Oct 4, '11)

Church bomb shows Indonesian extremism
(Sep 27, '11)

Little Yueyue and China's moral road

2. China behind Myanmar's course shift

3. US officials peddle false intel

4. Occupy World Street

5. Raging US pulls no punches on Iran

6. Hawks behind Iraq War rally for Iran strikes

7. The importance of destruction

8. Royal wedding stirs change in Bhutan

9. Obama, the king of Africa

10. RIM on edge in Indonesia

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Oct 18, 2011)

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110