WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Jul 27, 2012




Page 1 of 2
SPEAKING FREELY
Sinking feeling in the South China Sea
By Nazery Khalid

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

The unprecedented failure of the 45th Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Ministerial Meeting in Phnom Penh in June to issue a joint communique that captured the decisions of the meeting was as disappointing as it was predictable.

Prior to this, ASEAN, whose current motto is "One Community, One Destiny", had never failed to issue a collective statement at the conclusion of their annual summit in its 45-year history. At the

 

meeting, the current ASEAN chair, Cambodia, thwarted Philippines' push to include a statement on the territorial disputes in the South China Sea on grounds that it did not want to add to the rising political temperature on the matter.

The absence of the joint communique was nothing short of a monumental disappointment and presents a potentially morale-sapping loss of face on the bloc's part to its powerful regional northern neighbor, China in dealing in the issue. The failure of ASEAN to agree and endorse a common position on this divisive matter is effectively an act of ignoring the elephant in the room and a glaring display of disunity among its member nations.

Seen in the context of ASEAN acting as the protector of regional unity and a shield against external powers' influence, one could be forgiven for thinking that ASEAN centrality is cracking under pressure from the sheer weight of the issue.

Four ASEAN nations, namely Brunei, Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam, claim parts of the South China Sea, which are also claimed by Taiwan. China claims the entire sea based on what it says are its historical rights. Prior to the meeting, ASEAN could not agree on facing China as a bloc in discussing disputes in the sea. There was reluctance from member nations that have no claims in the sea and did not want to risk upsetting China over the matter.

Following the diplomatic impasse in Phnom Penh, it would take a major effort for ASEAN to pick itself up and muster the will to negotiate collectively with China in addressing disputes in the sea. By succeeding in preventing ASEAN from coming up with a united position on the issue, China would not be wrong to see the Phnom Penh meeting as a triumphant outcome of its strategy of not wanting to engage the issue on a multilateral basis, inadvertently splitting ASEAN in the process.

Feeling cornered
The upshot of the ASEAN meeting has been described in unfavorable terms by several analysts. Phrases such as "step in the wrong direction" and "act of obstinacy" have been used to describe Cambodia's failure to take charge of the meeting and to preserve ASEAN unity. China was accused of causing a rift among ASEAN members and of capitalizing on ASEAN divisions on the disputes in the sea. ASEAN was seen as disjointed and lacking in autonomy in its handling of the matter.

To blame the situation on Cambodia, China and ASEAN alone for the outcome of the meeting would not do justice to the complex interplay of actors and factors related to the issue. The influence of external powers weighed heavily over the matter. The failure of ASEAN to come up with a common position on the issue is as much a perhaps unintended end-result of the "pivot to Asia" policy of the US, a key external protagonist in the region, as it is a result of Cambodia's and China's conduct and ASEAN's split opinion on the subject.

The US has half-heartedly, and at times awkwardly, tried to disassociate its "rebalancing in Asia" strategy with China's rising influence in the region. In doing so, it has only succeeded in fueling China's perception that the policy is a calculated construct to contain its growing power and clout. Feeling cornered, China has come out assertively to defend what it sees as its "undisputable sovereign right" over the entire South China Sea. This chain of actions and reactions has significantly contributed to the convoluted situation in the sea today.

How has the US factor influenced the current state of play in the sea? It has been suggested by several analysts that the pluck shown by Vietnam and Philippines in standing up to China in the sea was a by-product of US involvement in the matter. Emboldened by Washington's pronouncements that it has a "national interest" in the sea and what they interpret as US siding with them in their disputes with China, Hanoi and Manila have reacted more assertively towards Beijing compared to other claimant states.

Other developments such as the deployment of US Marines in Darwin, Australia; the US proposal to deploy Littoral Combat Ships in the region using Singapore as its base; the resumption of military ties between US and Indonesia; and the launch of US-led Trans Pacific Partnership economic pact that excludes China were also interpreted by China as part of a grand American design to contain Beijing's growing might and ambition in the region.

Despite its professed commitment to work with ASEAN towards coming up guidelines to implement the Declaration of Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, China has never shown itself to be comfortable with the idea of elevating the political document to a legally binding Code of Conduct that would govern their conducts in the sea, prevent conflicts and manage disputes among them. China sees signing up to such a code as potentially curtailing its strategic options in the vast, resources-rich sea.

China has kept itself busy looking for signs of Washington attempting to build a soft alliance in the region to contain Beijing. It perceived the visit by US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to Cam Ranh Bay in Vietnam in June 2012 and the strongly worded description by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her visit to Phnom Penh just before the ASEAN meeting that China's conduct in the sea could end up becoming a "recipe for confrontation" as evidences of this intention.

Gaps in ASEAN defenses
The signs were already on the wall that Cambodia, a close ally of China, would break ranks from its ASEAN fellowship and not risk defying Beijing.

An early indication of China exerting its powerful influence on Cambodia was when its Premier Wen Jiabao stressed during the 20th ASEAN Summit in Bali in November 2011 that disputes in the sea should only be discussed between the claimants and not at the ASEAN level, and warned against the involvement of "outside powers" on the matter. Subsequently, Chinese President Hu Jintao visited Cambodia in March 2012, a move seen by analysts as pressuring the ASEAN chair not to raise South China Sea disputes in the recent ASEAN Ministerial Meeting.

On account of the failure of the meeting to agree on a common position on the subject, fears that China would coerce Cambodia into dropping the disputes in the sea from the discussion were not misplaced.

This move was seen by many analysts as consistent with Beijing's insistence of not wanting to "'internationalize"' the disputes in the sea and preference of discussing the matter on a bilateral basis. This approach works to its advantage on several counts; first, it can exercise its might and muscle in direct discussions with claimant states; second, it prevents ASEAN from taking a common position on the disputes hence preventing the bloc from discussing the matter on a multilateral platform.

One outcome against China's interest arising from its approach is the involvement of external powers in the issue. This, China feels strongly about; it has directly told the US not to interfere on the matter, which Beijing sees as a regional dispute to be settled among the claimant states. Washington said its "national interest" in the sea covers ensuring freedom of navigation and seeing to it that disputes are settled peacefully and using international law as a basis, and it has offered to play a role in the process. This irked China which resisted US advances to mediate, denouncing it as an unwelcome "interference". 

Continued 1 2 


US, China threaten Southeast Asian peace (Jul 25, '12)

Indonesia saves ASEAN's face
(Jul 23, '12)


1.
Israel stirs on the eve of Middle East war

2. Holy war in Syria and the course of history

3. German intelligence: al-Qaeda all over Syria

4. Syrian blood etches a new line in the sand

5. The rise and fall of Turkey's Erdogan

6. Your security's a joke

7. Catholic dynamic shifts in China

8. From Taliban arms to alms

9. Law without order in Myanmar

10. Cash-strapped 'stans open up to tourists

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Jul 25, 2012)

asia dive site

Myanmar Forum
Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110