Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Southeast Asia

Round two in Thailand's war on evil
By David Fullbrook

BANGKOK - Despite strong local and foreign criticism of Thailand's corpse-strewn war on drugs last year, which led to the deaths of more than 2,000 suspected traffickers and dealers, the government continues to laud the policy, this month renewing its so-called war on drugs and launching a new campaign dubbed the "war on dark influences".

Although the earlier deaths are blamed on state agents by many, the Thai government denies any official involvement in the killings, instead dismissing them as gangland hits. Even then, more than 1,000 unresolved murder cases still litter detectives' desks. Thus, it is telling that the subsequent war on dark influences and the second war on drugs have not been accompanied by gunfire and body counts.

Perhaps this is why little has been heard of the new wars, particularly the war on dark influences - shorthand for organized crime. In regard to the second war on drugs, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra said the new 90-day crackdown would target relapsed drug addicts, small-scale peddlers in Bangkok and other major cities and wholesale traffickers operating along Thailand's border with Myanmar.

Meanwhile, the war on dark influences had its opening salvo back in December, the same month that Shinawatra declared victory after a 10-month anti-drug campaign. Since that time, however, shootouts and rising body counts have not been leaping from the headlines as they were during the first drug crackdown.

"In the war on dark influence we did not find a significant number of extra-judicial killings. I think this is because of concern about foreign opinion," said Somchai Homlaor, chairman of the Law Society of Thailand's human rights committee, who added that even a year after the first drug war began people are still filing cases against the war on drugs.

But hitting dark influences, which the government describes as a web of cliques bringing together various politicians, businessmen and civil servants, could cause skeletons to tumble out of closets, especially if they are hit too hard. Feeling that the police were getting greedy, massage-parlor tycoon Chuwit Kamolvisit last year revealed the names of police officers he had previously bribed. Amid much political huffing and puffing, the accused police were soon transferred, while Chuwit turned politician, launched his own political party and is now running for governor of Bangkok. After an episode like this, nobody wants a more explosive rerun.

Thus, is seems Thailand is just not ready to take on crime's chief executive officers the way Singapore cut down on Chinese secret societies or Hong Kong rooted out corruption. "With the war on dark influences, while it has the objective of raising popularity, it soon became apparent to the government that this was not possible due to the extensive patronage system in Thai politics and business," said Sunai Pasuk, a professor who currently is researching Thai politics and human rights at Thammasat University.

Indeed, the government's strength may also be its shackles. "What's new about this government is that it has very clear policies in many dimensions. But it is contradictory too. It emphasizes new policies, but is full of old-style politicians based on old patronage systems linked to organized crime," said Dr Giles Ungpakorn, a political scientist at Chulalongkorn University.

These links may be putting a hold on the county's judicial system as well. Since December the war on drug-related homicides have been under investigation after a request from the revered King Bhumibol. Yet few, if any, charges have been brought despite most murder cases being solved relatively quickly in peaceful countries such as Thailand.

And it's making people wonder. "How seriously are the investigations being pursued?" asked Sunai. With plenty of evidence, such half-hearted investigations reinforce suspicions that some officials are covering up.

"I myself have investigated many cases in which the police seem to be connected in one way or another," said Somchai.

In time, the cases will likely be reopened by right-minded advocates, or politicians seeking to score popularity points by tackling the injustices of previous administrations. "There are people who are prepared to ask questions. In the long run that is where hope lies," said Ungpakorn.

But according to Senator Kraisak Choonhaven, who served as a prominent government adviser during the 1980s, "Many people, including senators like myself, believe these investigations will be a whitewash."

Kraisak's concerns may not be far from the truth. Bruised by the commotion along the Malaysian border, the bird-flu fiasco and postponement of the sale of some shares in the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand after electricity workers hinted that the lights might go off, the last thing the government needs is questions over the drug-war deaths returning to the headlines, even in the now-tamed media.

The first war on drugs epitomized the government's approach to many issues: pick a simple target, strike hard and fast while crowing about it, and then move swiftly on, keeping the initiative, setting the agenda and appealing to simple rural folk - the one's who by far wield the largest number of voting ballots.

That strategy now lies in tatters, torn by a string of thorny problems this year. "The conflict in the south and bird flu are a wake-up call that the standard policy used in the 'wars' does not work anymore," said a Western diplomat based in Bangkok.

Policymakers appear to have reached a similar conclusion. Although Thaksin still gives critics short shrift, while staunchly standing by the government's tough stance, government strategies have been quietly altered.

Drugs are now back on the agenda, but without the sharp rise in homicides that accompanied the first. If things continue this way it could improve the government's outlook in the eyes of those at home and abroad, many of whom used the drug crackdown to criticize Thailand's human rights record.

"The government is under a lot of political pressure - it is looking indecisive. Attacking drug dealers is a way to restore its position," said Sunai.

But if bullet-riddled bodies start turning up in this second war, it will put the government back under the human rights spotlight. Shrugging its shoulders while blithely pointing the finger at drug syndicates a second time may draw sharp, sanction-laden rebuke from Europe and the United States.

Therefore, time-worn political strategies are back in vogue. Money is being sent down south to pacify the troubled provinces. Sensible proposals to keep the bourse in check - which caused local investors to shy away, contributing to the recent bear run - have been scrapped. Thaksin has just redealt the cabinet pack, charging new hands and some old faces while getting the good news flowing to burnish the government's dented image.

Unfortunately, a well-respected Muslim human rights lawyer, Somchai Neelahphaijit, who is defending southern terrorism suspects, disappeared mysteriously a week ago. His family, Muslims and human rights activists fear the worst. Thaksin, however, sees no reason to worry.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Mar 24, 2004



Thai war on drugs: Hollow victory (Dec 17, '03)

The costs of Thailand's drug war 'victory' (May 7, '03)

Thailand's bloody battle to eradicate drugs (Mar 6, '03)

 

         
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong