SPEAKING FREELY Cambodia's unrealized promise By Ou Virak
Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have
their say.
Please click hereif you are interested in contributing.
PHNOM PENH - Twenty years ago this week Cambodia entered a brave new dawn. The
four Cambodian factions that had fought a protracted civil war since the fall
of the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979 came together with signatories from 18
countries in Paris to sign the Agreement on a Comprehensive Political
Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict, otherwise known as the Paris Peace
Agreement. It was a document that promised the Cambodian people peace,
stability, democracy and human rights after decades of war and hardship.
The RGC has made some laudable achievements since signing the Paris Peace Agreement. It presided over the ultimate
disintegration of the Khmer Rouge after more than three decades of war,
slaughter and widespread suffering; it established the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in
an attempt to provide justice to the victims of the genocidal regime; it signed
various international human-rights covenants and treaties; it oversaw
Cambodia's entry into the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN); and
it has achieved a fair degree of economic prosperity and development.
In the fields of democracy and human rights, however, its accomplishments are
less clear. Prime Minister Hun Sen's government has routinely flouted many of
the covenants it has ratified; further entrenched a pervasive culture of
corruption and impunity, allowed the wealth gap between the elite and vast
majority of poverty-ridden Cambodians to widen alarmingly, and waged a
sustained legislative and administrative campaign to control every aspect of
the Cambodian people's lives, showing scant regard for the rule of law,
democratic institutions and human rights and freedoms.
Freedom of expression in Cambodia has been steadily squeezed, with those
wanting to speak openly and protest peacefully increasingly stifled by
legislative and judicial means. Leveraging its strong parliamentary majority
won at the 2008 polls, the governing Cambodian People's Party (CPP) has passed
and continues to pass restrictive laws that play to its political advantage.
The courts, which are under total executive control, often act as
anti-democratic enforcer, implementing draconian measures under a legislative
veil of legitimacy.
For example, the Penal Code, which came into force in December 2010, maintains
the dissemination of "disinformation" and defamation as criminal offenses
punishable by prison terms. These codes have since been used to silence
human-rights activists and others who question or criticize the RGC's
personalities, policies and actions.
Limiting freedom of association has recently been given government priority.
The latest - and most controversial - law in this legislative campaign is the
pending Law on Associations and Non-Governmental Organizations (LANGO), which
is set to impose mandatory registration requirements on all non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and community-based organizations while allowing for
arbitrary administrative sanctions, including suspension and closure.
The forthcoming Law on Trade Unions, as currently drafted, also threatens to
deal a serious blow to the right of freedom of association in Cambodia,
imposing onerous registration processes and reporting obligations on groups of
employees.
Under both laws, groups must register their activities and the very act of
forming associations without official approval will be deemed illegal. Recent
events, including the suspension of an NGO involved in monitoring a government
compensation program and the official harassment and intimidation of other
watchdog and advocacy NGOs, suggest that such laws are part of a wider effort
to erode democratic space and silence civil society.
Without a viable political opposition, Cambodia now functions as a veritable
one-party state. Sam Rainsy, the eponymous leader of the opposition Sam Rainsy
Party, is in exile fleeing a raft of politically-motivated criminal charges.
Kem Sokha, head of the Human Rights Party, has also come under legal threat. It
is not inconceivable that the next general election in 2013 could be contested
without the leaders of the two main opposition parties.
Hun Sen outlined his intention "to make the opposition group die" in a speech
earlier this year and later pledged to arrest a government critic whose
comments about the Arab Spring were perceived as an attempt to foment a similar
popular uprising in Cambodia.
Rather than limiting the space for opposition voices, the RGC should ensure
that the government's ongoing development is shared by all, with social
development prioritized as much as economic development. An increasingly
educated and technology savvy new generation can play its part, as young people
take advantage of opportunities that their elders were deprived of by the grim
demands of the Khmer Rouge's brutal regime.
A rising professional class envisions Cambodia as a high-tech, educated,
prosperous country playing a leading role in ASEAN. Under the current regime and restrictions, it's a democratic
vision that risks going unrealized.
There is much that the international community can do. While the RGC contends
that the implementation and protection of democracy and human rights is a
sovereign issue not subject to international interference, the 18 other
signatories of the Paris Peace Agreement - as well as the United Nations (UN) -
are legally bound to protect and promote democracy and human rights in
Cambodia.
These parties can use their economic and political leverage to ensure that the
long-suffering Cambodian people can at long last enjoy the democracy and human
rights that were promised to them two decades ago.
All stakeholders in Cambodia's future - the RGC, the signatories to the Paris
Peace Agreement, the UN, the donors and the people of Cambodia - should use
this anniversary as an opportunity to ensure that their substantial commitment
and investment is not squandered.
Ou Virak is president of the Phnom Penh-based Cambodian Center for Human
Rights.
(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please
contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)
Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to
have their say.Please click hereif you are interested in contributing. Articles
submitted for this section allow our readers to express their opinions and do
not necessarily meet the same editorial standards of Asia Times Online's
regular contributors.
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road,
Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
