|
By July-August 2001, it was clear that something dramatic was about to happen.
Pepe Escobar, our "Roving Eye", was
traveling in Afghanistan and the tribal areas of Pakistan. The rumor was that
US forces were about to use Pakistan to launch a raid into Afghanistan.
Escobar's article, published by Asia Times Online on August 30, 2001, was
headlined Get
Osama! Now! Or else ... Our Karachi correspondent, Syed Saleem Shazad,
was meanwhile filing articles like Osama
bin Laden: The thorn in Pakistan's flesh
(August 22, 2001) ...
January 2003
THE ROVING EYE Listening to Europe Europe truly holds
the key to peace - if only her leaders knew it.
If only they would stop playing power politics
on the issue of Iraq and start listening to
their people - 82 percent of residents in the 15
EU member countries oppose war without a UN
mandate - they would realize that they have but
one defensible position on Iraq: a common EU
policy against unilateral war. - Pepe Escobar (Jan 31, '03)
COMMENTARY Of intimidation and
Israel Despite the
common anti-war rhetoric, the argument that the
coming war in Iraq is "all about oil" is about
as weak as the argument that it's purely a war
of "liberation". So why, exactly, is the Bush
administration going to war? Two reasons come to
mind. - Jim Lobe (Jan 31, '03)
OPEC
in the crosshairs The Bush administration has
been accused of obsessing over Iraqi oil, but if
one examines the likely economic effect of Iraqi
regime change (and subsequent production
increases) on the world's other major
oil-producing economies, one begins to suspect
that the strategy is focused less on Iraqi
oil than on OPEC oil, and the power it
represents. - Ehsan Ahrari
(Jan 31,
'03) Looking under every Iraqi
rock The US says that
time is running out for Baghdad to cooperate
with UN arms inspectors. But many other
countries disagree, saying the
inspectors should have more time and
that there is no need to disarm Iraq by force.
The dispute arises from different
perceptions of the immediacy and size of the
threat of Iraq's suspected weapons programs. In
this series, experts assess the danger of
Baghdad's nuclear weapons and missiles, as well
as its biological and chemical
weapons. (Jan
31, '03)
Nuclear and missile
threats contained Biological and
chemical threats uncertain
Saddam exile plan gathers pace
An unpublicized visit to
Pakistan by a high-powered Saudi delegation,
with full US support, signifies that despite the
war rhetoric coming out of Washington, moves for
a peaceful solution to the Iraq crisis through
the exile of Saddam Hussein are continuing at
the highest level. - Syed Saleem Shahzad (Jan 30,
'03)
THE ROVING
EYE Clues
from ancient Babylon Will Saddam
die fighting, or will he slip peacefully into
exile? Babylonian history supplies both
precedents. In 1258, the Mongols destroyed
Baghdad and killed Caliph Al-Mustasim, who died
fighting. By contrast, Gilgamesh, the legendary
king of Uruk, abdicated and wandered the earth
in search of the secret of immortality. So how
will Saddam play it? As a martyr or as a
philosopher-king? - Pepe Escobar (Jan 30,
'03)
The power and the
price
War
and the military-industrial
complex After World War II, the
role of defense spending in the US shifted from
domestic economic stimulant to global
geopolitical weapon. But while Ronald Reagan
successfully used Star Wars to bankrupt the
USSR, the nature of armaments has fundamentally
changed with the arrival of biological and chemical
weapons. Terrorism can only be fought with the
removal of injustice, not by developing
anti-missile defense shields and smart bombs.
