ATol Specials


 
 

4
Kabul Diary
    by Pepe Escobar
    Nov-Dec 2001
 
4Iran Diary
    by Pepe Escobar
    May-June 2002

4
Iraq Diary
    
by Pepe Escobar
    March-April 2002
 


By July-August 2001, it was clear that something dramatic was about to happen. Pepe Escobar, our "Roving Eye", was
traveling in Afghanistan and the tribal areas of Pakistan. The rumor was that US forces were about to use Pakistan to launch a raid into Afghanistan. Escobar's article, published by Asia Times Online on August 30, 2001, was headlined  Get Osama! Now! Or else ... Our Karachi correspondent, Syed Saleem Shazad, was meanwhile filing articles like Osama bin Laden: The thorn in Pakistan's flesh (August 22) ...


October 10-September 10, 2002


The price of Russian support
By cutting business deals with Iran, Iraq, North Korea and other such states on the US blacklist, Russia is signaling to the West that its post-September 11 policy of backing Washington is neither irreversible nor free of charge. (Oct 10, '02)

China's Iraq stance pleases US - for now
Wielding veto power on the United Nations Security Council and traditionally an opponent of US "hegemonism", China has so far demonstrated surprising flexibility on the issue of military action against Iraq. But China's reliance on Iraqi oil and its long-standing distrust of the United States could yet tip the scales. (Oct 9, '02)

COMMENTARY
Smoke on the water
In the stew of conspiracy that is the Internet these days, the explosion of a French supertanker off the coast of Yemen has been attributed to any of a number of terrorist groups - assuming that it was even a terror attack. At which point perception and reality become frustratingly confusing. - Paul Belden (Oct 9, '02)

Tanker blast: Experts cry 'Osama!' ...
The blast that tore a hole in the French supertanker Limburg - an explosion in which some experts discern the handwriting of Osama bin Laden - happened to share a news cycle with an audiotape purporting to be of the man himself calling on "the youth of Islam [to] target key sectors of your economy". Coincidence? Or not. (Oct 8, '02)

... as the Jackal's eyes gleam
As the French counter-intelligence agency DST begins its investigation into the Limburg explosion, suspicions are rising that the French themselves (who also lost nine submarine experts in a Karachi hotel bombing in May) may have become targets of the remnant of a network led by one Ilich Ramirez Sanchez - aka Carlos the Jackal - who now sits in a cell - in France - perhaps smiling. - B Raman (Oct 8, '02)

US report blasts religious intolerance
The State Department has accused several Asian states, in particular those with totalitarian governments or predominantly Muslim populations, of denying religious freedom to their citizens and discriminating against religious minorities. A US Muslim group has advised America to have a look in the mirror. (Oct 8, '02)

Indonesia: Defending Islam against itself
The pro-Suharto radical FPI group claims to be fighting for Islam, but the great majority of Indonesians and mainstream Muslim organizations see it for what it is: a gang of thugs and vandals who terrorize the public and drive away business and tourists. Finally, after two years of mayhem, come signs the "Defenders of Islam" will be brought to account. - Bill Guerin
(Oct 8, '02)

US-India ties: An adept adaptation
The US's embrace of Pakistan as its key South Asian "ally" in the war on terror rankles in India (which thought itself much better cast in the role). Still, New Delhi has lost no time in extracting what advantage it can - to wit, Finance Minister Jaswant Singh's recent adroit appropriation of the language of "preemption" for India's own war on Islamabad-sanctioned terror. - Ramtanu Maitra (Oct 7, '02)

Terror stalks India's Silicon City
World-renowned as India's information technology capital, Bangalore is emerging as a haven for terrorists and underworld fugitives - with potentially disastrous consequences. - Sudha Ramachandran (Oct 4, '02)

Iraq: Use of force is unavoidable
With the US Congress's authorization forthcoming in the next few days, President George W Bush has a free hand, and all the justification he needs, to launch military action against the regime of Saddam Hussein - unilaterally if needs be. - Marc Erikson (Oct 4, '02)

   The House resolution: Full text
   Congress falls into line

COMMENTARY
The militarization of American foreign policy
If a majority of a state's citizens can be empowered to determine its policies, as in any democracy, perhaps a majority of the world's states should be empowered to determine global policies. The US, however, has made its overriding objective the creation of a system in which its will goes unchallenged. - Ahmad Faruqui (Oct 3, '02)

