Southeast Asia

One year in: Mega disappointment
By Richel Langit

JAKARTA - Her victory in the 1999 general election was considered the ultimate symbol of people power, and her ascension to the presidential post a year ago this week was deemed necessary to save the country from disintegration, and spare Indonesia's 215 million people from the prolonged economic crisis.

But after one year in office, President Megawati Sukarnoputri, ushered into the country's top post after members of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) removed then president Abdurrahman Wahid for incompetence on July 23, 2001, appears more concerned with position than with the millions of Indonesians now living in dire economic poverty.

And to a great extent, Megawati, once considered Indonesia's most reform-minded leader, has become a liability to the country's reform process itself.

No wonder recent polls carried out by national media showed that most people were not satisfied with Megawati's performance. A poll conducted by the leading national daily Kompas, for example, showed that almost 72 percent of 1,773 respondents said they were disappointed with the Megawati administration, while a poll by the Detik.com Internet news portal revealed that 70 percent of its 1,000 respondents considered Megawati a failure.

Indeed, much-needed reforms, which many people had thought would proceed smoothly considering the fact that Megawati's Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI Perjuangan) controls most of the seats in the House of Representatives (DPR), have come to a virtual halt on all fronts mainly because of strong resistance from the ruling party.

Debates on amendments to the 1945 constitution have hit a snag, with PDI Perjuangan, the biggest faction in the MPR, the country's highest legislative body that is authorized to amend the constitution or write a new one, spearheading a call for a return to the 1945 document. If accepted, PDI Perjuangan's suggestion means changes made in the first, second, and third phases of the constitutional amendment process would have to be annulled, including the introduction of direct presidential elections and the scrapping of the MPR as an institution that has been seen as a super state body that often distorts the people's aspirations.

In the third phase of constitutional amendment, MPR members agreed to adopt a direct presidential system in favor of the current district system. They also endorsed a proposal to change the composition of the MPR so that it would make up of only DPR members and Regional Representative Councils (DPD), with all members elected. These changes, however, were to be finalized in the fourth amendment currently being deliberated by MPR members. And with the current phase of amendment hitting a snag, direct presidential elections might not take place in 2004.

A further delay in the amendment would seriously affect preparations for the 2004 general election, as both amendments require changes in the current laws on general elections and political parties. The government has submitted bills on general election and political party to the House, but the deliberation has been painfully slow. Speculations are rife that Megawati's PDI Perjuangan deliberately slows down the process with the hope that by the time the two laws are passed, the Election Commission will have no time to prepare, forcing it to organize a district election system, which is in line with the party's demand.

Not too long ago, Megawati surprised the public at large by suggesting that Indonesians were not ready yet for a direct presidential election. Her statement runs contrary to people's long demands for a direct presidential election.

Worse still, Megawati's PDI Perjuangan is now making backroom deal with Golkar, the political bandwagon of former dictator Suharto's New Order regime. PDI Perjuangan and Golkar are said to have reached an agreement on presidential election, but tradeoffs behind the deals have not been revealed for public scrutiny.

In the legal sector, Megawati's performance has been appalling. The prosecution of some high-profile corrupters and high-ranking military officers accused of human-rights violations materialized not because of her commitment to the rule of law, but more due to strong public and international pressure.

The prosecution of House Speaker Abkar Tandjung, for example, was triggered not by her desire to wipe out the country's endemic corruption but due to strong public pressure. Akbar, who is also chairman of Golkar, the second-biggest faction in the House, is standing trial at the Central Jakarta District Court on a charge of misappropriating Rp40 billion (US$4.7 million) in funds of the National Bureau of Logistics in 1999. Many people believe that the funds were used to finance Golkar's campaign activities, a charge that could lead to the party's dissolution if proved.

The prosecution of a number of senior officials and military personnel, including three army generals, accused of human-rights violations in East Timor in 1999 is also being carried out because of strong pressure from the international community.

In any case, the prosecution of both Tandjung and high-ranking military officers is widely seen as a ploy to save them. Tandjung's trial is generally believed to be an attempt to prevent the House from setting up an investigation team to look into the scandal, while the trial of army generals aims at preventing the United Nations from bringing them to the International Rights Tribunal.

Megawati has also chosen to develop a closer relationship with the powerful military. The result is that the military has more and more influenced Megawati's policies, especially in dealing with ethnic and religious conflicts throughout the country and secessionist movements in Aceh, Ambon, and West Papua.

Moreover, Megawati has more and more turned a deaf ear to people's aspirations. PDI Perjuangan, for example, has blocked moves by legislators to set up a special House investigation team to probe Tandjung's corruption allegation, despite strong public pressure demanding for the establishment of an investigation team. Reliable party sources said that Megawati personally instructed PDI Perjuangan legislators to shoot down the move.

Megawati has also given her unconditional support for the re-election of Jakarta Governor Sutiyoso, a former chief of the Jakarta Military Command who had been declared a suspect in the bloody attack on the headquarters of the Indonesian Democratic Party in 1996. The attack killed a number of Megawati's die-hard supporters. Taking her supporters and attack victims by surprise, Megawati issued a "recommendation" letter instructing PDI Perjuangan legislators, the biggest faction in the local legislative body, to support Sutiyoso, with a threat of expulsion if they chose to disobey her instruction.

Despite vehement opposition by local councilors, the provincial administration, students, and non-governmental organizations, Megawati is intent on declaring a state of emergency in Aceh, where the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) has been waging a war for independence since 1970s.

It is not surprising, therefore, that some of Megawati's closest aides have left her, the latest one being legislator Indira Damayanti Sugondo, who decided to quit PDI Perjuangan after the party refused to push for the establishment of an independent team to investigate Tandjung. Earlier, legislator Sophan Sophian, considered a very close aide of Megawati, also resigned as a PDI Perjuangan representative in the House for the same reason.

Signs of rebellion against Megawati have also become apparent within her party. When the House convened for a plenary meeting to decide whether or not it would establish an investigation team to question Tandjung, Megawati instructed PDI Perjuangan legislators to vote against the move. But, when the voting did take place, as many as 94 chose to abstain, five voted in favor of establishing a probe team, and only three voted against. It meant many PDI Perjuangan legislators chose to defy Megawati's instruction.

Indeed, Megawati has changed for the worse. Her pro-poor image has vanished without a trace. Gone is her image as someone who understands the feelings, sufferings, and the plight of poor, marginalized people, as someone who fights for the interest of her people and their well-being.

Some of her closest aides in PDI Perjuangan have branded Megawati as an authoritarian leader who pretends to be a democrat by soliciting input from fellow party members but decides everything on her own.

"She is an authoritarian leader. She listens to the opinions of others but eventually decides things on her own, and nobody dares to defy her," PDI Perjuangan legislator Mochtar Buchori said recently when asked to comment on Megawati's leadership style.

"As a friend, I don't even recognize Megawati anymore," said Eros Djarot, formerly a noted PDI Perjuangan activist who decided to set up his own party - the Bung Karno Nationalist Party - as a protest to Megawati's insensitivity to the people's aspirations.

(©2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


 
Jul 25, 2002



 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.