- Henry C K Liu (Jan 30,
'03)
The law of the
jungle Blanket denunciations of US preemptive
strategy fail to realize that the
strategy is not the cause of international
chaos, but rather the logical outcome
of the failure of international
multilateralism that for too long invoked peace
but invited war. - Stephen Blank (Jan 30,
'03) | OPINION Why
the US doesn't need the
UN As
President George W Bush made quite clear in his
State of the Union address on Tuesday, the US
considers the regime of Saddam Hussein in clear
breach of United Nations resolutions and
reserves the right to act on its own in defense
of its national security and interests. And the
UN certainly won't be needed in any post-war
developments; how about letting the Iraqis
govern themselves for a change? -
Marc Erikson
(Jan 29,
'03)
THE ROVING
EYE Why the US
needs the UN
Getting
into Iraq is the easy part. Getting out - well,
now, there's the trick. Unless one has no
compunction about leaving behind a bloodbath,
civil war, famine or environmental catastrophe,
getting out of Iraq will probably require the
good offices of the United Nations at some point
in the future. And that's why the US needs a
second UN resolution, badly. - Pepe
Escobar (Jan
28, '03)
Of slogans and soundbites In an
effort to persuade a skeptical world, the Bush
administration has released a report titled
"Apparatus of Lies: Saddam's Disinformation and
Propaganda, 1990-2003". But propaganda remains a
matter of the beholder's eye, as David
Isenberg argues in examining the document's
factual allegations and logical foundations.
Meanwhile Ehsan Ahrari finds the
document's most important argument in the
chapter "Exploiting Islam", and its most
important readership in the global Muslim
ummah. (Jan
28, '03)
True facts and
fallacies Persuading the Muslim mind
AMBASSADOR'S
JOURNAL Iraq and the war of
words During
the Gulf crisis of 1990-1991, K Gajendra
Singh was stationed as India's ambassador to
Amman, the Jordanian capital, where he witnessed
first-hand the manipulation of the media by the
US military - a precedent that is likely to be
repeated the second time round. (Jan 28,
'03)
Kuwait's American friend ... and
foe Kuwait,
the most pro-US nation in the Gulf, and the only
one openly committed to providing a physical
base for an Iraqi invasion, has experienced a
rash of anti-American violence over the past
four months. And that's not likely to prove to
have been a coincidence. (Jan 28,
'03)
Apres Saddam, le
deluge
When the shooting stops in Iraq, the result could be thousands killed, hundreds
of thousands injured, millions forced to flee their homes as refugees, mass
hunger or even starvation in the midst of an environmental disaster of a
magnitude worse than the wreck of the Exxon Valdez. So ... what's the plan?
- David Isenberg (Jan 27, '03)
COMMENTARY
Will
the real Musharraf please stand up
In Pakistan's latest policy reversal, it
claims that terror attacks in the country are not the work of al-Qaeda
elements, as it has frequently suggested to the US in the past. This revised
stance, though, cuts no ice with Washington, and President General Pervez
Musharraf will soon have to decide where his true allegiances lie. -
Syed Saleem Shahzad (Jan
27, '03)
US paves way for new Indonesia military ties
Indonesia's military - infamous for an abominable human rights record - will
soon be donning the guise of respectability as the administration of US
President George W Bush is one step closer to renewing military training aid
for it. - Jim Lobe (Jan 27, '03)
On the road with
Murder Inc
Toxic cigars, exploding seashells, poisoned
bathing suits - watching the US return to its formerly discredited policy of
targeted assassinations abroad is like watching (as George W Bush might put it)
a re-run of a bad movie - a movie the rest of the world isn't interested in
watching. - Ian Urbina (Jan 25,
'03)
Iraq's shadow on
Balochistan
Pakistan's Balochistan province has
considerable strategic importance for the United States, partly because most of
Pakistan's oil and gas resources are located there (about 30 percent
controlled by American oil companies) and partly because some of its
tribes have strong ties to Iraq. This week's attacks on gas pipelines in
Balochistan, therefore, take on especial significance. - B Raman
(Jan 25, '03)
Political
war on multiple fronts
No one argues that the United States has awesome military power,
enough to fight two, three or even four different wars at the same time. Where
it is not so formidable, however, is on the political battlefield, as its long
dispute with North Korea has shown. - Francesco Sisci (Jan
23, '03)
Gadding with Gaddafi
In today's world, it's no longer enough to say
that you're against terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction. What Western intelligence agencies want to know is what you have,
what you want, what you buy and what you can sell. It's called capability-based
threat assessment, and it's putting Muammar Gaddafi and his 15-year-old Libyan
weapons program on the regime change radar screen.-
Ehsan Ahrari (Jan
23, '03)
Who will cry for Saddam this
time?