COMMENTARY
Like lambs to the slaughter of Iraq
While the multilateralist Europeans and Asians for the most part sit quietly by, American unilateralists and superhawks push on with their agenda of regime change. The most worrying question, though, is whether or not they will be content to stop with Iraq. - Ehsan Ahrari (Oct 2, '02)

Preemption meets the map of Asia
Preemption, the cornerstone of the Bush administration's new National Security Strategy, will require the ability to project force in the form of air power. But that ability is severely limited throughout much of Asia, where distances are great and modern airfields few. - David Isenberg (Oct 2, '02)

OIL AND WAR
Part 2: Crude assumptions
If the US plays its cards right, it could be on its way to a strategic grand slam, with Americans running the show in Iraq, and Americans running the show in Saudi Arabia. That would be a strong hand - except for the many jokers in the pack, headed by Russia. - Dinkar Ayilavarapu (Oct 1, '02)

Economic woes threaten Saudi stability
Saudi Arabia is crippled with 33% unemployment and a faltering economy. Such factors heighten the likelihood of serious social instability, already a threat if the country becomes engaged in any US war on Iraq. - Hooman Peimani (Oct 1, '02)

COMMENTARY
India: Time to dispense with illusions
In the context of the United States' burgeoning relations with Central Asian nations, Washington is going to depend on Islamabad and the Pakistani army - and not on India, despite what New Delhi might believe to the contrary. - Ramtanu Maitra (Oct 1, '02)

Human rights crackdowns overstated
After the September 11 terror attacks, human rights organizations feared that the US-led war on terrorism would lead widespread suppression of dissidents. This has not been the case, as human rights crackdowns in Asia under the guise of counter-terrorism have been overstated. - Alan Boyd (Oct 1, '02)


OIL AND WAR
Part 1: OPEC in the line of fire
The US's thinly-disguised strategy to get Iraq's oil into friendly hands, and in the process deal a crippling blow to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, has many pitfalls, including strengthening the hands of non-OPEC members. - Dinkar Ayilavarapu (Sep 30, '02)

   OPEC prices break through ceiling


Iraq: Speed is of the essence
If past US occupations of the Philippines, Korea, Vietnam and, more recently, Afghanistan offer any useful lesson, it is that Washington likely has only one good option in a post-Saddam Iraq - get in and out as quickly as possible. - David Isenberg (Sep 30, '02)

SATIRE
The case for regime change
Faced with a defiant challenge from a rogue regime that subjects political opponents and ethnic minorities to arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, that violates the most basic civil rights of its citizens, and ignores the Geneva Conventions on the humane treatment of prisoners of war, the United Nations must face up to its responsibilities. - Ted Rall (Sep 30, '02)

After Saddam: Fledgling states, oceans of oil
When the US wins its war against Iraq, which has little to do with Iraq and a lot to do with Saudi Arabia and the oil reserves of the Persian Gulf, there will come the business of controlling the brave new world. One major key is to stem Arab resentment by settling the Palestinian question, but it will be more complicated than that. - Francesco Sisci (Sep 27, '02)

Bush shoots his Weapon of Mass Democracy
The latest rationale offered by the Bush administration for ousting Saddam Hussein - that it would result in a flourishing of democracy in Iraq - is hypocrisy in the extreme, given the contempt with which many in Washington hold Arab and Islamic societies. (Sep 27, '02)

THE ROVING EYE
A resolution of question
With Tony Blair failing to produce a smoking gun against Saddam Hussein, attention now turns to the US-proposed UN Security Council resolution against Iraq. Like Blair's report, it is likely to be ambiguous at best, leaving the US sufficient scope to exercise its own resolution and oust Saddam. - Pepe Escobar (Sep 26, '02)

Blair fetches the stick for Bush to beat Iraq
The British dossier on Iraqi arms is less an intelligence assessment than a political football. Offering little in the way of hard data, it instead seeks to shift the burden of proving the absence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq onto Saddam Hussein. Meanwhile, the manager of the Indian firm named as a supplier of banned rocket propellant to Iraq denies the allegations, insisting "we don't make chemicals". (Sep 25, '02)

