MAE SOT - Recent reforms and
decisions promoted by Myanmar President Thein Sein
have been greeted with enthusiasm by much of the
international community. Yet, many crucial
issues remain unresolved, not least among them
ongoing conflicts and tenuous ceasefire agreements
between the Myanmar government and ethnic
paramilitary groups fighting for autonomy in their
territories.
Those armed conflicts have
sent tens of thousands of people, many of whom are
unregistered and considered stateless people in
Myanmar and neighboring Thailand, into refugee
camps along the Thai-Myanmar border.
Now, as Thein Sein's
nominally civilian government gestures towards
national reconciliation and attempts to forge
ceasefire agreements with armed groups, the future
of these refugees hangs in the balance.
Given the new possibility to work directly
with the Myanmar
government, many
international humanitarian agencies and
non-governmental organizations are weighing
whether to leave the Thai border and establish
projects and presences directly inside Myanmar,
one of Asia's most impoverished and underdeveloped
countries.
The Thai government, meanwhile, has
created new obstacles to international
organizations that have long operated along the
border in an apparent strategy to eventually push
the refugees back to Myanmar.
With no
binding political agreement between ethnic groups
and Myanmar's government in sight, and a renewed
conflict raging in northern Kachin state, the
premature departure of international aid, medical
and other humanitarian organizations from the
still volatile border regions will likely worsen
the living conditions of tens of thousands of
Thailand-based refugees, aggravating what is
already a grave humanitarian crisis.
According to the United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR),
Thailand currently hosts some 92,000 registered
refugees from Myanmar and an estimated 54,000
unregistered asylum seekers in nine camps along
the Thai-Myanmar border. Added to these figures
are at least 62,015 internally displaced persons
and 797,338 stateless people inside Myanmar.
Even with
a program started in 2005 to resettle refugees in
third countries, the population of Thailand's
refugee camps has not diminished.
Although
the first refugees started to arrive in the 1980s,
their future and legal status remains bleak and
uncertain. Thailand is party to neither the UN's
1951 Refugee Convention or its Statelessness
Conventions, thus limiting the UN's role on the
Thai border and in the camps. Amendments to
Thailand's Civil Registration Act in 2008 provided
for universal birth registration, allowing for the
issuance of birth certificates to all children
born in the country regardless of their parents'
status.
However, the "camps are dependent on large-scale funding by international donors," according to
a European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO)
report. [1]
UNHCR is currently one of few
international organizations that can confirm a
continued commitment to assistance programs along
the border. But that commitment, too, is flagging.
The Thai government has contributed a mere
US$20,000 per year since 2004 to UNHCR's
Thailand-related budget while private donors
contributed $3.3 million in 2011. UNHCR has
indicated without explanation on its website that
contributions to Thailand-based operations will be
less than last year, though officials deny the
fall in funding will impact its operations.
"We have no intention of decreasing our
services to the refugees who still need protection
on the Thai side of the border," said Kitty
McKinsey, UNHCR's spokesperson for Asia. "If and
when the time comes that they feel they can go
home in safety and dignity, we would of course
help them to do so."
The European Union,
too, has recently cut its humanitarian assistance
in Thailand, which includes aid for refugee camps
and funding for local civil society groups
involved with border and refugee issues. According
to ECHO's website, funds to "Myanmar/Thailand"
will decrease from 22.3 million euros (US$29.6
million) in 2011, with 8 million euros allocated
to refugees from Myanmar living in border camps in
Thailand, to 19 million euros in 2012, with just
6.4 million euros allocated to refugees.
Meanwhile, more foreign funds are being
funneled directly into Myanmar. In a report
published at the beginning of the year, Refugees
International wrote that: "In recent years, the
UK, EU, and Australia have significantly increased
assistance inside [Myanmar]. However, the majority
of the US government's $38.5 million contribution
to [Myanmar] goes to organizations based in
Thailand."
The report noted that "the
USAID's Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance
(OFDA) has spent only $100,000 in [Myanmar] since
its response to Cyclone Nargis," referring to the
2008 natural disaster that adversely affected over
two million Myanmar citizens. But as reported in
the State Department and USAID Congressional
Budget Justification, "the [fiscal year] 2012
request for [Myanmar] is $35.1m" including
"recovery programs to [Myanmar] refugees and
internally displaced persons along the border."
