WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese




    Southeast Asia
     Sep 18, 2012


Aung San Suu Kyi on risky ground in US
By David I Steinberg

Aung San Suu Kyi, the avatar of democracy in the Western world, is visiting the United States this week. A distinguished member of Myanmar's legislature, she is making her third trip abroad this year after spending 16 out of 21 years under house arrest beginning in 1989.

Her triumphal visit to a number of countries in Europe, during which she at last personally received in Oslo the Nobel Peace Prize she had been awarded in 1991, was preceded by a short trip to Bangkok to an economic summit, which attracted so much attention that President Thein Sein of Myanmar cancelled his trip, apparently because of fears he would have been overshadowed by

 

her media limelight.

Thein Sein and Suu Kyi will, however, overlap in the US: Myanmar's reformist president is to address the UN General Assembly while she is to travel extensively for almost two weeks to over half a dozen cities and receive accolades, including a Congressional medal, from a number of institutions across the US.

Both visits are important at a time the US has moved to engage the country it had for decades isolated. Thein Sein has been the architect of widespread reforms beginning in 2011 that have resulted in the most progressive changes in Myanmar since a military coup of 1962.

His administration has been the most open and tolerant of dissent since that period. With a refreshing change from past autocrats, Thein Sein has overseen the release of hundreds of political prisoners and other moves that have prompted a partial lifting of some US sanctions on investment and banking, and the appointment of a US ambassador to Myanmar for the first time since 1990.

Suu Kyi has fought for liberalization and democracy since 1988, and her views, or what have been purported to be her views when she was not accessible to the outside world, have for decades effectively determined US policies toward Myanmar.

Her congressional support has been extensive, and it is significant that US President Barack Obama personally contacted Suu Kyi to gain her approval to ensure that Secretary of State Clinton's visit in early December 2011 created no negative internal political backlash. US policy toward Myanmar is remarkably but unobtrusively locked into the internal US political process.

Thein Sein has long called for the removal of US economic and financial sanctions. The implicit opprobrium not only stopped all new US investment, but also caused some non-US firms to avoid Myanmar. Suu Kyi has been, fairly or unfairly, regarded by the previous military junta and Thein Sein's administration as largely responsible for the continuation of sanctions introduced in 1997, 2003, and 2008. For years she indicated her support for Western sanctions, including those imposed by the European Union, as well as an informal ban - now removed - on tourist travel.

In contrast to former presidents Bill Clinton and George W Bush, who both advocated the ineffective policy of regime change, Obama's approaches toward Myanmar have probably been the most effective foreign policy in East Asia in his administration, and have been mentioned as such in his Democrat Party platform. The policy called for "pragmatic engagement" - dialogue at high levels and (in deference to congress) continuation of some sanctions.

In August this year, Obama signed legislation continuing the sanctions against all Myanmar imports for another year on the basis that the country was a specific threat to US security and national interests - similar to language used to justify sanctions against North Korea.

Before such imports were halted, garment sales to the US totaled some US$356 million from factories that largely employed tens of thousands of Myanmar women on the edge of poverty and destitution. As the purpose of US engagement with Myanmar is to assist both its democratization and growth, there is a blatant inconsistency with the ends espoused and means employed.

For years, the US has hoped Suu Kyi could pursue an important and productive liberalizing role in Myanmar society. If she is to rise beyond her present status as a minority member of the legislature to an executive position after the 2015 polls, it would require the support of the military to amend the constitution, which now effectively precludes her from holding presidential or vice presidential positions because of the foreign allegiance of her two sons.

Now, as a politician and no longer the almost mythical figure of democracy in her own country, Suu Kyi needs the support of the civilianized Myanmar administration, composed largely of former military officials, as much as it needs her moral authority. (Twenty five percent of Myanmar's parliamentary seats are reserved for still-active military officials)

Mutual trust, so long lacking, is essential for Myanmar's reform program. Thus Suu Kyi's international acclaim should not be allowed to eclipse Thein Sein's upcoming important US visit, for it could conceivably endanger future collaborative reconciliation and progress.

During the visits of both Thein Sein and Suu Kyi, the US should even-handedly help the process of reconciliation among all groups within Myanmar for the welfare of the people, who have borne so much suffering for such a long time. Myanmar is Asia's second-poorest country on a per capita basis, trailing only Afghanistan.

Suu Kyi may cut a more attractive media profile, but until the next general election in 2015, the continuation and expansion of reforms depend largely on Thein Sein's will and determination. He should be received as such during his upcoming trip to the US.

David I Steinberg is Distinguished Professor of Asian Studies, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. His latest volume (with Fan Hongwei) is Modern China-Myanmar Relations: Dilemmas of Mutual Dependence (2012).

(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


Capacity dilemma in Myanmar (Sep 5, '12)

Trust deficit in Myanmar's 'transition' (Jul 17, '12)


1.
Putin opens Benghazi door for Obama

2. Mr Blowback rising in Benghazi

3. Brother Obama, where art thou?

4. Philippines on frontline of US-China rivalry

5. India scores in space

6. A tale of two (China vs US) stimuli

7. Perfect storm over Libya

8. Japan and China on a conflicting course

9. General ducks Afghan scandal evidence

10. Cambodia helps squeeze WikiLeaks

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Sep 14-16, 2012)

asia dive site

Myanmar Forum
Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110