Humble no more ...
George W Bush's newly-released National Security Strategy commits the United States to a strike-first-and-fast doctrine in a "battle for the future of the Muslim world". It is a far cry from Bush's pre-election statement that the US must have a "humble" foreign policy. (Sep 24, '02)

Deterrence be damned
By unequivocally consigning the doctrine of deterrence to the rubbish bin of history, the Bush administration is sending a clear message to the US's foes - and also likely strengthening, rather than weakening, their resolve. - Ehsan Ahrari (Sep 24, '02)

Iran and Kuwait close ranks
Kuwait and Iran deny that their stepped up diplomatic exchanges have anything to do with the possibility of a US strike on Iraq. Nonsense: the two countries are desperately trying to work out a strategy to deal with the fast-changing events in their region. - Hooman Peimani (Sep 24, '02)

Iraq may well have nukes
Ukraine has "lost" up to 200 nuclear warheads. It has also sold high-tech weapons to Iraq. Along with many well-documented cases of theft and smuggling of weapons-grade nuclear material, and the know-how of Iraqi scientists, this all adds up to the probability that Iraq has attained a rudimentary nuclear capability. - Marc Erikson (Sep 23, '02)

North Korea's nuclear capability
US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week that North Korea "has nuclear weapons". If Rumsfeld has evidence for this, he may be the only one. But he is by no means alone in recognizing that Pyongyang has the technology and the nuclear material required to build such weapons. - David Isenberg (Sep 23, '02)

COMMENT
US intelligence failure: Deja vu
The current Congressional investigation into the state of the US intelligence community in the pre- and post-September 11 environment will most likely expose glaring deficiencies. But if these problems are addressed as shoddily as previous intelligence lapses were, expect more bungling. - B Raman (Sep 23, '02)

United they must stand, and fight
The US needs a new "strategic quartet" if it is to win the war against terrorism, writes American analyst Michael P Noonan. The police officer in New York City, the Special Forces soldier in the Hindu Kush, the CIA agent and the American public are all in this one together. (Sep 23, '02)

Bangladesh: Breeding ground for terror
From its base in Bangladesh near the Myanmar border, the Myanmese separatist group Rohingya Solidarity Organization has by no means limited itself to local action. In recent years, its influence has been felt as far Pakistan, Afghanistan, Jammu and Kashmir and Malaysia. (Sep 20, '02)

Jurassic Park in Washington
The principled multilateralism that served the interests of the US - not to mention the free world - well during the Cold War is being chased out of town, not by neo-conservatives, nor even "conservative realists", but by those whom Nelson Mandela calls "dinosaurs". - Ehsan Ahrari (Sep 19, '02)

THE ROVING EYE
Brave new (Middle Eastern) world
Part 2: The Iranian equation
Iran, troubled though it is by deep political and religious divisions, has its own views on how best to benefit from US aggression in the region. But ultimately, its designs will play second fiddle to what is decided in Washington to be in the best interests of the US. - Pepe Escobar (Sep 19, '02)

Bush's backside UN-covered
Even as President George W Bush demanded that the United Nations "act" on Iraq, he knew that the UN can never act on its own. But that's exactly what Bush was playing for: UN cover to effect the "regime change" that is US - not UN - policy. Will he get it? The answer depends on China, France and Russia, whose hand has been strengthened by Saddam Hussein's latest invitation to weapons inspectors. - Alexander Casella
(Sep 18, '02)

A US-Russian pas de deux
George W Bush spoke, Saddam Hussein answered, and the eyes of the world are turned to the United Nations. Now begins a time of delicate maneuvering - largely between the US and Russia - to determine the shape and nature of the world body's next step.(Sep 18, '02)


THE ROVING EYE
Brave new (Middle Eastern) world
Part 1: The Saudi equation
What Venice was to the 15th century, what Amsterdam was to the 17th - Dubai is to the 21st: the world's definitive cultural and commercial crossroads between East and West. Here, in the capital of modern Arab cosmopolitanism, Pepe Escobar discusses Arabian politics, Islamic advice columnists, and the popular local perception of the US as being transfixed by a vision of Iraq as "a ripe fruit just waiting to be plucked". (Sep 18, '02)