The last time that the US fought a war with Iraq, several
Arab nations, including Jordan, openly sided with Saddam Hussein. So did their
people, many of whom bought Saddam paraphernalia in honor of "the liberator".
How things change: This time around, says one Amman shopkeeper, "Even the few
Iraqis who still come here are fed up with Saddam." (Jan
23, '03)
ANALYSIS
The net closes on Pakistan
The unexpected outburst by Pakistan's
President General Pervez Musharraf that his country could be next on the hit
list after Iraq has raised many eyebrows - as well as fears in Pakistan that
the US is trying to curb the country's nuclear program. Which would make India
very happy indeed. - Syed Saleem Shahzad
(Jan 22, '03)
THE ROVING EYE
Arab impotence in the
face of war
As the US moves inexorably toward war in Iraq, the 21 members
of the Arab League haven't even been able to convene a meeting among themselves
to rally against a war that they all view as an exercise in blatant Middle
Eastern colonialism. - Pepe Escobar
(Jan 22, '03)
Iraqi oil: One big
sticky mess
With 112 billion barrels of proven (and perhaps
another 100 billion in unproven) oil reserves, Iraq sits on a staggering amount
of potential revenue. But for those sitting in Washington thinking through
postwar scenarios for the country, Iraqi oil is not so much a solution as the
source of all kinds of problems. -
David Isenberg (Jan 21, '03)
THE ROVING EYE
Pharaohs and liberators
Forget about Saddam Hussein going into exile
- it just isn't going to happen, according to the word in Cairo. So what is
going to happen is that when the US-led war on Iraq takes place, the myriad
militant jihadi organizations around the world will focus all of their
attention on attacking US interests. - Pepe
Escobar (Jan 20, '03)
Iraq:
Thinking through the aftermath
As the world obsesses over whether the United States will
invade Iraq, the US military is already thinking through the aftermath and, in
the process, coming up with some surprising conclusions and strategies -
including a possible postwar role for some units of Saddam Hussein's Republican
Guard. - David Isenberg (Jan 20, '03)
ANALYSIS
The
ghost of Lebanon past
In June 1982, the Israeli army invaded
Lebanon and found itself greeted with flowers and celebrations by the
persecuted Shi'ite minority in the south. The party, as events proved, was
premature. And now, some in the region with long memories are wondering whether
history is repeating itself in Iraq. - Jim Lobe
(Jan 17, '03)
The odds of
Iraq-inspired terror reprisal In
the event of war in Iraq, world leaders are assessing the possibility of
terrorist reprisals in the region and elsewhere. Fortunately, given Saddam
Hussein's historical estrangement from militant Islam and the stepped-up
security measures in the US, Canada and Europe, the odds of a terror strike in
those areas seem low. A weak link, however, might be found in Asia. - B
Raman (Jan 17, '03)
Iraqi opposition: From
conflict to unity?
The relationship between the Iraqi
opposition and the regime of Saddam Hussein has gone through various
phases, from cooperation to conflict to repression. A key question
now is whether the opposition has achieved the unity, determination and ability
to develop, with US help, a new democratic regime in the country.
(Jan 17, '03)
Saddam Hussein and the
highway blues
Ever wonder what happened to Ugandan
dictator Idi Amin? Today he lives - quite comfortably, say most reports - in a
Jeddah hotel, a permanent guest of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Will such be
Saddam's fate as well? The odds are against 1) a country agreeing to take him;
2) him agreeing to go; and 3) the US letting it happen, all at the same time.
