WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Nov 17, 2011


Airlines face East-West fight
By Michael Mackey

SEOUL - When Air Asia launched the region's first low-cost airline in 2001, the Malaysian carrier's no-frills, efficiency-driven model irreversibly shifted the industry's economics and competitive airscape. The distinction between full service and low-cost carriers has since been blurred as traditional Asian carriers take on more budget characteristics.

New rounds of Asian innovation and convergence promise to transform the global aviation industry, but rising protectionism in the West threatens to reverse the rising trend, according to aviation experts and executives convened here at a recent meeting of the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines (AAPA), a regional trade body.

It is significant, they say, that the world's largest plane, the Airbus A380, was recently first flown commercially by Singapore Airlines

 
while Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner's maiden voyage was piloted by Japan's Nippon Airways. These potential industry-changing planes, both produced in the West, conspicuously scheduled their high-profile launches and landings for the world's most modern airports and thriving travel industries in the East.

While Western airlines struggle with slowing passenger growth, outdated travel facilities and new financial turbulence, many Asian airlines are accelerating and now carry a quarter of global passenger traffic and 40% of global freight. AAPA figures show Asian carriers excluding China flew a total of 16 million international passengers in September, up 5.4% over the same month last year. Economic malaise in the US and Europe meant demand for international air freight decreased 6.5% compared with September 2010.

Joint ventures, particularly between traditional and budget carriers, have given many Asian airlines an innovative lift and more focused global outlook, say industry sources. Recent tie-ups include Japan's JAL and Australia's Jetstar, Malaysia's Air Asia and Japan's ANA, and a series of joint ventures launched by Singapore's Tiger Airways, including in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. (A proposed Tiger Airways joint venture with South Korea's Incheon Metropolitan City never got of the ground.)

"Joint ventures are being formed between traditional carriers and new entrants seeking to combine their respective strengths to tap new markets internationally," said Andrew Herdman, AAPA's director general. "As always, the key to success will be efficient execution, regardless of the chosen business model."

Partially in response to national rules and restrictions on ownership, partially in imitation of Air Asia's original upstart model, traditional Asian carriers are launching new brands to tap new and expand emerging markets, including low-cost, long-haul flights to the US and Europe. East to West flights have traditionally been dominated by full-service Western carriers.

Singapore Airlines, frequently ranked as the world's best premium airline, in April launched a new long-haul budget carrier known as Scoot. In apparent competitive response, Thai Airways announced it would launch Thai Smile, an international budget carrier scheduled for take off in July 2012 that aims to fill a perceived market gap between low-cost and full-service airlines.

Despite the growth, innovation and new linkages, industry executives say they are bracing for market turbulence rising from the West. Leading the list of concerns are growing signs of a possible double-dip recession in the US and Europe, markets many Asian carriers are banking on for future growth and expansion, and potential government responses to contain the fallout.

The industry outlook "depends on the European recovery and North America," said EVA air's deputy senior vice president, Liao Chi-wei. Shinichiro Ito, ANA's president and chief executive officer, acknowledged at the AAPA meeting a recent significant decline in revenue derived from US and Europe destined cargo transport.

Green with envy
US and European protectionism, including certain measures seemingly designed to repel Asian carriers in particular, is the bigger risk. A growing number of cash-strapped Western governments are slapping higher taxes and surcharges on air travel, many creatively disguised as "green" initiatives.

Examples include Germany's and Austria's new "ecological" travel taxes and the United Kingdom's ever-rising Air Passenger Duty (APD), which since 2009 has made flights to and from Asia significantly more expensive in the name of environmental protection. These new taxes come on top of the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme, which likewise has in recent years made air travel to and from Europe more expensive.

So, too, has the recent growth of quasi-visa "travel authorization" fees in the debt-ridden US. As a national of a visa waiver country, including many in Asia, it now costs US$14 to apply for "authorization" to travel to the US before landing in the country.

One of the more telling moments at the AAPA meeting came when a PowerPoint presentation underlined the ways the US and individual European Union governments support their domestic airlines against foreign competition.

A number of Asian governments have threatened retaliatory measures, raising the prospect of an East versus West aviation trade war. The region's airlines, meanwhile, are seeking a level of influence more commensurate with their growing economic and market clout through the AAPA. The trade association has been particularly outspoken in calling for the EU to recognize that it has over-reached its authority by imposing the new taxes.

"As airlines, we certainly do not want to see a trade war, which would only inflict long-lasting damage to the competitiveness of the industry," AAPA said in a recent statement. At the same time, some in the association are clearly preparing for a fight. "It's time to stand up to Washington, its time to stand up to Bruxelles," said AAPA's technical director, Martin Eran-Tasker.

"Taxing the very people who you want to attract as visitors to your country is neither an effective welcome message [nor] a good way to develop the tourism industry," added AAPA's Herdman. "Rather than focus on adding layer upon layer of new regulations or additional taxes, governments would do well to reflect on the fact that aviation is a key contributor to economic recovery and job creation, led by travel and tourism," he said.

Brian Simpson, chair of the European Parliament's Transport Committee, acknowledged at the recent AAPA meeting in Seoul that some of Europe's new air travel taxes were "revenue streams, not environmental measures" and recognized that the measures were "a dangerous game". He said "the EU and the rest of the world are on a collision course that could precipitate a crisis."

Michael Mackey is a Bangkok-based freelance journalist.

(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


Haneda fails to solve Japan air travel woes
(Oct 29, '10)

India's air carriers spin loss riddle
(Aug 8, '09)

 

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110