War on Iraq: Costs and consequences
In the second of two articles on the forgotten lessons of the Vietnam War, Francesco Sisci examines the complexities of establishing a new balance in the Middle East after a US-Iraq war. If Washington has a postwar plan of action, it's not revealing it. (Sep 18, '02)

THE ROVING EYE
Enlightened warlordism
In a land where distrust runs rampant - of the Karzai government, of the American presence, of the bomb-throwing warlords vying for power - a patriot in Nangarhar province encourages his countrymen to "put up the guns, pick up the pens" and get on with the business of rebuilding the country. The West would do well to heed the call too. - Pepe Escobar (Sep 17, '02)

The war on terror's neglected battlefield
The United States has had laudable military successes in the past year, and is looking to carry its war into Iraq. But as it learned - or should have learned - from the Vietnam War, if the battle for hearts and minds is lost, military victory will be empty and fleeting. This is the first of two articles by Francesco Sisci. (Sep 17, '02) 

After the rhetoric, the reality
George W Bush's speech to the United Nations set out the case for disarming Iraq; now it falls to the great powers to see this done through collective action of the United Nations. The stakes are no less than war and peace, and not just in Iraq - watching closely from the sidelines are Georgia, Taiwan and other nations at risk of war. - Ehsan Ahrari (Sep 17, '02)

Dealing in double standards: Bush at the UN
George W Bush's UN speech highlights the double standards and opportunism in his administration's efforts to promote compliance with UN resolutions as the justification for military action against Iraq. (Sep 17, '02)

The economic costs of war with Iraq
"The preponderance of evidence suggests that if we start this war we will be endangering our [the US's] economic health." This is the conclusion of Miriam Pemberton, of Foreign Policy in Focus, testifying before the US Congress last week. 
(Sep 16, '02) 

Terrorism's financial tentacles hard to sever
The real frontline in the war on terror is the labyrinth of financial cells that prop up the operations of extremist groups. Cut off the tentacles, declared George W Bush, and the body will quickly wither away. But a year later, the body is still evidently well nourished - largely because of widespread money-laundering in Asia. - Alan Boyd (Sep 16, '02)

COMMENT
Smoking al-Qaeda out of Karachi
Pakistan has consistently denied that Arab members of al-Qaeda are sheltering in Karachi. Last week's shootout and capture of leading figures manifestly proves the Pakistanis wrong. Further, writes B Raman, a former head of the counter-terrorism arm of the Indian Research & Analysis Wing, the latest incident throws the spotlight on Karachi's underworld, where India has some scores to settle. (Sep 16, '02)

Terror in the hands of a teenager
This is the story of Abdullah, a Pakistani barely old enough to grow a beard, who crossed the border into Indian-administered Kashmir and helped massacre 28 people in July. Abdullah is just one of many who ply this cross-border trade in terror. (Sep 16, '02)

Russia runs out of patience with Georgia
As the US argues at the UN for war on Iraq, another invasion is brewing not far away. Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered his military to prepare to strike Georgia - with justification borrowed from George W Bush. (Sep 13, '02)

   US-Russia: Thawing ice but freezing rain

US and India: Back to square one
One year after enthusiastically embracing the US in its war on terror, India should have reaped some benefits from Washington, especially with regard to Kashmir. This has not happened, much to the chagrin of New Delhi, which is now seriously reconsidering its position. - Sultan Shahin (Sep 13, '02)

Hawks hit by a rhetorical ricochet
By suggesting that it may be time to "take the Saudi out of Arabia", pro-war neo-conservatives in the US may have been trying to throw a scare into Crown Prince Abdullah and his rival Prince Sultan - but the ones really spooked by the tough-guy rhetoric were names such as Kissinger, Brzezinski and George Bush Sr.  (Sep 12, '02)

Asian winners and losers after September 11
All of Asia has seized upon the opportunity of currying US favor in the war on terrorism. Some nations - or their rulers - have apparently improved their situations, and some have not. Overall, though, their opportunistic maneuverings have not necessarily benefited the world, the US, or even themselves. - Gary LaMoshi (Sep 12, '02)