But as the pressure in the Middle East builds, that endless highway may start
looking better and better. - Ian Urbina (Jan 16, '03)
Afghanistan: The war
gathers momentum
As guerrilla activities against foreign
military forces in Afghanistan increase, a concerted pamphlet and radio
campaign is also under way to win over the hearts and minds of ordinary Afghans
to rise up against the "invaders". - Syed Saleem Shahzad
(Jan 16, '03)
Reluctant Turkey edges
toward US camp
In a direct reversal of the situation in
the 1991 Gulf War, Turkey's generals are champing at the bit to join in the
action with the United States against Saddam Hussein, while it is the
government that is dragging its feet on opening up its country to thousands of
US troops. But as is the case so often in Turkey, the military will likely have
its way. - K Gajendra Singh (Jan
15, '03)
THE ROVING
EYE
Smoking guns
and the dogs of war
UN weapons inspectors have visited more
than 200 sites in Iraq without producing evidence of an Iraqi weapon of mass
destruction. Which means absolutely nothing; with 250,000 American troops in
place around Iraq and patience running thin in Washington, expect a gun,
smoking or not, to come to light. But what happens after that is not
so clear-cut. - Pepe Escobar (Jan
15, '03)
Pakistani backlash to FBI
raids
As the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
in collaboration with Pakistani security officials, continues its wave of
arrests of suspected al-Qaeda fighters in Pakistan, opposition is mounting to
what many see as an intrusion by the US into their country, and they are not
planning to take it lying down. - Syed Saleem Shahzad
(Jan 14, '03)
Intelligent reform of
US intelligence
As the US undertakes reform of its
intelligence establishment, it is clear that what worked (or didn't) in the
past will no longer be sufficient, and that for a time-tested model of a
workable division of law enforcement, internal intelligence, foreign
intelligence, military intelligence and analysis, US lawmakers might usefully
look to Europe. - Alexander Casella
(Jan 14, '03)
US-Indonesia
military ties closer
As early as this week, the US Congress may decide to restore a
military training program for Indonesia's military despite uncertainties about
its human-rights record or evidence that suggests its involvement in the
killing of two US citizens. - Tim Shorrock
(Jan 14, '03)
Madrassas:
A make-believe world
For many, the word madrassa has
become synonymous with Islamic fanaticism, rather than religious school. Which
is to misunderstand the essence of the seminaries, although they certainly have
an influence on many young and impressionable minds. - Aijazz Ahmed
(Jan 13, '03)
History awaits China's Korea
move
Half a century ago, the future of Sino-US
relations was cast in Korea. Now, once again, Sino-US relations are at a
crossroads - in Korea. The decisions Beijing makes today about what to do about
North Korea could well set the scene for another half-century. - Francesco Sisci
(Jan 13, '03)
The unreality of imminent war
Even as US media are
filled with images of troops embracing their families before embarking for the
Gulf, the sense of inevitable war is mixed with a strange air of unreality, as
the crisis in Pyongyang pushes Iraq to the sideline of the foreign policy
debate in the US. - Jim Lobe
(Jan 13, '03)
Japan could 'go nuclear' in months
As if the specter of a nuclear North Korea weren't enough, the Japanese are
talking openly about mounting their own nuclear defenses against their
belligerent neighbor. They have the missiles; they have the fissile materials
and the technical sophistication. All they need is the will, and Pyongyang may
just provide the incentive. - Marc Erikson (Jan
13, '03)
Libya tries to come in
from the cold
Trivia question: Which national leader was first in the world to
issue an Interpol arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden - way back in 1998?
