Response to Norman A. Bailey: The world is not behind the U.S.

Response to Norman A. Bailey: The world is not behind the U.S.

M.K. Bhadrakumar February 19, 2015 3:43 AM (UTC+8)
Asia Times is not responsible for the opinions, facts or any media content presented by contributors. In case of abuse, click here to report.

Russia’s encirclement was the US objective in masterminding the coup in Kiev last February. Should Russia have obliged the US? That is the question.

How Ukraine reached this point cannot be overlooked — that is, the genesis of this crisis ought to be kept in mind while evaluating Russia’s actions in the downstream of the regime change in Kiev.
Frankly, the ‘world’ has not been endorsing the US’ Ukraine line. Even European allies are reluctantly going along.

To turn it all around a bit, how could the world have dealt with the US after what it did to Iraq or Libya? But, we all continue to deal with the US, don’t we? Therefore, the big issue here is something else: What happens to international law and the UN Charter when great powers behave like this?

M.K. Bhadrakumar
MK Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service for over 29 years, with postings including India’s ambassador to Uzbekistan (1995-1998) and to Turkey (1998-2001). He writes the “Indian Punchline” blog and has written regularly for the Asia Times since 2001.