Arms spending rises in developing world
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS - The spreading economic crisis is taking a bite out of Western military spending - even as the world's developing nations, along with Russia and China, boosted their arms expenditures last year. In a study released on Monday, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported a decline in military spending last year in the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan and Western and Central Europe.
The fall, described as the first since 1998, was attributed to major
spending cuts primarily by austerity-driven and deficit-plagued Western nations.
"We are seeing what may be the beginning of a shift in the balance of world military spending, from the rich Western countries to emerging regions," said Samuel Perlo-Freeman, director of SIPRI's Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme.
Since the 2008 global financial crisis, 18 of the 31 countries in the European Union, mostly countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), have cut military spending by more than 10% in real terms. Despite these cuts, members of NATO collectively spent a trillion dollars.
Still, the United States and its allies are responsible for the great majority of world military spending. The United States, the world's largest military spender, announced last week that its 2013 proposed defense budget will amount to about US$526.6 billion: a reduction of $3.9 billion compared with its 2012 budget.
The 2013 budget will include "substantial reductions" for the US army, which was heavily involved in military operations in Afghanistan, and to a lesser extent in Iraq. The drawdown in Afghanistan is primarily responsible for reduced spending by the United States.
The reductions were, however, "substantially offset" by increased spending in Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, and Latin America, according to SIPRI.
China, the second-largest spender in 2012, increased its expenditure by 7.8% (US$11.5 billion). Russia, the third-largest spender, increased its expenditure by 16% (US$12.3 billion).
According to the study, overall world military expenditure totaled US$1.75 trillion in 2012, a fall of 0.5% in real terms since 2011.
Asked whether military spending was primarily on arms purchases overseas or acquisitions from domestic weapons industries, Perlo-Freeman told IPS the figures include spending both on arms imports and on domestic procurement.
He said there are very few countries worldwide that rely on their domestic arms industries for "most" of their military equipment. These are probably limited to the United States, Russia, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Japan, and possibly China and Israel. However, there are many more countries that produce some of their own equipment, but still rely on imports for certain major systems.
In Asia, he said, China has an increasingly advanced arms industry able to produce across all types of equipment, and have been gradually weaning themselves off Russian imports that they were previously highly dependent on. However, they still import quite a lot, he said.
South Korea also has a strongly developing industry, although it still has to import equipment from the US, such as advanced combat aircraft. India has a large arms industry, but not a very effective one, probably due to an extremely inefficient bureaucracy in charge of the industry, he said.
"Despite decades of effort, they have not succeeded in being able to develop and produce their own advanced weapons systems," Perlo-Freeman said. "They have a [high] local content of arms procurement É but a lot of that consists of for example assembly from kit under license of other countries' systems," he said.
Elsewhere in Asia, Singapore has a significant industry with strength in certain niches, but still imports most of its equipment.
There are many other countries with some low level arms production, like Indonesia.
"And North Korea, of course, has a major industry, though that's a rather special case," Perlo-Freeman said.
In the Middle East, Israel has an extremely advanced arms industry, in some areas (for example, it is a world leader in unmanned aerial vehicles). But it still imports - mostly under US military aid - in particular major combat aircraft, which Israel doesn't produce itself.
"They almost certainly could, but why bother when they get them for free from the US?" he said.
He also said that Turkey has a well-developed industry in some areas, but still imports the majority of its equipment. Iran has a local arms industry but it is not very advanced in most respects. It has imported a lot from Russia in the past, though now of course this is affected by sanctions. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Jordan produce some armored vehicles, but still import the great majority of their arms.
In Africa, the only country with a significant industry is South Africa, although it also imports a lot, he said. In Latin America, the only country with a significant industry is Brazil, though again it still imports the great majority of its major equipment.
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