Answer: Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, one of the world's longest-serving pariah
leaders, who in recent years has been telegraphing his desire to be re-accepted
into polite Western society. What he offers in return is truly valuable
intelligence - but he has yet to win over a skeptical West. - Ian Urbina
(Jan 10, '03)
SPENGLER
The 'Ring' and the
remnants of the West
No better guide exists to the mood and morals of
the United States than the ongoing release of the film version of J R R
Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings. Boorish as the new American Empire
might seem, it is an anti-empire populated by reluctant heroes, much like
Tolkien's Hobbits. Under pressure, though, it will respond with a fierceness
and cohesion that will surprise its adversaries.
(Jan 10, '03)
North Korea: Beijing
won't play peacemaker
In a rare display of its feelings
on the North Korea nuclear crisis, Beijing has dispelled hopes that it can play
a major peacemaking role in the standoff between Washington and Pyongyang.
(Jan 10, '03)
Pakistan: Fissures
in an unnatural alliance
The fundamental conflict of interests
and underlying ideologies between the United States and Pakistan is manifested
in the recent skirmishes between forces of the two countries on the Afghanistan
border, and an escalation of tensions is inevitable.
(Jan 10, '03)
A bloody destiny for
Pakistan's border
Given the historically warlike nature of the Waziri clans living on the border
between Pakistan and Afghanistan; given that west Pakistan is the power
base of a strengthening anti-US political coalition; and given the passions
unleashed by a New Year's Day gun battle involving US troops that left several
dead, and a madrassa bombed - given all this, residents of the
region believe the prospect of further bloodshed is practically assured.
- Syed Saleem Shahzad (Jan 9,
'03)
COMMENTARY
US
ties weigh heavily in Pakistan
While constantly being urged by the
United States to do more in the war on terror, Pakistan, in the wake of the
recent clash with US troops on the border with Afghanistan, is beginning to
wonder just what it stands to gain by sticking with Washington. And the feeling
in Washington seems to be mutual. (Jan 9, '03)
Militants join
forces for global struggle
As the US expands its military presence in Afghanistan and
Central Asia, militant opposition grows and becomes more organized. Now it is
reported that leaders of Islamic groups from across Asia may be planning a
meeting soon in Khartoum, Sudan, to coordinate anti-Western campaigns
throughout the world. - Syed Saleem Shahzad
(Jan
8, '03)
Through the valley of the shadow of death
When you bandy a phrase like "war on terror" about, it tends
to lose its meaning. Not, however, in the tiny Kashmiri village of Darhal,
where townsfolk live in continual fear and where the grief has yet to diminish
after the brutal recent killings of three teenage girls, innocent victims of a
meaningless phrase. - Praveen Swami (Jan 8,
'03)
Pennywise commitment to Arab
democracy
The US State Department's new US-Middle East Partnership
Initiative is chock full of laudable goals for the support of Arab democracy,
but with a total allocation of just US$29 million, the program seems unlikely
to amount to more than a public relations exercise. - David Isenberg
(Jan 8, '03)
Pyongyang
vs the world
Who is the more foolhardy in the standoff
between Pyongyang and Washington? The answer is not as obvious as some have
suggested.
Phar Kim Beng argues that in its own belligerent way born of
half a century of isolation, North Korea has used the current nuclear crisis to
shore up its own legitimacy at home and abroad.
The
genius of North Korean strategy
Gary LaMoshi examines the chronic US failure to understand the
importance of face when dealing with Asians.