It's unclear how much of that allocation is
earmarked specifically for activities inside
Myanmar.
USAID engagement with Myanmar is
expected to increase with recent diplomatic
overtures, and as a result diminish in border
areas and refugee camps that Myanmar's military
considers sanctuaries for armed rebels. USAID
mission director Michael Yates told civil society
groups in Mae Sot on January 27 that his agency
had just signed a new program, including a
microfinance project, to work in central Myanmar.
"It's clear that you are here not doing
this for money... but because you are deeply and
passionately committed to working together across
ethnic minorities," said Yates, in words that
sounded like a farewell speech to many of the
groups in attendance at the meeting.
USAID's Bangkok office declined to answer
Asia Times Online's questions regarding its
continued financial support and commitment to Mae
Sot-based organizations, including ones like the
Mae Tao Clinic and the Medical Burmese Association
that provide crucial health assistance to refugee
camps and conflict-ridden areas inside Myanmar.
Engagement with Myanmar's nominally
civilian new government has become a matter of
priority for many Western governments and their
attached aid agencies. With the new political
opening, many seem keen to shift their focus and
resources away from the border and towards
establishing operations inside the country. The
United Kingdom's main aid agency, UKAID, currently
among Myanmar's biggest donors, declined to
respond to ATol e-mails requesting information
about its future financial support and commitment
along the Thai-Myanmar border.
ECHO has
shown a comparatively more transparent policy,
supported by reports, documents and public
relations materials outlining its activities.
"ECHO is in Burma/Myanmar since 2005 and we have
increased our budget also because we've see an
increase in our ability to implement the
projects," said ECHO's Mathias Eick. "There is a
general change of focus but this does not mean we
are forgetting about the refugees."
Apart from government aid
agencies, whose commitments depend on decisions
coming from higher levels of government,
non-governmental organizations are also shifting
their priorities. Others are being pushed to
abandon their commitments. Last December, Doctors
Without Borders (DWB) withdrew from Thailand after
35 years of providing training health programs and
emergency assistance in border areas.
The medical group left after "months and
months of negotiations with the Thai government
after failing to get permission to provide health
care to the undocumented [Myanmar] migrants and
vulnerable populations in Thailand," according to
a DWB press statement.
Border observers
say the departure of organizations like DWB and
declining levels of private donations threatens to
worsen an already dire situation for refugees in
Thailand. Over the last 20 years, various groups
have reached a growing number of refugees in need
of healthcare both in the camps and inside
Myanmar. While many groups and organizations are
well-trained and technically self-sustaining, they
still need outside financial and logistical
support to remain viable.
During the
January 27 USAID meeting in Mae Sot, several
medical, health and humanitarian groups were asked
by the USAID representative how they planned to
improve their capacity and programs in the next
three years. "Without the insurance of funds and
donations we cannot make plans for the future
three years," was the unanimous response among the
organizations in attendance.
Future funding and budget
plans are not only in short supply for health and
medical providers along the border. Other programs
that have provided education to refugees in the
camps are now also at risk. "The funding of
general education in the medium to long-term
future is of particular concern at present," wrote
ZOA Refugee Care Thailand in a 2011 report that
assessed the state of education in the camps.
The Dutch organization
which is now phasing out its operations in
Thailand underlined that "the combination of low
funding, limited resources and Thai government
restrictions has an impact on the quality of
education provided in the camps".
After more than 20 years of
assistance, there are still many problems in
Thailand's camps. The Thai government has thrown
up new obstacles to providing aid to refugees,
while donors' continue to lack coordination on the
ground.
Now, already
cash-strapped aid organizations will be pressed
through funding shortfalls to devise new
strategies to remain effective. Meanwhile,
organizations like USAID, UKAID and others are
rewarding Myanmar's new government - whose earlier
and current incarnation created the humanitarian
crisis on the border - with more aid and
assistance.
Roberto Tofani is a
freelance journalist and analyst covering
Southeast Asia. He is also the co-founder of
PlanetNext (www.planetnext.net), an association of
journalists committed to the concept of
"information for change".
Notes:
1. See Refugees in Thailand: Another 25 years in limbo?, the European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department (ECHO), June 20, 2010.
(Copyright 2012 Asia Times
Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please
contact us about sales, syndication and
republishing.)
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road,
Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110