THE ROVING EYE
The Panjshir Lion lives
The assassination a year ago of Ahmad Shah Masoud, mujahideen hero and the Northern Alliance's Lion of the Panjshir, at the hands of al-Qaeda suicide operatives was aimed at eliminating the final obstacle to complete Taliban control over Afghanistan. His death, though, and the events of September 11, led to precisely the opposite happening. - Pepe Escobar (Sep 11, '02)

THE ROVING EYE
EXCLUSIVE: The last battle
Part 2: Special Forces, ordinary people
With Pepe Escobar in hot pursuit, US soldiers scour the remote regions of eastern Kunar province in Afghanistan looking for ... well, they refuse to say just whom. It doesn't take much to work out, though, that the targets of the Americans are members of the formidable coalition now involved in a jihad to kick foreign troops out of the country. (Sep 11, '02) 


THE ROVING EYE
EXCLUSIVE: The last battle
Part 1: Exit Osama, enter Hekmatyar

Roving deep into Afghanistan, Pepe Escobar encounters first hand American Special Forces in their search for Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the catalyst for the new jihad against foreign troops. The hunt, though, as Escobar discovers in the first article of a two-part series, is not a straightforward one as it involves complex shifting ethnic alliances peppered with traces of al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. (Sep 10, '02)

The simmering threat of Indonesian radicalism
While much of the Islamic world chose to view the US-led war on terrorism as an attack on their religion, the world's largest Muslim country clung to its traditions of moderation and tolerance. But with America poised to make war on another Muslim country, and with a government in Jakarta that has failed to seize the high ground, the radicals may yet win over peace-loving Indonesians. - Bill Guerin (Sep 11, '02)

Under Russian eyes, Central Asia ponders Iraq
With US troops and aid pouring into formerly Soviet-bloc Central Asia, the region is carefully weighing its options regarding a possible US attack on Iraq. One big question on every leader's mind: Where does Moscow stand? - Sergei Blagov (Sep 11, '02)

Battle is joined: Chicken Hawks v Ostriches
The political debate in the US over war with Iraq is shaping up as a food fight between, on the one hand, Republicans with loud opinions on war but no actual experience of its brutal reality and, on the other, Democrats with nothing to say on that particular subject.

  
Charge on Baghdad, cry the Chicken Hawks
   Baghdad? What? whisper the ostriches

From the al-Qaeda puzzle, a picture emerges
Piece by piece, the puzzle of al-Qaeda is becoming a picture of an organization that had foreseen the possible destruction of its Taliban hosts and planned for a quiet shift of assets and personnel to other, more secure nests. Two key questions remain: "Where are those nests?" and "Are they hatching a nuclear egg?" - Syed Saleem Shahzad (Sep 10, '02)

EDITORIAL
Vulnerable forever?
Today, one year after disaster struck from the blue sky, the United States and the other enemies of terrorism face an urgent question: what to do about Iraq? Two things are already clear: heinous acts of terror must be pre-empted, and Saddam Hussein still has time to prove he's not part of the problem. (Sep 10, '02)

The decline of the American Century
The 20th century witnessed the rise of an empire, much like the empires of the Romans, the Byzantines, the caliphs, the Ottomans, and the British. At its zenith, it seemed invincible. Then a ragtag band of latter-day Assassins struck at the very heart of its economic, political and military might, exposing the weakness within. - K Gajendra Singh (Sep 10, '02)

COMMENTARY
Invading Iraq, no matter the cost
There is no doubt that the United States has both the will and the power to attack Iraq on its own. But whether this is the prudent, or even desirable, course of action is another issue entirely. - Ehsan Ahrari (Sep 10, '02)

Who will police the world's policeman?

Minds they are a-changing

Jan '02

Sep '02

The war on terrorism in Afghanistan
is going well.

89%

65%

Although President George W Bush's preference for unilateralism finds resonance among Americans, according to a new poll, this should not be read by Washington as an excuse to go it alone in solving the world's problems. - Ehsan Ahrari  (Sep 10, '02)

Sep 9-Jul 20, '02



  For earlier articles,
  please go to:

Sep 9-Jul 20, '02

Jul 19-Jun 21, '02

Jun 20-Apr 9, '02

Apr 9-Jan 2, '02

Dec 31-Jul 26, '01
   

 
Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.