The
straight shooter and loss of face
(Jan 7, '03)
The test for Chinese
diplomacy
China's emerging status as a great power is at a crossroads. China is
positioned to play a critical role in defusing the Korea crisis, but to do so,
Beijing may need to abandon its traditional passive posture in favor of a more
active diplomatic role. - Phillip C Saunders and Jing-dong Yuan
(Jan 7, '03)
Kim Jong-il out-Saddams Saddam
Saddam Hussein must be green with envy at the way Kim
Jong-il is holding up his end of the axis of evil. But the Bush
administration will be seeing red as Kim mocks US military might. - Jim
Lobe (Jan 6, '03)
|
DynCorp: Afghan
Security 'R' Us
During the 1991 Persian Gulf war, one in every 50 persons on the
battlefield worked for a private contractor; by the time of Bosnia, that ratio
had climbed to one in 10. And now, US-based private contractor
DynCorp has received its highest-visibility task yet: ensuring the security of
Afghan President Hamid Karzai. But not everyone believes it wise, or right, to
allow a private firm to do the work of government. -
David Isenberg (Jan 3, '03)
Baghdad: Linchpin of a
new economic order
Multiple choice: The economic effects of regime
change in Iraq might include (a) The neutering of OPEC, (b) The destruction of
the Russian oil producing sector, (c) The implosion of the Russian budget, (d)
A bonanza of de-nationalized Iraqi oil concessions for US-based multinationals,
(e) A cascade of de-nationalized oil concessions around the globe or (f) A
fundamental re-ordering of the global economy, including all of the above.
(Jan 3, '03)
Riyadh:
Linchpin of a new religious order
The US troops now
pouring into the Persian Gulf region are not there solely to achieve Iraqi
regime change. Arguably their more important task is to serve as the visible
muscle in the long-term battle between the West and a more elusive foe than
even Saddam: the Wahhabi branch of Islam, enemy of modernism and natural rival
to Western democracy. And Wahhabism is based not in Iraq, but Saudi Arabia. -
Syed Saleem Shahzad (Jan
3, '03)
CHECHEN CONFLICT
No end to the bleeding
In failing to distinguish between those genuinely seeking independence
for Chechnya and those with pan-Islamic objectives for the territory, Russia is
making the problem intractable, B Raman writes. Hooman Peimani
argues that Moscow's resort to the extensive use of force will only leave its
objectives unachievable, all of which is taking an horrific toll on Chechnya's
economy and environment, reports Sergei Blagov.
(Jan 3, '03)
Moscow's
muddled objectives
Iron
fist leaves no room to move
Environmental
disaster in the making
ANALYSIS
Why Iraq
matters more than North Korea
Iraq likely doesn't have nukes, and the United States wants to make
war on Iraq. North Korea probably does have them, and the United States wants
to resolve that row with diplomacy. It's odd, isn't it? But there is more to
Washington's strategy than meets the eye. - Marc Erikson
(Jan 2, '03)
North Korea: Such a nuisance
It has no oil, or strategic resources of any kind. It has no economic clout. It
has no global or even regional influence, and no friends. All it has is an
obsolete Cold War-era nuclear saber to rattle, and a pitiful population of 20
million to hide behind. Yet Pyongyang's leadership, for all its threats and
posturing, is only showing its weakness to the world. - Francesco Sisci
(Jan 2, '03)
COMMENTARY
Pakistan
bent on proliferation path
The nuclear nexus between Pakistan and
North Korea is well documented, and now Islamabad has agreed to bury the
hatchet with Iran and exchange military delegations, with the obvious
implications of deeper and more serious ties. Which raises the question ...
just what exactly does Pakistan think it is doing? - Stephen Blank
(Jan 2, '03)
South
Asia's escalating nuclear rivalry
Dark omens in south
Waziristan
The recent skirmishes involving US and
Pakistani security forces on the Afghan border with Pakistan serve as a
reminder that the volatile region, far from becoming more settled with the
American presence, remains a haven and a launching pad for al-Qaeda and Taliban
remnants. - B Raman (Jan 2, '03)
US on Hong Kong:
Calling the kettle black
A leading US newspaper has deplored "Hong Kong's current drive to
enact insidious security legislation that threatens its people's freedoms", and
George W Bush has reportedly phoned Jiang Zemin to express concern over Hong
Kong's proposed national security law. That would be the same George Bush who
signed into law the draconian USA Patriot Act. -
Henry C K Liu (Jan 2, '03)
|
|
For earlier articles,
please go to:
|